/
19570508_reps_22_hor15.xml
4769 lines (4769 loc) · 492 KB
/
19570508_reps_22_hor15.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1957-05-08</date>
<parliament.no>22</parliament.no>
<session.no>2</session.no>
<period.no>1</period.no>
<chamber>REPS</chamber>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<business.start>
<day.start>1957-05-08</day.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. John McLeay)</inline>took the chair at 2,30 p.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>IMMIGRATION</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Petition</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. PEARCE</inline>presented a petition from the United Protestant Association of Queensland praying that the Parliament give immediate consideration to a temporary cessation of the intake of Southern European migrants to allow more people of British and Northern European stock to settle in Australia. </para>
<para>Petition received and read. </para>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>ILLNESS OF PRIME MINISTER</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4T</name.id>
<electorate>MCPHERSON, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role>Treasurer</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FADDEN, Arthur William</name>
<name role="display">Sir ARTHUR FADDEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- With the concurrence of the House, I desire to announce to honorable members that, as requested by the Leader of the Opposition yesterday, I have conveyed to the Prime Minister the best wishes of the House for his early and complete recovery from his illness. The Prime Minister has asked me to thank the Leader of the Opposition and honorable members for their concern for him, and to say that he is looking forward to being able to return to his office as soon as the state of his health permits. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DEFENCE MISSION TO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>DTN</name.id>
<electorate>BARTON, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">EVATT, Herbert Vere</name>
<name role="display">Dr EVATT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I desire to ask the Minister for Defence a question about a proposal, or a plan, for him to visit the United States of America in connexion with the purchase of defence equipment. Can the Minister elaborate a little on this matter so that the House may be informed from the correct source instead of through the press? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOL</name.id>
<electorate>WAKEFIELD, SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Defence</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCBRIDE, Philip</name>
<name role="display">Sir PHILIP MCBRIDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- No official announcement of a visit by any mission to the U.S.A. has yet been made. When such a mission is decided upon, an announcement will be made. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>DTN</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">EVATT, Herbert Vere</name>
<name role="display">Dr Evatt</name>
</talker>
<para>- Does the Minister mean that such a mission has not yet been decided upon? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOL</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCBRIDE, Philip</name>
<name role="display">Sir PHILIP MCBRIDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I said that no official announcement had been made. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PARLIAMENT HOUSE</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KDT</name.id>
<electorate>FARRER, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FAIRBAIRN, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr FAIRBAIRN</name>
</talker>
<para>- 1 desire to direct a question to you. <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker.</inline> In explanation, I should like to state that several of my constituents have recently informed me that they attempted to telephone me while I was at Parliament House, and were unable to reach me. In addition, when I was away from the building on one occasion, I tried to communicate with two members whom I knew to be present, but 1 was unable to do so. f ask whether you are satisfied that the paging system is satisfactory. If not, will you consider increasing the volume slightly where necessary? Will you also instruct the telephone operators to see that parts of the building which have no paging system, such as the library, are checked when a member cannot be found? Would it be possible to ascertain, occasionally, what percentage of the calls made to members present at Parliament House are received by them? Is a list of the members who are absent on any day given to the telephone operators so that callers can be advised of their absence? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER</name>
</talker>
<para>-I shall have a look at the matter raised by the honorable member, and if necessary I shall confer with my colleague in another place and we shall advise the honorable member in due course. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>IMPORT LICENSING</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L0F</name.id>
<electorate>GREY, SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RUSSELL, Edgar</name>
<name role="display">Mr RUSSELL</name>
</talker>
<para>- I address a question without notice to the Minister for Trade. Has the right honorable gentleman's attention been directed to a statement, attributed to a member of the consultative committee on import policy, that Australia should strive to find a better solution to her balance of payment problems than the periodic imposition of import restrictions? This gentleman said that the control of imports by the issue of licences was a clumsy interference with individual initiative and was liable to serious abuse. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER</name>
</talker>
<para>- Order! What is the honorable member's question? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RUSSELL, Edgar</name>
<name role="display">Mr RUSSELL</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am about to ask it. I desire to ask the right honorable gentleman whether he agrees with that statement, and, if not, whether he does not think that some better and more equitable system of import controls than that at present operating could be introduced. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MB</name.id>
<electorate>MURRAY, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role>Minister for Trade</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCEWEN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr McEWEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Referring to the statement made by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. W.</inline> S. Kelly, for whose opinions 1 have great respect- </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RUSSELL, Edgar</name>
<name role="display">Mr Russell</name>
</talker>
