/
19470307_reps_18_190.xml
3239 lines (3239 loc) · 266 KB
/
19470307_reps_18_190.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1947-03-07</date>
<parliament.no>18</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>2</period.no>
<chamber>REPS</chamber>
<page.no>478</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">House of Representatives. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1947-03-07</day.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker (Hon. J. S.Rosevear)</inline>took the chair at 10.30 a.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>SPECIAL ADJOURNMENT</title>
<page.no>478</page.no>
<type>special adjournment</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. CHIFLEY</inline>(Macquarie - Prime </para>
<para>Minister and Treasurer) [10.31].- I move - </para>
<para>That the House, at its rising, adjourn to Wednesday next, at 3 p.m. </para>
<para class="block">It is proposed that the House shall meet on next Thursday morning. The Attorney-General will introduce the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Bill next Wednesday, and it is hoped to go on with the debate of that bill on the Wednesday following. Subject to the Stevedoring Bill being disposed of, time may be allotted next Wednesday, or on the following Tuesday, to a discussion of the statements made by the Minister for External Affairs <inline font-weight="bold">(Dr. Evatt)</inline> on the international situation and by the Minister for Post-war Reconstruction <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Dedman)</inline> on the International Conference on Trade and Employment. </para>
<para class="block">Question resolved in the affirmative. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>478</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND CUSTOMS</title>
<page.no>478</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Alleged Irregularities</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>478</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KNX</name.id>
<electorate>WENTWORTH, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HARRISON, Eric</name>
<name role="display">Mr HARRISON</name>
</talker>
<para>- In view of the fact that a former assistant to the Director- General of Australian War Supplies Procurement in Washington has been fined £60 on charges of evasion of customs duties and in view also of the circumstances surrounding other cases at present under consideration by the Court, which gravely reflect upon officers of the Customs Department, will the Prime Minister immediately appoint a royal commission or committee of inquiry to ascertain the extent of attempts, within the administration of the Customs Department, to defraud the Commonwealth? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>478</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate>MACQUARIE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Prime Minister</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I was not aware of the circumstances connected with the case in which a fine of £60 has been imposed. </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">I know of no reason why a royal commission should be appointed, but I will make investigations, and a full reply will be furnished later. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>TAXATION</title>
<page.no>478</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Annual Report of Commissioner</title>
<page.no>478</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. CHIFLEY</inline>(Macquarie- Prime. </para>
<para>Minister and Treasurer) [10.33]. - I lay on the table the following paper : - </para>
<para>Taxation - Twenty-sixth Report of Commissioner, dated 1st May, 1946, together with Statistical Appendices. </para>
<para class="block">This report is dated the 1st May, 1946, and is made by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. L..</inline> S. Jackson, who was the Commissioner of Taxation at that date. The ex-Commissioner desires me to say, in tabling it, that the delay in presenting it to the Parliament is due both to printing difficulties and to litigation that was pending concerning the correctness of the practice adopted . by him and his predecessor in giving in the schedule headed " questionable returns ", individual names of persons who were regarded as having committed breaches or evasions of the Income Tax Assessment Act. The recent judgment of the Supreme Court in New South Wales has confirmed the validity of the practice mentioned. </para>
<para>Ordered to be printed. </para>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>478</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ARMED FORCES</title>
<page.no>478</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Australians in Japan: Transport for wives and families. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>478</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JVJ</name.id>
<electorate>LANG, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MULCAHY, Daniel</name>
<name role="display">Mr MULCAHY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Minister for the Army seen a report in a section of the press early this week that wives and families of officers and warrantofficers will be permitted to travel firstclass by rail to join the ship which will take them to Japan from Sydney, but the wives and families of other ranks will have to travel second-class? If so, what does he intend to do about it? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>478</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWR</name.id>
<electorate>ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for the Army</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAMBERS, Cyril</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHAMBERS</name>
</talker>
<para>- My attention was drawn to that statement which appeared in the press. I immediately took up the matter with the Army authorities and issued an instruction that the wives and families of officers and all other ranks must be enabled to travel first class, and that all should be given the same conveniences and comfort while travelling by train to port. Whilst an officer may have travelling with him only his wife, a private soldier may be accompanied by his wife and two or three children, and the latter, I believe, should be entitled to as much comfort as the former. Consequently, I have issued instructions that the wives and children of both officers and other ranks shall travel first fi iiss. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWT</name.id>
