/
19590414_reps_23_hor23.xml
4131 lines (4131 loc) · 361 KB
/
19590414_reps_23_hor23.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1959-04-14</date>
<parliament.no>23</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>1</period.no>
<chamber>REPS</chamber>
<page.no>1133</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<business.start>
<day.start>1959-04-14</day.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr.</inline>SPEAKER (Hon. John McLeay) took the chair at 2.30 p.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>SOCIAL SERVICE BENEFITS</title>
<page.no>1133</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Petition</title>
<page.no>1133</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr.</inline>McIVOR presented a petition from certain electors in the States of the Commonwealth praying that the House will take immediate steps to increase social service benefits for mothers and their children. </para>
<para>Petition received and read. </para>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1133</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SOUTH-EAST ASIA TREATY ORGANIZATION</title>
<page.no>1133</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1133</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>DTN</name.id>
<electorate>HUNTER, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">EVATT, Herbert Vere</name>
<name role="display">Dr EVATT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for External Affairs a question without notice. Can the Minister give the House any detailed information about the recent conference in New Zealand of the South-East Asia Treaty Organization? Could the Minister prepare a paper on the conference for the information of the House and for prospective debate? Does the Minister think that two or three days is sufficient time for such a conference to last? Is not some more lengthy consideration required of the matters dealt with by the conference? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1133</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWE</name.id>
<electorate></electorate>
<party></party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CASEY, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Mr CASEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Seato conference, of course, is a confidential conference held behind closed doors for the greater part. A communique was issued at the end of it, and I shall be very glad to relay it in full to the right honorable gentleman and to other honorable members who may care to see it. Without rehearsing the contents of the final communique, I can say with truth that the meeting in Wellington, New Zealand, was a most valuable one. I do not think that any of the previous four meetings of Seato were more valuable than this meeting. It suffered to an appreciable extent by the absence, which was universally regretted, of <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. John</inline> Foster Dulles, who unfortunately was unable to be present at a Seato conference for the first time since the originating meeting in Manila in 1954. I tend to agree with the right honorable gentleman that the time of three days - three full days it was - is rather too restricted a period for such a conference. It is my intention, with the agreement of the Government, to endeavour to arrange in the future that the meeting shall be held over four, if not five, days. The opportunities for personal contact are limited in the three days, which are very fully occupied with the formal business oi Seato, leaving insufficient time for the many private contacts which, I think, appreciably make for the usefulness of the Seato connexion. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1133</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TAXATION IN PAPUA AND NEW GUINEA</title>
<page.no>1133</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1133</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JMF</name.id>
<electorate>PHILLIP, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASTON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr ASTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask my question of the Minister for Territories. Is it the intention of the Administrator of Papua and New Guinea to introduce into the Legislative Council this week a bill to impose income tax on the residents of New Guinea and Papua? If so, is this the result of this Government's decision? Further, will the report made by civil servants on this subject be made available and an opportunity given for debate by members of this House? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1133</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>ZL6</name.id>
<electorate>CURTIN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Territories</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HASLUCK, Paul</name>
<name role="display">Mr HASLUCK</name>
</talker>
<para>- There has been so much misunderstanding about this matter that I hope I can answer the honorable member's question by making two or three rather simple explanations. The first explanation I will try to give is in relation to the exact nature of the decision made by the Government. As honorable members know, the budget of the Territory of Papua and New Guinea is financed partly by a grant from this Parliament and partly by revenues raised locally. Over the past ten years, the total expenditure has quadrupled and local revenues have also increased fourfold, so that whereas ten years ago a little over £1,200,000 was raised, to-day about £5,000,000 is raised locally. Practically the whole of the £5,000,000 being raised at present comes from import and export duties levied under the Papua and New Guinea customs. The decision which the Government has taken and which can be put into effect only by legislation in the Territory is to abolish export duties altogether, to make some downward adjustments in import duties and to introduce income taxation. The income taxation will be introduced at a level very much below the level of income taxation in Australia, and the concessional deductions which will be allowed will also be on a far more liberal scale than is known in Australia and will take account of the special conditions in </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Papua and New Guinea. It is a decision to change the method of raising revenue - not to introduce some new notion of taxation and not to attempt to increase the total burden of revenue-raising that falls on the Territory. </para>