<para>- I did not name him. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCEWEN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr McEWEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member named him yesterday. Import regulation is an objectionable administrative arrangement. The Government itself concedes that readily. It exists only because of the overriding necessity of preserving the international solvency of the country. The truth of the matter is that, during the period of office of this Government, the Australian citizens have attained such high prosperity, capacity to spend, and standards of living, and the tempo of development both in the public sector and the private sector has been so great, that the end result has been a demand for imports exceeding the earning capacity of our exports. That is the situation, and the Government has devoted itself primarily to policies encouraging the earning of export income - with very considerable success, as the figures show. But in the meantime, and as no more than a stop-gap to be entertained only so long as it is unavoidable, import licensing has been chosen as the device for preserving the international solvency of the country and the value of our currency. It will not be retained for any longer than there is necessity for it. That is the simple explanation of the situation. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>I know it has been suggested by the gentleman who is quoted that tariffs should be used as a substitute for import licensing. On that I say that more than half of the total imports into this country are the requirements of Australian manufacturers and that to try to curtail the volume of requirements of Australian manufacturers, by the device of loading them with additional tariffs would seem to be quite contrary to the general public interest of Australia, as well as that of the manufacturing community. I am sure that the Government is right in choosing import licensing, wretched as it is, as the best device in our national circumstances. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TOBACCO</title>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JRB</name.id>
<electorate>INDI, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BOSTOCK, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr BOSTOCK</name>
</talker>
<para>- I wish to ask the Minister for Primary Industry a question. In explanation, let me say that I have been informed that the prices paid for tobacco- </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER</name>
</talker>
<para>-Order! There is too much audible conversation. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JRB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BOSTOCK, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr BOSTOCK</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am informed thai the prices paid for tobacco grown in Queensland are greater than the prices paid for tobacco of the same quality grown in Victoria. I ask the Minister whether this is so, and if it is so, whether he can explain this price difference. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MA</name.id>
<electorate>LOWE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Primary Industry</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCMAHON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr McMAHON</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is correct to say that the prices paid for tobacco leaf in Queensland are greater than those paid for tobacco leaf in certain parts of Victoria. I am not prepared to enter into a discussion of the reasons given by various interests. Some people say that the smoking quality of Queensland leaf is a little better than the smoking quality of Victorian leaf, and vice versa. Others say that because of certain transport difficulties, and because of the need to encourage the production of Queensland leaf, a small premium should be given. There are several considerations which enter into this discussion, which is not one that the Government willingly enters into, but which it leaves to the two parties to work out for themselves. What I should like to say to the honorable member is that I think that this year the returns to Queensland producers have been excellent, and I have every expectation that this year also the prices paid to the Victorian growers will certainly not be disappointing. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>HUNGARY</title>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>6V4</name.id>
<electorate>GRAYNDLER, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DALY, Fred</name>
<name role="display">Mr DALY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct a question to the Minister for External Affairs. Is it a fact that the United Nations General Assembly passed ten resolutions condemning the crimes of the Soviet Union and the Kadar Government in Hungary, and that these resolutions have been totally defied? Is it also a fact that when United Nations observers were barred from Hungary the United Nations General Assembly finally set up a commission to hear eye-witness accounts of events in Hungary from refugees abroad, as well as from newsmen and neutral observers, and that this commission has finished its investigations and has begun to compile its report? Is it further true that every day's delay means that more people in Hungary are persecuted and condemned to deportation or death without even the help of protests from world public opinion, or the United Nations? If these are facts, and as the Hungarian revolution will be cold history by next September, when the next regular session of the General Assembly is scheduled to be held, will the Minister make urgent representations to have the present session of the General Assembly reconvened immediately in order to hear the report of the special commission on Hungary, and to take action regarding it? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWE</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for External Affairs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CASEY, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Mr CASEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- A general, broad answer to the numerous questions asked by the honorable gentleman is: Yes, those things are broadly true. The United Nations General Assembly established a special committee consisting of representatives of five countries - Australia, Ceylon, Denmark, Uruguay and Tunisia - to investigate the spontaneous uprising in Hungary in October and November of last year and to report back to the Assembly. Australia appointed its Ambassador to the Philippines, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Shann,</inline> as its representative on that committee, and <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Shann</inline> became the rapporteur of the committee. The committee has had hearings in New York, London, Geneva, Vienna and Rome - I think that is the full list of the capitals in Europe in which it had its hearings - and its report is now in course of compilation. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>It is expected that the report will be available towards the end of this month. As soon as it is received it will, of course, be transmitted to the governments concerned, including the Australian Government. It will be examined rapidly and then the governments, or the Secretary-General of the United Nations, plus the general committee, together with the president of the present 11th session of the General Assembly, will decide whether or not the present Assembly should be reconvened - because the assembly is still technically and formally in existence and can be reconvened at relatively short notice. I think that reconvening of the Assembly takes only a matter of a few days, which are necessary for the despatch of the requisite telegrams to the various governments and the obtaining of agreement to reconvene. Not only will the report of the special committee have been received by then, and be taken into account by the reconvened Assembly, but also the reports received from Australia and other countries that have accepted Hungarian refugees will also be taken into account. Australia, of course, had an investigation on this matter, at its end, and I have already laid on the table the relevant report which, 1 expect, has been read by a number of honorable members, lt is an extremely interesting report. Such report: will have been taken into account by this special committee and, I expect, will find some space in the report eventually submitted by it to the General Assembly. I cannot say more than that. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>DTN</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">EVATT, Herbert Vere</name>
<name role="display">Dr Evatt</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Secretary-General of the United Nations now in Hungary? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWE</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CASEY, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Mr CASEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not believe so. 1 believe that the Secretary-General, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Hammarskjoeld,</inline> is in New York at the moment, but I am not absolutely certain of that. However, I will undertake that the representation made by the honorable member is taken into serious account by the Government when the time comes to consider the reconvening of the present Assembly. That means that this report will not then have to wait until next September, when the next Assembly convenes. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>IMMIGRANTS AND PRIMARY INDUSTRY</title>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KDS</name.id>
<electorate>LAWSON, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FAILES, Laurence</name>
<name role="display">Mr FAILES</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for Immigration: Is it possible to indicate the number of immigrants who have been settled in country districts in relation to the total number which enters Australia yearly? What proportion of the new immigrants are being absorbed by the primary industries? What means is the Department of Immigration employing to encourage new Australians to settle in decentralized areas? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWH</name.id>
<electorate>DENISON, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Immigration</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TOWNLEY, Athol</name>
<name role="display">Mr TOWNLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I cannot answer the honorable member's question offhand, because it involves far too many figures, but 1 shall be pleased to let him have any statistics that are available. The only figure that comes readily to my mind is that, of all the people recruited for the rural industries during the last three or four years, about 70 per cent, have been new settlers from other countries. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TARIFF BOARD REPORTS</title>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KXZ</name.id>
<electorate>SCULLIN, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PETERS, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr PETERS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether he will have laid on the table of the House, as early as possible, all of the Tariff Board reports now in the hands of the appropriate Minister. Further, will he suggest to the Minister that any further Tariff Board reports that come into his- hands before the end of the present sessional period be placed on the table of the House before the recess? </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4T</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FADDEN, Arthur William</name>
<name role="display">Sir Arthur Fadden</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Minister for Trade will answer the question. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCEWEN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr McEWEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- There is a number of Tariff Board reports which can be tabled shortly. 1 undertake to table all reports, subject to a reservation which I shall mention. Those that can be tabled will be tabled before this sessional period ends, but 1 cannot undertake to table, before the sessional period ends, every Tariff Board report that has been presented, for a reason which, I am sure, the Parliament will understand, lt is a reason that has been traditionally understood by the Parliament. The Tariff Board's function is to report to the Government, but there is no obligation upon the Government to accept the board's report. That is an historic fact. The Government cannot decide whether it will accept or reject a report until that report has been examined at its own level - often an inter-departmental officials level. If a report recommended a substantial increase in duty, it would be quite improper to reveal that fact before the Government had decided to take the appropriate parliamentary steps to increase the duty - in short, to make the whole business community aware that a substantial increase in duty had been recommended. But to permit a hiatus to occur between the publication of the recommendation and the Government's decision to take action would, of course, lend itself to taking advantage of a " release from bond " situation, which no government in the history of this country has ever condoned. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE</title>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JMF</name.id>
<electorate>PHILLIP, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASTON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr ASTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I preface my question to the Minister for Air by referring to my personal representations on behalf of Aircraftman Hickey, who resides in my electorate. Considerable publicity has been given to Aircraftman Hickey's allegations that he did not receive speedy or adequate medical treatment from the Royal Australian Air Force after an accident, and further, that his parents were not notified of his admission to hospital. Can the Minister say when the inquiry into this matter is expected to be completed and a reply to my representations given? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMD</name.id>