<electorate>MORETON, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRANCIS, Josiah</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRANCIS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Last Wednesday, in the absence of the Minister for the Army, I directed to the Prime Minister a question, about the British Commonwealth Occupation Forces in Japan. I sought, from the right honorable gentleman complete details as to how the wives of servicemen in that area could make application, for permission to reside there. I stated my question at some length, and the right honorable gentleman undertook to obtain, the information from the Minister for the Army. What I am particularly anxious, to know is whether the information will be forthcoming to-day? If not, I should like an assurance that the details will be available when the House moots next Wednesday. "I have received ii number of inquiries about this matter, but I have not been able to obtain from the Department of the Army any clear and definite information. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWR</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAMBERS, Cyril</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHAMBERS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I can supply the information, immediately. The position i.« that the wife of a member of the British Commonwealth Occupation Forces in Japan has no say as to whether she may proceed there. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWT</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRANCIS, Josiah</name>
<name role="display">Mr Francis</name>
</talker>
<para>- Who has ? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWR</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAMBERS, Cyril</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHAMBERS</name>
</talker>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">- Her</inline>husband. There was a time when I thought that the wives did have a voice in matters of this kind, but in this instance they have not. The serviceman himself must make a request to the Commander-in-Chief, LieutenantGeneral Robertson, for permission for his wife to proceed to Japan. His name is then placed on the priority list. When his turn comes, he is informed that accommodation will be made available for his wife in. Japan. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWT</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRANCIS, Josiah</name>
<name role="display">Mr Francis</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the wife, while in Australia, required to obtain any information from the Department of the Army? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWR</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAMBERS, Cyril</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHAMBERS</name>
</talker>
<para>- She will receive all the necessary information from the department when to proceed to Japan. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWT</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRANCIS, Josiah</name>
<name role="display">Mr Francis</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will she be notified what articles she may take, and what she may not take? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWR</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAMBERS, Cyril</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHAMBERS</name>
</talker>
<para>- She will be informed of precisely what she can take. Presumably, the honorable member wants to know whether she can take her sewing machine or perambulator. I shall obtain for him full information relating to the matter. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BRETTON WOODS AGREEMENT</title>
<page.no>479</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4T</name.id>
<electorate>DARLING DOWNS, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FADDEN, Arthur William</name>
<name role="display">Mr FADDEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Should Australia now decide to become a member of the International Monetary Fund, will the Prime Minister give the terms on which this nation, will .be admitted? Is it a fact that the terms may be less advantageous now than had Australia become a foundation member within the specified time? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The understanding under which the Government will agree to the ratification of the Bretton Woods Agreement will ,be that Australia be admitted to membership on the same terms applying to the foundation members. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4T</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FADDEN, Arthur William</name>
<name role="display">Mr Fadden</name>
</talker>
<para>- If such terms are not extended to Australia, what will happen then? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- In that case we should have to give further consideration to the matter. A condition of ratification is that we be admitted to membership on the terms applying to <inline font-style="italic">&n</inline> original member. As the right honorable gentleman is aware, certain important issues are associated with admittance to membership as an original member. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE' ON TRADE AND EMPLOYMENT</title>
<page.no>479</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Empire Trade Preference</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KZJ</name.id>
<electorate>REID, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LANG, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr LANG</name>
</talker>
<para>- In view of the statement by the Minister for Post-war Reconstruction that it would be possible torn oke concessions at Geneva without involving tariff preference, will he give an. assurance to the House that no concession will be made that will affect our protective tariff? Will a certificate be given by the Tariff Board -to this effect, and' will he lay such certificate on the table?' </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Will he give an assurance that no action will be taken to- abandon the preferences obtained at Ottawa without the consent of the Parliament? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>480</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate>CORIO, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Defence</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I can give, at once the assurance that no modification, of our existing tariff protection will be made without the consent of the Parliament. I shall consider the other questions, asked by like honorable member. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>480</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SUGAR</title>
<page.no>480</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>480</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>J7U</name.id>
<electorate>DARWIN, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LYONS, Enid</name>
<name role="display">Dame ENID LYONS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is. the Minister representing the Minister for Trade and.- Customs' aware that, in spite of the fact that housewives are unable to obtain sufficient sugar for jam making, there is in many places a shortage of manufactured jam? Will he have prepared a report to ,be laid on the table showing the details of the distribution of all sugar processed in Australia for export, for the retail trade and' for industrial purposes, with designations of the industries supplied ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>480</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KYC</name.id>