<para>The second explanation I should like to give relates to the processes by which the decision was reached. First of all, as I promised this House, a basic review of the methods of raising revenue was made by officers of the Department of Territories and other Commonwealth departments, in association with officers of the Territorial Administration. They produced a document which was devised as a departmental document for purely official purposes, but in order to draw on as wide a level of experience as I could, arrangements were made for that document to be tabled in the Legislative Council for the Territory of Papua and New Guinea. For more than seven or eight months now that document has been public property and has been subject to comment. Before reaching its final decision - the decision which I have explained to this House - the Government took into account not only the facts and figures that had been produced by its own departmental officers, but also every set of facts and figures and all the arguments that had been adduced by the interested parties in the course of discussion over a period of some months. </para>
<para>Consequent on the taking of the decision by the Government, the Administrator will introduce not another document as has been suggested in the press, but the legislation which will give effect to the decision. That legislation will be introduced on 20th April. The debate will be adjourned so that the legislation may be studied by people in the Territory, and the debate will be resumed in June. If the Legislative Council passes the legislation, the new taxation will come into effect. I would respectfully suggest to the honorable member, <inline font-weight="bold">Sir, that</inline> while this legislation is before the Legislative Council for the Territory, this House itself should not attempt to intervene in the debate. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1134</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PARLIAMENTARY SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES</title>
<page.no>1134</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1134</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>2V4</name.id>
<electorate>HINDMARSH, SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CAMERON, Clyde</name>
<name role="display">Mr CLYDE CAMERON</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question without notice is directed to the Prime </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Minister. If he has not already done so, will the right honorable gentleman consider legislating for a provision that will enable members and ex-members of the Parliament who will benefit from any increased pensions or allowances that may be proposed and who, in conscience or for any other reason, real or unreal, feel unable to accept the increase, to refund them to the Treasury? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1134</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>N76</name.id>
<electorate>KOOYONG, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Prime Minister</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MENZIES, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Mr MENZIES</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am indebted to the honorable member for the suggestion to which I will give the closest possible attention. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1134</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>HERCULES AIRCRAFT</title>
<page.no>1134</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1134</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMB</name.id>
<electorate>CORIO, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">OPPERMAN, Hubert</name>
<name role="display">Mr OPPERMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct a question to the Minister for the Army. Has the Minister any comment to offer concerning the alleged differences of opinion between the chiefs of staff of the Army and the Royal Australian Air Force concerning the use of Hercules aircraft? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1134</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7J</name.id>
<electorate>BENNELONG, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for the Army</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CRAMER, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr CRAMER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The first comment I want to make is that I was staggered when I saw an article in the " Sydney Morning Herald " yesterday containing such an allegation. I was very pleased indeed to see the allegation categorically denied by the chiefs of staff of the Army and the Air Force. I know of no conflict. I have consulted my colleague the Minister for Air and there is no conflict whatever over this matter. As a matter of fact, all that the Army requires of the R.A.A.F. in relation to the brigade exercises at Mackay is being provided by the Air Force in respect of the C.130. Other questions in connexion with this matter should be directed to the Minister for Air. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1134</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TELEVISION</title>
<page.no>1134</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1134</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYJ</name.id>
<electorate>ST GEORGE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLAY, Lionel</name>
<name role="display">Mr CLAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I preface a question to the Postmaster-General by stating that recently television station ATN produced a play entitled " Johnny Belinda " with an allAustralian cast. This play proved to be very popular with the viewing public, and also proved beyond shadow of doubt that when Australian artists are provided with the opportunity, they are equal if not superior to the artists of any other country. Will the Postmaster-General consider a request of all other television stations that they follow the example set by station ATN in producing more all-Australian plays? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCA</name.id>
<electorate>DAWSON, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role>Postmaster-General</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DAVIDSON, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr DAVIDSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have seen the production to which the honorable member has referred. Arrangements were made for it to be shown here last week. I agree that the production by ATN was a very laudable one and its example is something which could be followed, and I know will be followed, by other stations which are actuated by the same desire and will continue steadily to build up the use of Australian talent. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PARLIAMENT HOUSE</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>0095J</name.id>
<electorate>FAWKNER, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOWSON, Peter</name>