<electorate>EVANS, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Air</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">OSBORNE, Frederick</name>
<name role="display">Mr OSBORNE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I regret that the honorable member has not already received a final reply. Inquiries are proceeding, but they are not yet complete. However, I can give the honorable member an interim answer now. I think that three separate complaints were made about this young man, who was a national service trainee in the Air Force and was involved in a motor accident while proceeding to Newcastle from Rathmines. The first complaint was, I think, that his parents were not informed. Preliminary inquiries show that they were informed by telephone, either on the morning after the accident or the morning after that - I am not clear which. At any rate, within a comparatively short time they were informed by telephone of the fact that he had been involved in an accident. It is probably correct to say that they did not get any formal written notice, but I am not aware that it has ever been an invariable practice of my department to give written notice in these matters. It seems to me that the important thing is to give effective notice. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>The next complaint was that he did not receive adequate treatment. He was taken to hospital in Newcastle and X-rayed immediately after the accident. His facial injuries were stitched up and he was returned by ambulance to the Air Force hospital, so it hardly seems likely that he did not get correct treatment at the time. The next complaint was that he had a broken bone in his face. He has now a broken bone in his face, but whether he got it as a result of the motor accident, or as a result of later events, is open to some doubt, as honorable members may realize in a moment. The final complaint was that he was forced to attend a bivouac when he was not fit to do so. The fact is that, some seven days before he went on the bivouac, he was asked by his superior officer whether he was in a fit state to attend or not, and he preferred to attend. The records also show that he took part in a passing-out parade of his unit and afterwards danced all night before he went home. Though I can understand the anxiety of the parents, from all that I have heard about this young man, he is an average virile, strong and healthy young Australian and fairly well able to look after himself. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>IMMIGRATION</title>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K9M</name.id>
<electorate>HUGHES, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSON, Leslie</name>
<name role="display">Mr L R JOHNSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for Immigration whether his attention has been directed to the fact that last year about 38,000 immigrants left Australia for their place of origin, or for some other country. Is he aware that though Britons accounted for 41 per cent, of arrivals, they also accounted for 80 per cent, of departures? Has any attempt been made to establish the factors contributing to this high departure rate and, if so, are the principal reasons, first, the lack of suitable accommodation because of the housing crisis and, secondly, the chronic difficulty experienced by immigrants in obtaining suitable employment? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TOWNLEY, Athol</name>
<name role="display">Mr TOWNLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member's so-called facts are all wrong. The pertinent statistics show that permanent arrivals in Australia have been of the order of 1,150,000, of whom 950,000 have come from northern Europe, and 550,000 have been British nationals. This country receives more British immigrants than Canada and New Zealand put together. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KX7</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WARD, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr Ward</name>
</talker>
<para>- We lose more, too! </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TOWNLEY, Athol</name>
<name role="display">Mr TOWNLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member for East Sydney has probably been misled by the Commonwealth Statistician's figures. The Statistician puts down under departures every one who goes overseas for a period of twelve months or more. For instance, a doctor may be going- </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>6U4</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WHITLAM, Gough</name>
<name role="display">Mr Whitlam</name>
</talker>
<para>- And " arrivals " include those who have been abroad and are returning. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TOWNLEY, Athol</name>
<name role="display">Mr TOWNLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- They do not. If the honorable member will examine the Commonwealth Statistician's figures he will see at the bottom of the page a caution that the figures are not meant to be applied to immigration. The department has information showing that though about 6 per cent, of British immigrants have returned to the United Kingdom, a substantial number of these have either come back or are now applying for permission to come back. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NEW SERVICE RIFLE</title>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYO</name.id>
<electorate>SWAN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEAVER, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Mr CLEAVER</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Minister for Supply and Defence Production prepared to comment on the announcement by the United States Army of the adoption of the T.44 rifle as a new, standard weapon? </para>
</talk.start>
<para>Despite the Minister's recent assurance regarding the FN. 30 rifle and the standardization of ammunition with that of the United States forces, this recent move could be taken as indicating that Australia's planned production is already outdated. I should be relieved to know that that is not so. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JOI</name.id>
<electorate>PARRAMATTA, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Supply</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BEALE, Oliver</name>