<electorate>BALLAARAT, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Commerce and Agriculture</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">POLLARD, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Mr POLLARD</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall endeavour to obtain, as soon as possible the information sought by the honorable member. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>FACTS AND FIGURES</title>
<page.no>480</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<para class="block">
<inline font-weight="bold">M'r. WILLIAMS'.-</inline>Has the attention of the Minister for Information been drawn to the reports in this morning's press of statements made by a member of the- Liberal- Association of New South Wales who alleged that certain figures published' in <inline font-style="italic">Facts and Figures,</inline> which is issued by the Department of Information, are false and misleading? Will the Minister state whether there is any foundation for that allegation, and will ho give the facts to the House? </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>480</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>BV8</name.id>
<electorate>MELBOURNE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Immigration</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CALWELL, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr CALWELL</name>
</talker>
<para>- The facts stated in <inline font-style="italic">Facts- and. Figures</inline> are always unassailable. I have read the statement to which the honorable member has referred. <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bates</inline> is either- unable to read, or to understand th© meaning of words-. In- the issue of <inline font-style="italic">Facts and Figures</inline> to which reference was made- in the> New South Wales- Legislative Assembly the position of Australia's- export- trade- was stated- accurately. I shall read the paragraph to which <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bates</inline> referred and F ask honorable members' to note whether what, was printed in that- publication- does ot does noi; warrant the stupid or malicious interpretation placed upon it by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bates.</inline> The> paragraph is as follows.: - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>In generally the quantity of exports has not yet returned to the 1038-39 level, largely because of the reduced supplies of wheat and other foodstuffs which are available. Export prices, in 1945-46 were about 75 per cent, higher than in 1938-39, as compared with an increased value, of exports of 54 per cent. The rapid rate of increase of exports during 1945-40 indicates, however, that the quantity of exports must now be approaching the 1938-39 level. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bates</inline>suggested that the increased value of Australian exports was due to inflated values for wheat. The language of the paragraph is surely clear and simple enough to be understood, even by one with <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bates's</inline> obviously limited understanding. </para>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>480</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DAIRYING</title>
<page.no>480</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>480</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JLR</name.id>
<electorate>MARANOA, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ADERMANN, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr ADERMANN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Can the Minister for Commerce and Agriculture explain the differential treatment meted out to milk producers 'in Queensland? For example, north Queensland milk producers have been entirely omitted from the benefit of the recent subsidy, and producers supplying the Ipswich, Toowoomba and Rockhampton districts receive a lesser subsidy than those supplying the metropolitan area. Has the honorable gentleman received protests from the Queensland dairymen's organization concerning this matter, and if <inline font-style="italic">&0j</inline> what answer- does he propose to give to the organization ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>480</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KYC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">POLLARD, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Mr POLLARD</name>
</talker>
<para>- Milk subsidies and milk prices are determined by the Prices Commissioner, who works under the control of the Minister for Trade and Customs. In these circumstances I shall ask that Minister to supply the answers to the questions asked by the honorable member. In reply to the second part of the question, whether L have received protests from the dairymen's organization in Queensland regarding this matter., I ha.ve received some protests; they have been submitted to my colleague for suitable action. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>480</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ROYAL MILITARY COLLEGE</title>
<page.no>480</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Transport oe Cadets. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>480</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JF7</name.id>
<electorate>FREMANTLE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BEAZLEY, Kim</name>
<name role="display">Mr BEAZLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Due to rail delays, the Western Australian cadets at the </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Royal Military College, Duntroon, when going home for their six or seven weeks' Christmas holidays, missed the military Trans-Australian train, and took two weeks to get home. It also took them more than a week to return. So by comparison with cadets from other States they lost three weeks out of their six or seven weeks' Christmas leave. Will the Minister for the Army give consideration to the issue of air transport vouchers to cadets from distant States in order that so large a proportion of their vacation will not be spent in travelling? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>481</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWR</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAMBERS, Cyril</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHAMBERS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Consideration has been given to this matter since the honorable member brought it to my notice some time ago. Undoubtedly the Western Australian cadets were at a great disadvantage in regard to transport, and I am pleased to be able to inform the honorable member that he will receive a letter some time to-day informing him that in future air transport will be provided for Duntroon cadets. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>481</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NATIONAL MEDICAL SCHEME</title>
<page.no>481</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>481</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L0G</name.id>
<electorate>FLINDERS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RYAN, Rupert</name>
<name role="display">Mr RYAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Can the Prime Minister say whether the Minister for Health was correctly reported as having said that many times the number of doctors practising in Australia to-day would be required to establish a national medical scheme? If so, what is the present number of qualified medical practitioners in this country, and what is the number estimated to be required for a national medical scheme? Does the Government propose the early introduction of a national medical scheme and if so, how is it proposed to give adequate training in the universities to the number of doctors required ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>481</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am not able to say whether the Minister for Health has been correctly reported, but I do know that some time ago when a survey was made to determine the number of doctors, particularly salaried doctors, that would be required to establish a national medical scheme, it was found the number required would not be very much greater than the number already qualified. Since then, the secretary of the British Medical Association, <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Hunter,</inline> has expressed the opinion that too many doctors were being trained. As the honorable member for Flinders is aware, quite a number of doctors are being trained with the aid of a Commonwealth subsidy. These men are under a bond to render three years' service to the Commonwealth after graduation. My own discussions with doctors, particularly in country towns, indicates that if medical practitioners generally are to have reasonable hours of duty, some free weekends, and holidays, a considerable number of additional doctors will be required in nearly all the large centres. I cannot speak of the smaller communities. Therefore, a national medical scheme providing these improved conditions for doctors, and an adequate day and night service to the public, would seem to presage a considerable addition to their ranks, but I am unable to say whether the increase would be as great as that indicated in the reported statement of the Minister for Health. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>481</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>WHEAT</title>
<page.no>481</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Sale to New Zealand</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>481</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MB</name.id>
<electorate>INDI, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCEWEN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr McEWEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Prime Minister yet reached a decision on the question that I addressed to him in this chamber yesterday, namely, whether he would lay on the table of the House all communications and relevant documents leading to the conclusion of the agreement for the sale of Australian wheat to New Zealand? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>481</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I hope that the honorable member will pardon me for not having had an opportunity to deal with this debatable subject during the brief and busy period between yesterday afternoon and this morning. I shall endeavour to discuss the matter early next week with the Minister for Commerce and Agriculture, and so be in a position to reply to the honorable member's question when the House meets again. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>481</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>OLD-AGE PENSIONS</title>
<page.no>481</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>481</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KZR</name.id>
<electorate>BALACLAVA, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WHITE, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Mr WHITE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Immigrants must have been residents of Australia for twenty years before becoming eligible for the old-age pension. That presses 'hard on British people who migrated to Australia just after World War I. I ask the Prime Minister to confer with the Minister for Social Services with a view to lessening the period of residential qualification. Many migrants from Great Britain are still working at 70 and 80 years of age because of their ineligibility to receive the pension. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- A few such cases have been brought to my notice. One or two of them are my own constituents, and, naturally, I am interested. I asked the Minister for Social Services to examine the matter in conjunction with other amendments of the Invalid and Old-age Pensions Act that will have to be made when the bill to consolidate the social services legislation is brought down before the middle of the year. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>482</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ANZAC DAY</title>
<page.no>482</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Parliamentary Sitting</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCA</name.id>
<electorate>CAPRICORNIA, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DAVIDSON, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr DAVIDSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- In view of the recent statement by the Prime Minister to the effect that he would give further thought to this House meeting in the week in which Anzac Day falls, is he prepared to agree that it shall not sit that week in order that 'honorable members may attend Anzac Day functions in their own electorates? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I mentioned before that the Leader of the Opposition and the Leader of the Australian Country party had discussed that matter with me. Such a large volume of legislation will be before honorable members at that time that the Government could hardly consent to the House not sitting that week. After next week, apart from the period from the 28th March to the 16th April when we will be in recess, the House will sit on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays until our legislative programme has been disposed of. I promise to discuss the matter further with the leaders of the opposition parties, but my mind tends rather to sitting on the Tuesday and Wednesday and finishing early on the Thursday afternoon of the week in which Anzac Day falls than to no sitting at all that week. Perhaps arrangements could be madeby the parties opposite with respect to honorable members wishing to attend Anzac Day functions in their own constituencies. Members in the two adjacent States would , be able to attend such functions. I shall ascertain the views of the </para>
</talk.start>
<para>Leader of the Opposition and the Leader of the Australian Country party as soon as possible, 'but I repeat that I would not he prepared to agree to the House not sitting that week because of the large volume of legislation that will then be on the notice-paper. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>482</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MATCHES</title>
<page.no>482</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Shortage in Tasmania. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEP</name.id>
<electorate>FRANKLIN, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FALKINDER, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr FALKINDER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minis ter representing the Minister for Supply and Shipping what steps are being taken to alleviate the acute shortage of matches in Tasmania? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I was not aware of a shortage of matches in Tasmania, but I assume that what the honorable gentleman says is true. The shortage may be due to either a shortage of production or shipping difficulties. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FALKINDER, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr Falkinder</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is much more acute now than formerly. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall ask the Minister for Supply and Shipping to make inquiries as to what action may be taken to help the honorable member. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>PRICES CONTROL</title>
<page.no>482</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Declaration of Moore's Silk Store. Brisbane</title>
<page.no>482</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KDB</name.id>
<electorate>HERBERT, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">EDMONDS, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr EDMONDS</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Prices Commissioner recently declared Moore's Silk Store, Queen-street, Brisbane. The management was told that it had not committed a breach of the prices regulations, hut that the declaration by the Prices Commissioner would stand. The position now is that the Prices Branch in Brisbane admits that it cannot cope with the applications submitted by Moore's Silk Store for the fixing of prices. The branch told the management not to send more applications because it could not handle them. The management then decided to sell stocks without waiting for prices to be fixed by the branch, and it is now threatened with prosecution if it does so. This means that the store must be closed down until such time as the Prices Branch is able to handle the management's applications for the fixing of prices. In view of the admitted inability of the branch to deal with these applications, will the Minister representing the Minister for Trade and Customs take immediate action to have the Prices Commissioner's declaration rescinded, and thus terminate a state of affairs in which a small coterie of incompetent public servants is preventing the store from transacting business. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER</name>
</talker>
<para>- Order ! The honorable member must not cast reflections. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KYC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">POLLARD, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Mr POLLARD</name>
</talker>
<para>-I shall ask the Minister for Trade and Customs to ascertain whether action can be taken along the lines suggested by the honorable member, and I shall supply him with the information as soon as possible. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>483</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>POWER ALCOHOL</title>
<page.no>483</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Warracknabeal Distillery</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWP</name.id>
<electorate>WIMMERA, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TURNBULL, Winton</name>
<name role="display">Mr TURNBULL</name>
</talker>
<para>- Just before Par liament went into recess last December, I asked the Minister representing the Minister for Supply and Shipping if he could tell me whether the Government had any plans regarding the future use of the power alcohol distillery at Warracknabeal, Victoria. The honorable gentleman said that he would secure the information for me. This year, the big plied adjacent to the distillery is being used to store wheat hut the remainder of the expensive buildings and equipment are not being used, and it has been said in this House that their upkeep is costing £140 a week. As my question has remained unanswered since early December. I now ask the Minister whether he can make a statement regarding the Government's policy in connexion with this distillery. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I regret very much that I have not provided the honorable member with the information for which he asked before Christmas. The position is that there are four power alcohol distilleries, and that the Government entered into an agreement with the Colonial Sugar Refining Company Limited under which the company agreed to operate the distilleries, if required to do so, during the war. One of the conditions of the agreement is that the company has an option of purchase over any or all of the plants for a period of twelve months after the war, should the Government decide to dispose of them. In view of certain developments in connexion with jetpropelled aircraft and the defence pro gramme generally, it is not yet clear how many, if any, of the distilleries will be required for defence purposes in the postwar period. Discussions are now taking place with the Colonial Sugar Refining Company Limited to ascertain whether it will forgo its option of purchase or agree to reduce the period of the option from twelve months to three months. Investigations are also proceeding in an endeavour to estimate Australia's post-war requirements of power alcohol. Until these two matters are decided, finality cannot be reached regarding the disposal of the distilleries. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>483</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PARLIAMENT HOUSE</title>
<page.no>483</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Trunk Telephone Priorities</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L08</name.id>
<electorate>DALLEY, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ROSEVEAR, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER (Hon J S Rosevear</name>
</talker>
<para>- Yesterday, the honorable member for Fawkner asked me a question regarding the allotment of priority to telephone calls made from this building. I assume that the question relates to trunk-line calls and not local calls, which would be made through the Canberra automatic exchange. If this is correct, the matter is not one which comes under the control of the presiding officers. The granting of priority rights to persons making trunk-line calls is administered by the Postmaster-General's Department ; but if the honorable member will give me further particulars by letter, I shall take up the matter with the PostmasterGeneral on behalf of all honorable members. </para>