<name role="display">Mr HOWSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is directed to you, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker.</inline> It has been reported that visitors to the Speaker's gallery in the Canadian Parliament are provided with charts showing the seating plan of the House. This enables them to take a greater interest in the proceedings. Will you arrange for an investigation to be carried out, to see whether a similar facility could be provided for visitors to the public gallery of this House? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I assure the honorable member that I will consider the matter that he has raised, and I will advise him in due course of any decision reached. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TRADE UNION ELECTION</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JPE</name.id>
<electorate>BATMAN, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BIRD, Alan</name>
<name role="display">Mr BIRD</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is directed to the Minister for Labour and National Service. Is it a fact that some Victorian members of the Federated Ironworkers Association of Australia have forwarded to the registrar of the Commonwealth Industrial Court statutory declarations concerning certain events which occurred during the 1958 union election conducted by the Commonwealth Electoral Officer, and suggesting that action be taken under section 171 of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act? </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCMAHON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr McMahon</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the honorable member referring to the election at Yallourn? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JPE</name.id>
<electorate>BATMAN, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BIRD, Alan</name>
<name role="display">Mr BIRD</name>
</talker>
<para>- No. This was in connexion with the union's Australian elections late last year. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCMAHON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr McMahon</name>
</talker>
<para>- In New South Wales? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JPE</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BIRD, Alan</name>
<name role="display">Mr BIRD</name>
</talker>
<para>- And Victoria. If this is a fact, what consideration has been given to these submissions, and what decision has been arrived at? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCMAHON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr McMAHON</name>
</talker>
<para>- Some allegations have been made - I believe by members of a particular political group - to the effect that there had been some wrongful action in connexion with the holding of the Federated Ironworkers Association's ballots, particularly in Wollongong and in some parts of Victoria. Some statutory declarations were obtained from most of the individuals concerned. An investigation was carried out by my department. I have gone through each of the statutory declarations presented - or at least those that had been presented two weeks ago - and, on the advice of the department, I came to the conclusion that no cause exists for recommending to the Attorney-General that further action by the Commonwealth be taken. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SOUTH-EAST ASIA TREATY ORGANIZATION</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>4U4</name.id>
<electorate>MORETON, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KILLEN, James</name>
<name role="display">Mr KILLEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is addressed to the Minister for External Affairs, and it is supplementary to that asked by the Leader of the Opposition. Will the right honorable gentleman consider preparing and making a statement to the House on the South-East Asia Treaty Organization, showing precisely what progress has been made by that organization since its establishment? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWE</name.id>
<electorate></electorate>
<party></party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CASEY, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Mr CASEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Yes, I shall endeavour to do so. One is restricted a little because the business of Seato is conducted in secret and, by agreement, all that is made public are the final communiques at the end of each annual ministerial meeting. However, I will see what can be done in the direction that the honorable member suggests. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ALLEGATIONS AGAINST MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT</title>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K97</name.id>
<electorate>KINGSTON, SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GALVIN, Patrick</name>
<name role="display">Mr GALVIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Prime Minister confer with <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker</inline> with the object of ascertaining whether it is possible to investigate in any way the very serious allegations, including that of bribery, which have recently been made through the press by a certain <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Somerville</inline> Smith? If there is no committee of this House which could conduct such an investigation, will the Prime Minister see whether it would be possible, or worth while, to bring this gentleman to the bar of the House to elaborate on these allegations of bribery, which reflect in a very adverse manner, not only on the members of this House, but also on the House itself? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>N76</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MENZIES, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Mr MENZIES</name>
</talker>
<para>- Allegations of bribery, perhaps, fall into two classes. Sometimes allegations are made by responsible people in circumstances that call for investigation. Sometimes they are made quite chronically by people who are irresponsible and who are seeking only for publicity by the making of them. I decline to treat any allegation made by this gentleman with any seriousness at all. His history is well known to honorable members and I would not regard myself as justified in asking the House to take up any time with him. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA</title>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>DB6</name.id>
<electorate>MACKELLAR, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WENTWORTH, William Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr WENTWORTH</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct a question to the Minister for External Affairs. Is it the practice of Soviet legations to send throughout the countries in which they are situated voluminous and unsolicited correspondence addressed to refugees or migrants from iron curtain countries? Is it a fact that, in the absence of a Soviet legation in Australia, this correspondence has been addressed to migrants in Australia by the Soviet Legation in New Zealand? Will the Minister investigate and report to the House on the nature and extent of this practice? Is it a fact that, so far from this correspondence being welcomed by its recipients, it is usually received with disgust and apprehension? Finally, if a Soviet legation is to be established in Australia, will the Minister take steps to see that it is not made a centre for such undesirable practices? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWE</name.id>
<electorate></electorate>
<party></party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CASEY, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Mr CASEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Yes; the Soviet Legation in Wellington has been, I think for some years, the centre for the sending out of Communist propaganda to a number of addressees in Australia. These are not by any means confined to migrants. Members of my own department, amongst others, are constant recipients of this material, a good deal of which I have seen from time to time. I must say that in my judgment it is remarkably deficient in what one might call ideological sex-appeal, and I would not see any very great reason to protest very strenuously against it. So far as the potential Soviet diplomatic post in Australia is concerned, there is an accepted international practice that diplomatic posts restrain themselves in respect of the dissemination of ideological propaganda in the countries to which they are accredited, and I would certainly expect the Soviet Government to be well aware of this convention and to abide by it. I made no such stipulation with <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Firubin</inline> when I had a number of discussions with him in Queensland not very long ago on behalf of the Government, but I would think that the situation could be left in the way that I have described it. I would not expect the Soviet diplomatic post here to go beyond the normally accepted limits in that regard. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>LOW-FLYING AIRCRAFT</title>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KYS</name.id>
<electorate>BARTON, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">REYNOLDS, Leonard</name>
<name role="display">Mr REYNOLDS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Minister representing the Minister for Civil Aviation aware of the distress caused to patients in the St. George district hospital, Kogarah, one of the largest hospitals in New South Wales, by low-flying aircraft approaching and1 departing from Kingsford-Smith aerodrome? Is he aware, too, that large schools and the technical college in thi same vicinity suffer much distraction from these aircraft? I know that this matter has been raised on a number of occasions, and I ask the Minister whether he will examine the possibility of more of these aircraft being diverted out over Botany Bay. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWH</name.id>
<electorate>DENISON, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Defence</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TOWNLEY, Athol</name>
<name role="display">Mr TOWNLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall be pleased to convey the honorable member's question to my colleague in another place and get a full answer to it. I must point out, however, that an aircraft can hardly come in to land without flying low. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NEW SERVICE RIFLE</title>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVR</name.id>
<electorate>DARLING DOWNS, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SWARTZ, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Mr SWARTZ</name>
</talker>
<para>- I address a question to the Minister for the Army, with reference to the Minister's recent statement that a battalion of the Royal Australian Regiment is being equipped with Australianmade FN .30 rifles. Will the remainder of the permanent Brigade Group in Australia be equipped with these Australian-made weapons as soon as they become available? Will the Minister also give consideration to the provision of a small number of FN .30 rifles to each unit of the Citizen Military Forces at the earliest possible date, so that units may become partly familiar with this new rifle before it becomes available for general issue to them? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7J</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CRAMER, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr CRAMER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The reply to the first two questions asked by the honorable member is, " Yes ". I think he knows that the first priority for the FN rifle is the fitting out of the infantry brigade group. In addition to that, some rifles are supplied to each of the commands so that at least samples of the rifles are available. I hope that before very long we shall be able to supply at least some rifles to the more important units of the Citizen Military Forces. I agree with the honorable member that as soon as it is possible, the FN rifle should be available to the C.M.F., not in full quantity at once, of course, but so that they may be able to become accustomed to it. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K9M</name.id>
<electorate>HUGHES, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSON, Leslie</name>
<name role="display">Mr L R JOHNSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I wish to ask the Minister for the Army a question supplementary to the one he has just answered. Will the Minister comment on reports that the British Army is now being equipped with a Britishproduced 7.62 mm., selfloading rifle, which is said to have super seded the Belgiandesigned FN weapon? Will he indicate the relative merits of the new British weapon and the Australian FN rifle? Will the honorable gentleman also express his view on whether or not the new British rifle is superior in any way to the one with which the Australian Army is now being equipped? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7J</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CRAMER, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr CRAMER</name>
</talker>
<para>- As I understand the position, the United Kingdom authorities have adopted the 7.62 FN rifle, as we have. As a matter of fact the refinements which are now embodied in this rifle as against the original model manufactured were tried out in Great Britain. I am unaware of any other rifle with which the United Kingdom is experimenting. All the North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries have adopted the FN rifle, and this rifle, as we know it in Australia, is, at the moment, in course of production in the United Kingdom. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TELEVISION</title>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWP</name.id>
<electorate>MALLEE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TURNBULL, Winton</name>
<name role="display">Mr TURNBULL</name>
</talker>
<para>- By way of explana tion I preface my question to the PostmasterGeneral by saying that I have been told, and I have heard people telling others, that television stations, or booster stations for television, will be built at <inline font-weight="bold">Mr Macedon,</inline> Bendigo, and other vantage points in Victoria. I ask the Minister: Have any decisions been made in this regard that would lend credence to such statements? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DAVIDSON, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr DAVIDSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member refers to certain statements with which I have dealt several times in this House, and, by way of explanation, to other inquiries within recent months. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TURNBULL, Winton</name>
<name role="display">Mr Turnbull</name>
</talker>
<para>- I heard the statements only yesterday. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DAVIDSON, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr DAVIDSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- The position is that, as I informed the House previously, this matter is being considered by the Government but no decision has yet been reached. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>RIFLE CLUBS</title>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KDA</name.id>
<electorate>WILMOT, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DUTHIE, Gilbert</name>
<name role="display">Mr DUTHIE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for the Army: Has the Government definitely decided to continue the subsidy to Australian rifle clubs on the same basis as in past years? Further, will the introduction of the FN rifle have any influence on the future planning of the Australian Rifle Clubs Association? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7J</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CRAMER, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr CRAMER</name>
</talker>
<para>- There is no present intention to deal with the question of subsidy but, of course, there will be matters for consideration as a result of the FN rifle being issued to the Citizen Military Forces, particularly in relation to the manufacture of ammunition. I think that was well understood. As soon as I am able to give the honorable member any definite information about this matter, which I am currently considering, I will let him know. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TAXATION IN PAPUA AND NEW GUINEA</title>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JTP</name.id>
<electorate>WENTWORTH, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BURY, Leslie</name>
<name role="display">Mr BURY</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question to the Minister for Territories is supplementary to that asked by the honorable member for Phillip. In view of the very far-reaching fiscal effects on our territories of the measures which are now in contemplation, will this House, having a responsibility in this matter, have any opportunity of debating this aspect, before the measures become territory law? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>ZL6</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HASLUCK, Paul</name>
<name role="display">Mr HASLUCK</name>
</talker>
<para>- So far as anything is in contemplation at the present moment, it is not proposed to put proposals before this House. The constitutional method of introducing such proposals is legislation in the Legislative Council for the Territory. Of course, the forms of the House do provide other opportunities for discussing the subject besides the consideration of legislation, and that is a matter for the House itself. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ARMAMENTS</title>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KYC</name.id>
<electorate>LALOR, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">POLLARD, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Mr POLLARD</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for the Army whether, in view of the development of nuclear warheads and atomic missiles generally, including intercontinental ballistic missiles, the FN .30 rifle and other so-called conventional weapons are worth the money Australia is expending on them. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7J</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CRAMER, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr CRAMER</name>
</talker>
<para>- Without going too deeply into this matter, I think it is a wrong conception that, as a result of the development of nuclear weapons, there is no place in defence for conventional weapons. Indeed, in my opinion, there will always be a place for conventional weapons, as I believe also there will always be a place in defence for ground troops. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TAXATION</title>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KBH</name.id>
<electorate>STURT, SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WILSON, Keith Cameron</name>
<name role="display">Mr WILSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct a question without notice to the Treasurer, which I preface by pointing out that under the present income tax and social services legislation only 5 per cent, of retiring allowances is taxable income. In a recent Taxation Board of Review case it was held that, on reemployment in the education department, school teachers are not entitled to that tax concession. Will the Treasurer investigate the matter and see whether something can be done to remedy what appears to be an injustice? I suggest that, surely, the reaching of retirement age gives the right to the benefit, and not the nature of subsequent employment. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MC</name.id>
<electorate>HIGGINS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Treasurer</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOLT, Harold</name>
<name role="display">Mr HAROLD HOLT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall be pleased to examine the matter brought forward by the honorable gentleman. I am not familiar with the circumstances, but now that he has raised the issue I shall have it fully examined. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA</title>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>BV8</name.id>
<electorate>MELBOURNE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CALWELL, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr CALWELL</name>
</talker>
<para>- 1 wish to ask the Minister for External Affairs a question without notice. Precisely what did the right honorable gentleman mean when he said two days ago that when diplomatic relations between Australia and the Soviet are fully restored the Russian mission in Canberra will not be frightfully large? Will he say what would be the size of the mission if it were frightfully small? Finally, was " frightfully " the proper word to use in the context of his statement, or did he intend to use the word " frighteningly "? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>