<name role="display">Mr BEALE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I saw a report about this matter, and asked the American Embassy to supply me with a copy of the official report. The embassy has done so. It is true that the American army is standardizing upon the new rifle mentioned. There was some disappointment in some quarters that the United States of America has not seen fit to standardize on the F.N. rifle as Great Britain and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization powers, as well as Canada and Australia, have done. However, that is entirely a matter for the United States. The important thing is that their rifle takes the same ammunition as the F.N. rifle, so that there is complete interchangeability in the most important element, which is the ammunition. The decision of the Government of the United States has had no effect at all on Australian planning. We propose to push ahead with the decision to make the F.N. rifle in this country as fast as we can. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>BV8</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CALWELL, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr Calwell</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the American rifle better? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JOI</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BEALE, Oliver</name>
<name role="display">Mr BEALE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The American rifle is only marginally different from the Australian rifle. The suggestion which the Deputy Leader of the Opposition made last night that the American rifle is very much better than the F.N. rifle, is quite wrong. The official statement of the American authorities concedes that there are only marginal differences between the performances of the two rifles. The Australian and British Governments, and the governments of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization powers, are completely satisfied with the performance with the F.N. rifle. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE</title>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUX</name.id>
<electorate>LANG, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">STEWART, Francis</name>
<name role="display">Mr STEWART</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Treasurer aware that on Saturday afternoon last the Council of the Municipality of Bankstown officially opened a sewage disposal depot, which cost in the vicinity of £250,000 to erect, and which was made necessary by the lack of sewerage in the municipality? Is he also aware that the Municipality of Bankstown. which is situated approximately 12 miles from the City of Sydney, performs no fewer than 29,500 services each week for the householders of the municipality? Does the right honorable gentleman recall that, together with other honorable members whose electorates cover the Municipality of Bankstown, I have made repeated requests for a special grant of money to be made available to the Bankstown Council for the provision of sewerage in the municipality? Is he aware that the Metropolitan Water Sewerage and Drainage Board of New South Wales could double the amount of mains it is laying each week, but is unable to make any increase because of the shortage of finance? Will the right honorable gentleman give urgent and sympathetic consideration to making a special grant of money available to the Council of the Municipality of Bankstown for the provision of sewerage? If he cannot make the grant immediately will he give an assurance that the submissions of the Premier of New South Wales at the next Loan Council in relation to loan money for the Metropolitan Water and Sewerage Board will be given favorable consideration? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4T</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FADDEN, Arthur William</name>
<name role="display">Sir ARTHUR FADDEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member's question should be directed to the Premier of New South Wales. The local authority to which he refers is a State instrumentality under the control and jurisdiction of the New South Wales Government. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>IMMIGRANTS AND PRIMARY INDUSTRY</title>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCS</name.id>
<electorate>NEW ENGLAND, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DRUMMOND, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr DRUMMOND</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the attention of the Minister for Immigration been directed to the fact that at the annual conference of the New Citizenship Convention no provision has been made in the past for specific proposals to be considered by special committees in relation to problems of employment on the land as they affect immigrant settlers? In view of the great importance of primary industry to Australia, will the Minister consider discussing with the organizers of that extremely valuable conference a programme in which recognition will be given to the great importance of primary industries and of the employment of immigrants therein? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TOWNLEY, Athol</name>
<name role="display">Mr TOWNLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- No, I have not seen the statement to which the honorable member has referred; but I will have it brought to my attention as soon as it is possible to do so and will give consideration to the propositions made. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SCRAP IRON</title>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K8B</name.id>
<electorate>KINGSFORD-SMITH, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CURTIN, Daniel</name>
<name role="display">Mr CURTIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is directed to the Minister for Trade. Is it a fact thai a certain gentleman is making a systematic canvass of all the capital cities of Australia in a search for scrap iron? Is it a fact that this gentleman is paying £2 a ton above the ruling rate to corner all the scrap iron available? Can the Minister tell the House whether this gentleman is an agent for the Japanese Government and is being paid a royalty of £5 a ton on all purchases of scrap iron exported to Japan? Is it a fact that this gentleman enjoys the privilege of a special export licence which enables him to export to Japan unlimited scrap iron, to the detriment of the steel industry in Australia, which is suffering from a severe shortage of scrap iron in consequence? Could it be that the high prices paid by the Japanese Government for scrap iron is the cause of the unbalance of payments between Japan and Australia, about which the Prime Minister complained recently? Further, is it a coincidence that excessive exports of scrap iron to Japan always occur during the term of a Liberal government? If so, why? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCEWEN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr McEWEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not a clue as to what the honorable gentleman is talking about. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K8B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CURTIN, Daniel</name>
<name role="display">Mr Curtin</name>
</talker>
<para>- If you want the name of the gentleman, I can give it to you. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCEWEN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr McEWEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I invite the honorable gentleman to do so. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1140</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K8B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />