/
19651208_reps_25_hor49.xml
4415 lines (4415 loc) · 444 KB
/
19651208_reps_25_hor49.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1965-12-08</date>
<parliament.no>25</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>4</period.no>
<chamber>REPS</chamber>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<business.start>
<day.start>1965-12-08</day.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. Sir John McLeay)</inline>took the chair at 2.30 p.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>PENSIONS</title>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Petition</title>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. LINDSAY</inline>presented a petition from certain electors of the Commonwealth praying that the Parliament will amend the social services legislation to give an immediate increase in the basic pension rate paid to all social service pensioners. </para>
<para>Petition received. </para>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BOOKLET ON VIETNAM</title>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K97</name.id>
<electorate>KINGSTON, SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GALVIN, Patrick</name>
<name role="display">Mr GALVIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Prime Minister a question. Is he aware that the South Australian Minister for Education has stated that he has requested school teachers in South Australia not to use the booklet on Vietnam issued by the Department of External Affairs until he has had time to examine it? Will the Prime Minister give an assurance that no more of these booklets will go to South Australia until the wishes of the South Australian Minister for Education are known? Further, before sending these booklets to other States will the Prime Minister consult with State Ministers for Education? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>N76</name.id>
<electorate>KOOYONG, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Prime Minister</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MENZIES, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Sir ROBERT MENZIES</name>
</talker>
<para>- There is no obligation on any teacher to use this booklet or to discuss it with his pupils. The booklet is designed to inform headmasters of schools, clergymen and various social and other leaders in the community. I would be surprised to know that we cannot distribute a piece of literature relating to a matter within our jurisdiction without the consent of a State Minister. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6V</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COURTNAY, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr Courtnay</name>
</talker>
<para>- Send them the Vernon report. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>N76</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MENZIES, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Sir ROBERT MENZIES</name>
</talker>
<para>- That is not a bad idea. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SHIPPING</title>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KGP</name.id>
<electorate>ISAACS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HAWORTH, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr HAWORTH</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for Labour and National Service a question concerning the hold up of the tanker "Oceanic Grandeur" by members of the Australian Seamen's Union. It has been alleged that the hold up is due to a broken implied agreement between Ampol Petroleum Ltd. and the Seamen's Union to man the " P. J. Adams " with an Australian crew after the company had been granted a subsidy of £1 million by the Australian Government. Is this claim correct? If not, what is the reason for this precipitate action by the Australian Seamen's Union? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MA</name.id>
<electorate>LOWE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Labour and National Service</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCMAHON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr McMAHON</name>
</talker>
<para>- The " Oceanic Grandeur " has been held up in Moreton Bay by the tugboat employees' organisation. I am not certain whether members of that organisation are members of the Australian Seamen's Union. The alleged ground for the hold up is that a verbal agreement between the Ampol company and the tugboat employees has not been observed. In order to prevent this hold up continuing we have been in close consultation with our colleagues in Queensland. I have ascertained that the tugboat employees' organisation is not here operating under the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act but comes within the jurisdiction of the Queensland Industrial Commission. The Queensland authorities have informed my Department today that the matter will immediately come before <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Commissioner</inline> Harvey. It is hoped that very shortly he will bc able to call the parties together with a view to resolving the dispute quickly. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>IMMIGRATION</title>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQY</name.id>
<electorate>ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SEXTON, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Mr SEXTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is directed to the Minister for Immigration. Can he tell the House why 4,000 migrants - a record number - left Australia during the September quarter? Can he say what the action of these unsatisfied migrants will cost Australia? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3735</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMB</name.id>
<electorate>CORIO, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Immigration</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">OPPERMAN, Hubert</name>
<name role="display">Mr OPPERMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member's question covers a very wide subject. Actually, migrants are reaching Australia in record numbers. More migrants are coming here now than have ever come before and naturally the number of those leaving Australia will be higher than it was before. However, the proportion of those returning overseas, related to the total number arriving in Australia, remains much the same. Economic conditions overseas are now much better than they were in the days gone by and migrants who believe that they will be able to get employment that they were denied before are attracted to return to their homelands. This emphasises the point that I made when I returned from my recent trip. I said then that we will have increasing difficulty in attracting migrants to Australia because conditions overseas are improving. However, that does not alter the fact that good advertising overseas and the efforts of our dedicated representatives, who are responsible for implementing our migration scheme, have resulted in Australia receiving a record number of migrants. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>Many of the migrants who leave Australia do not do so because they are dissatisfied. Domestic affairs cause some migrants to return to their homelands. In addition, Australia is a country with a high level of wages and migrants can save their fares to go back to the countries of their birth. This means that we in Australia should use our best efforts to satisfy the needs of migrants. But no country in the world has a better understanding of these needs than Australia has and no country gives migrants the welcome that Australia gives. We have Good Neighbour Councils, Bring Out a Briton associations and churches all working to improve the lot of the migrants here. Although the honorable member may feel that the number of migrants leaving Australia is large, Australia has the lowest rate of return of any immigration country. One country that is competing with us has a rate of return of 30 per cent.; our rate is 10 per cent, or so. In addition, 60 per cent, of migrants who return to their homelands want to come back to Australia. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3736</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>BV8</name.id>
<electorate>MELBOURNE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CALWELL, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr CALWELL</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for Immigration a supplementary question. Admitting the truth of all that he has said about the success of our immigration policy in attracting and holding migrants, will the Minister investigate the possibility of retaining some of those who want to go back and of attracting more by asking his colleagues to provide houses in advance for migrants who wish to come here, after the Government has provided houses for Australians who wish to marry and for those who cannot obtain houses today? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3736</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">OPPERMAN, Hubert</name>
<name role="display">Mr OPPERMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member raises a matter of policy that is not directly related to immigration. However, I point out that we have hostels for migrants who come here. Similar hostels are not provided in other countries. Many migrants in hostels are quite happy to be there. The Government has a scheme of hostel subsidies which allows migrants to save for the purpose of buying a house. We have always stressed the need to have sponsored migration to Australia. In this scheme, the sponsor would have accommodation ready for the migrant. I repeat what I said recently in answer to a question. The Liberal Government that was in office in South Australia for a long time developed an excellent housing scheme and that State provided more personal nominations for migrants than did any other State. I add that the length of the stay in migrant hostels has fallen from the original average of two years to an average now of eight months. This would suggest that there has been an improvement in housing. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>HOUSING FINANCE</title>
<page.no>3736</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<para class="block">
<inline font-weight="bold">Sir JOHN</inline>CRAMER__ My question is directed to the Treasurer. In recent announcements of additional finance being made available for housing, emphasis was' given to loans for new housing to stimulate the building industry. No mention was made of the need for finance for the purchase of existing and older homes. Is the Treasurer aware that the maximum stimulus is given to the building industry if finance is made available without discrimination between new or old homes, or between existing homes or homes to be built? Will he see to it that this economic fact is fully understood by Treasury officials and those dealing with housing finance? </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3736</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MC</name.id>
<electorate>HIGGINS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Treasurer</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOLT, Harold</name>
<name role="display">Mr HAROLD HOLT</name>
</talker>
<para>- Like others in the House I respect the particular knowledge which the honorable gentleman has of the housing industry. He speaks with some authority on these matters, lt is true that in the announcement made recently the Governor of the Reserve Bank said that in approaching savings banks and proposing to them that they increase their current high level of lending for housing purposes he had suggested that the increased lending should preferably be for new rather than used houses. I think the objective was to give some quick stimulus to new building in view of a situation in which there had been some decline from the level of construction in an earlier period of the year. As the honorable gentleman points out, it may be that we could well achieve a somewhat similar result if finance went to a person who sells a house and with the proceeds of that sale sets about building a new home. But usually there is involved in this a lag sufficiently long for the bank to have taken the view that in present circumstances the quick response looked for could be got more realistically by lending for new housing purposes. However, <inline font-weight="bold">Sir, I</inline> respect the views the honorable member has on this matter and I will be glad to pursue his suggestions further with those who are very much more knowledgable on the matter than I am. In particular I will refer to my colleague, the Minister for Housing, the remarks the honorable gentleman has put to me. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NATIONAL SERVICE TRAINING</title>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KKB</name.id>
<electorate>LA TROBE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JESS, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr JESS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Minister for Labour and National Service seen reports in some quarters that national service training is having an effect on recruitment for the Citizen Military Forces? Could the Minister reiterate the existing conditions, and any variations to policy, whereby men may serve in the Citizen Military Forces instead of being required to render national service? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCMAHON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr McMAHON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have seen reports over the last three to four months that young men who might otherwise be called up for national service training were applying for membership of the Citizen Military Forces and being accepted. When they found that their birthdays were not drawn in the ballot they then resigned from the Citizen Military Forces and were not subsequently called up for national service training. This matter has received careful attention by my colleagues, the Ministers for Defence, Army, Navy and Air and also by the Department of Labour and National Service. I hope, with the approval of the Leader of the Opposition, to make a short statement on the matter immediately after question time. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CIVIL AVIATION</title>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCB</name.id>
<electorate>BRADDON, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DAVIES, Ronald</name>
<name role="display">Mr DAVIES</name>
</talker>
<para>- I preface a question to the Minister representing the Minister for Civil Aviation by reminding the Minister that the Duck River Co-operative Butter Factory Co. Ltd. at Smithton, Tasmania, is at present using three to four TransAustralia Airlines DC3's per week to airlift some 24,000 to 30,000 lb. of meat to Melbourne from the Smithton aerodrome, and that a serious problem has arisen in that we have to accept the decision of the traffic controller at the Wynyard aerodrome before permission can be given for aircraft to land at Smithton. I ask the Minister: Is he aware that the weather patterns at Wynyard and Smithton can be the very opposite of one another because of the effect of the Sisters Hills between Wynyard and Smithton? In view of the double handling, the loss of bloom on the meat and increased costs, &c, involved when meat has to be taken back to the factory from the Smithton aerodrome because Wynyard has refused landing permission, will the Minister give immediate and urgent consideration to either appointing a departmental officer at Smithton or authorizing the local agent of T.A.A., who handles these aircraft, to advise regarding weather conditions at Smithton during this very busy meat export season? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KDT</name.id>
<electorate>FARRER, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for National Development</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FAIRBAIRN, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr FAIRBAIRN</name>
</talker>
<para>- <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker,</inline> naturally I am not aware of the facts that the honorable gentleman has given me in his question. I will see that these facts are passed on to the Minister for Civil Aviation in another place and that the request made by the honorable member is looked at. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MARKETING OF DRIED FRUITS</title>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWP</name.id>
<electorate>MALLEE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TURNBULL, Winton</name>
<name role="display">Mr TURNBULL</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the AttorneyGeneral whether the present system of marketing Australian dried fruits at home and abroad is definitely exempt from the provisions of the Trade Practices Bill 1965, which was passed by this House earlier today. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3737</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>DQF</name.id>
<electorate>BRUCE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Attorney-General</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SNEDDEN, Billy</name>
<name role="display">Mr SNEDDEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The system is not definitely exempted but provision is made in the Bill as it left this House for it to be exempted. The Government has had in mind that there are primary industry marketing organisations which should be so exempted. There is power in the Bill in this regard. As a matter of policy the Government has looked at, for instance, the Australian Dried Fruits Association and the way it markets its products as a primary industry marketing organisation. I am confident that it would be exempted under the terms of the regulations concerning the Bill. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>COAL</title>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0O</name.id>
<electorate>CUNNINGHAM, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CONNOR, Rex</name>
<name role="display">Mr CONNOR</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister for National Development, at his coming conference with the New South Wales Minister for Mines, discuss with that gentleman his statement of last May expressing concern at the possible exhaustion through present rates of consumption of New South Wales hard coking coal reserves by the year 2000? Will he also discuss with the New South Wales Minister for Mines the need for examining some controls over expanded exports of such coal? In addition, will he ask the Minister for Mines that additional reserves of such coal in New South Wales, when located and proven, be preserved for the steel industry and other Australian consumers? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KDT</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FAIRBAIRN, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr FAIRBAIRN</name>
</talker>
<para>- It was because the Commonwealth Government did show some concern at the rate of depletion of coking coal supplies in New South Wales and Queensland that we got in touch with the Governments of those two States and arranged to hold the conference to which the honorable member referred. All we are seeking to do is to assess what these reserves are. We know that at the present moment they are very considerable. Speaking from memory, I think the known coal reserves in New South Wales are about 1,000 million tons. We believe that less than half this quantity will be required by Australia to the end of this century. Nevertheless we are anxious that a proper assessment of all the resources in New South Wales and Queensland should be made so that, after this assessment has been made, the Government may be in a position to know the correct policy it should undertake. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>QUESTIONS UPON NOTICE</title>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEE</name.id>
<electorate>CHISHOLM, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KENT HUGHES, Wilfrid</name>
<name role="display">Sir Wilfrid Kent Hughes</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Prime Minister whether he is in a position yet to reply to two previous questions I asked regarding the Australian troops in Vietnam and about which the right honorable gentleman said he hoped to have the information last month. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>N76</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MENZIES, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Sir ROBERT MENZIES</name>
</talker>
<para>- I know that the honorable member has raised this matter quite a few times with me. As he knows, this matter involves discussions in London. I am happy so say that in the case of the Borneo clasp for the General Service Medal 1962- </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>6U4</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WHITLAM, Gough</name>
<name role="display">Mr Whitlam</name>
</talker>
<para>- I rise to order, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker.</inline> I regret to have to take the same point of order as I took yesterday. There are questions on the notice paper to the right honorable gentleman concerning these matters. They have been there since 9th November. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER</name>
</talker>
<para>- If there are questions on the notice paper in relation to this matter the honorable member's question is out of order. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEE</name.id>
<electorate>CHISHOLM, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KENT HUGHES, Wilfrid</name>
<name role="display">Sir Wilfrid Kent Hughes</name>
</talker>
<para>- <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker,</inline> I, too, rise to order. I asked my questions long before the Deputy Leader of the Opposition put his questions on the notice paper. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Prime Minister satisfied to answer the question? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>N76</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MENZIES, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Sir ROBERT MENZIES</name>
</talker>
<para>- <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker,</inline> I am always satisfied to give a little information. The information is that Her Majesty has been pleased to approve the award of the General Service Medal 1962 with the clasp " Borneo " to Australian servicemen in the area who qualify for the award. The other case is that of Vietnam, and on this no finality has yet been reached. It is being very actively pursued. I have had messages about it in the last 24 hours. I hope to be able to make an announcement at an early date. When I have the information, I will make the announcement promptly. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SOCIAL SERVICES</title>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3738</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JUX</name.id>
<electorate>WEST SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MINOGUE, Daniel</name>
<name role="display">Mr MINOGUE</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is addressed to the Minister for Social Services. Now that the Minister for Health has given a lead in removing the disparity between pensioners with respect to the medical entitlement card, will the Minister for Social Services follow his example by granting the same rates of pension and supplementary assistance to married and single pensioners? Will he also remove the anomaly represented by the payment of the additional funeral benefit to certain relatives of deceased pensioners and not to other relatives who have the same responsibility to see that deceased pensioners receive decent burials, which now cost at least £100? Why is it that the Government persists in treating pensioners on the basis of " some chalk, some cheese "? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>5E4</name.id>
<electorate>NEW ENGLAND, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role>Minister for Social Services</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SINCLAIR, Ian</name>
<name role="display">Mr SINCLAIR</name>
</talker>
<para>- The extension of the pensioner medical service to all persons receiving pensions is another instance of the way in which this Government has extended social service benefits progressively to all sections of the community. The second part of the honorable member's question related to supplementary assistance. The increase of supplementary assistance announced by the Treasurer in his Budget speech was for the purpose of extending additional assistance to single pensioners paying rent, who would seem to be the ones most affected by the cost situation in the community. It is felt that in the present situation single pensioners have a greater need than married pensioners. The distinction between single and married pensioners has been explained on a number of occasions in this House during discussions on suggestions for a standard rate of pension. The practice of paying different amounts to single and married pensioners is customarily followed in every country of the western world, on the basis that married people are able to share between them certain household expenses. The honorable member also referred to the extension of the funeral benefit. It is felt that pensioners should get the additional advantage of the extended funeral benefit, and it is to this category of person that the funeral benefit has recently been extended. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>WOOL RESERVE PRICES PLAN</title>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KLJ</name.id>
<electorate>MOORE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MAISEY, Donald</name>
<name role="display">Mr MAISEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct a question to the Acting Minister for Primary Industry. Because of the widespread interest in the wool reserve prices scheme referendum, voting in which will close tomorrow, can the Minister say when the results of the ballot are likely to be known? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>BU4</name.id>
<electorate>RICHMOND, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role>Minister for the Interior</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ANTHONY, Doug</name>
<name role="display">Mr ANTHONY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The ballot will close at 12 noon tomorrow. The counting will start tomorrow afternoon. It is expected that the tallies in the various States will be completed by tomorrow night. They will be forwarded to the Chief Commonwealth Electoral Officer in Canberra, who will add up the results from the various States. It is hoped that he will be able to give the results to the Minister on Friday and that the Minister will be able to announce them by about noon on Friday. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DROUGHT RELIEF</title>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JVU</name.id>
<electorate>NORTHERN TERRITORY, NORTHERN TERRITORY</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NELSON, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr NELSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is addressed to the Prime Minister. I refer to the agreement between the Commonwealth Government and the Governments of New South Wales and Queensland on drought relief, as announced in the House yesterday. Will the Prime Minister extend to drought affected primary producers in the Northern Territory the same kind and level of assistance as the States are extending to their primary producers? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>N76</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MENZIES, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Sir ROBERT MENZIES</name>
</talker>
<para>- This is a matter which falls properly within the jurisdiction of the Minister for Territories. It was dealt with originally, as the honorable member will recall, as a separate matter, with special arrangements being made because we had a broad and direct responsibility in the Northern Territory. Should there be any further developments in this matter I am perfectly certain that the Minister for Territories will be most willing to inform the House about them at the right time. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>REDSTONE ROCKETS</title>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JSE</name.id>
<electorate>ROBERTSON, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRIDGES-MAXWELL, Crawford</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRIDGES-MAXWELL</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Minister for Supply a question. I refer to a report that Redstone rockets from the United States of America are to be used for space experiments at Woomera. Is this correct? Are these superseded rockets unsafe, as the reports suggest, or are they suitable for the types of experiments to be carried out? Can the Minister tell the House anything about the experiments in which these rockets are to be used? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3739</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEN</name.id>
<electorate>PATERSON, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Supply</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FAIRHALL, Allen</name>
<name role="display">Mr FAIRHALL</name>
</talker>
<para>- For some time the Department of Supply has been carrying on under a joint agreement with the United Kingdom experiments in what are known as re-entry physics to judge the technical phenomena that occur when a space vehicle re-enters the earth's atmosphere. These experiments have been conducted with the Black Knight rocket. They have now reached a point at which it would perhaps be desirable to have a more powerful rocket that would give greater height and therefore greater speed of re-entry. For some time there have been in progress negotiations for a tripartite arrangement between the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States of America. An agreement has not yet been finalised, but if it should be it would provide for the use of the Redstone rocket, which would be supplied by the United States. It is true that the Redstone rocket is obsolete for orbital flight, for which it was once used, and as an intercontinental ballistic missile, for which use it was designed. But in terms of the kind of experiment that we wish to undertake at Woomera it is not obsolete. There will be no safety problem since the rocket is not to be used for horizontal flight but will be used only for vertical flight for which, apart from any other considerations, it is completely safe. Furthermore, the safety precautions at the Woomera rocket range are very strict indeed. The honorable member may rest assured that if the projected agreement is arranged the programme will be carried through with safety and I am sure that it will be completed with satisfaction. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3740</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>VIETNAM</title>
<page.no>3740</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3740</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>EE4</name.id>
<electorate>REID, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">UREN, Tom</name>
<name role="display">Mr UREN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct my question to the Minister for the Army. I ask: Has he inquired into the accusations made by the head of the Saigon bureau of the United States magazine " Newsweek " that an Australian adviser serving with the South Vietnamese forces had advised a Vietnamese officer to shoot a Vietcong suspect? If the Minister has made an inquiry will he say whether the facts are as published in " Newsweek " and will he give to the House details of the inquiry? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3740</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFH</name.id>
<electorate>BARKER, SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister Assisting the Treasurer</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORBES, Alexander</name>
<name role="display">Dr FORBES</name>
</talker>
<para>- As I said at the time that the article appeared, I am in the course of investigating this matter. The delay in the inquiry has been due to the fact that the article does not identify the time and place and does not name the individual concerned. Secondly, delay has been caused because the author of the article, whose name is Tuohy, has been absent from Saigon. However, on 4th December he attended a meeting with the commander of the Australian Army forces in Vietnam at the commander's request. At that meeting the commander asked the correspondent some questions about the article. He asked first whether it gave a first-hand account and whether the correspondent had seen the incident. To this question he replied: " No ". He was asked whether he believed the report to be true. He said: " Yes ". He admitted, however, that the story might have become somewhat blurred as a consequence of passing through quite a number of hands and admitted that it probably went through quite a number of hands. He was told by the commander that this was a matter of great moment to us in Australia, that it represented a slur on the good name of Australian soldiers, that such behaviour as that alleged was contrary to everything that they had been taught in their training and everything that they had been brought up to believe in as soldiers and that the correspondent therefore had an obligation to name the soldier concerned. The correspondent was told that this was a matter much bigger than just the possible conseqeunces for one individual. So far he has refused to name the soldier, but is considering his position. Until this is done I can take the matter no further. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3740</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MINING</title>
<page.no>3740</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3740</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KAR</name.id>
<electorate>BOWMAN, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GIBBS, Wylie</name>
<name role="display">Dr GIBBS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Minister for National Development seen a report that a new silver-lead-zinc lode in the Northern Territory is to be worked by an Australian company? Is this report true? Will the honorable gentleman tell the House how many mineral discoveries have been brought into production or earmarked for production in the last 12 months? Are new mineral discoveries likely to make a significant contribution to export income in the foreseeable future? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3740</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KDT</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FAIRBAIRN, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr FAIRBAIRN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The silver-lead-zinc mine to which I think the honorable gentleman refers, and which is to be mined by United Uranium, is not a new mine; it is one which was originally mined about 20 years ago and the high quality ore was taken out. It has now been drilled and deposits have proved to be fairly extensive. I understand that some of the lower quality ore is about to be mined. However, this is not one of the very large discoveries. I am afraid, as the honorable gentleman realises, that it is quite impossible for me to detail, in answer to a question without notice, all the discoveries that have occurred in Australia during the last 12 months, because we are going through a second period of discovery which probably exceeds the discoveries of the gold rush. If the honorable gentleman puts the question on the notice paper I will see that he gets a full reply. 1 can tell him, however, that minerals look like playing a very important part in contributing to Australia's export income. This year, £120 million worth of minerals were exported, and the Bureau of Mineral Resources has estimated that in five years' time the value of our exports of minerals will have risen to £280 million per annum. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SCHOOL CADETS</title>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUX</name.id>
<electorate>LANG, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">STEWART, Francis</name>
<name role="display">Mr STEWART</name>
</talker>
<para>- I address a question to the Minister for the Army. Is it a fact that school cadet units are expected to attend week-end bivouacs and two-week camps during summer months? Is it also a fact that the issue of summer trousers to school cadets has been reduced from two pairs to one pair? If so, what are the reasons for this pinch penny decision and who is responsible for it? Do Army authorities expect school cadets to wear the one pair of trousers for the duration of the bivouacs and camps? If not, what arrangements is a school cadet expected to make to protect his modesty while his sole pair of trousers is being laundered? Finally, is there any truth in the rumour that a member of the Pacific Islands Regiment is to be asked to demonstrate to school cadets the correct way to don their privately supplied lap-laps? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORBES, Alexander</name>
<name role="display">Dr FORBES</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am not aware of the position described by the honorable gentleman. 1 shall investigate and find out what the situation is. Perhaps I should say at this stage that school cadets, like members of the Services going into camp, would doubtless be issued with working dress while in camp as part of a camp issue. This would undoubtedly reduce the strain, even on the one pair of trousers, if that is all that they have. However, I shall investigate the position and let the honorable gentleman know the result of my inquiries. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DROUGHT RELIEF</title>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JLT</name.id>
<electorate>GWYDIR, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ALLAN, Archibald</name>
<name role="display">Mr IAN ALLAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Can the Treasurer give an assurance that the needs of those primary producers in drought affected areas who have not exhausted their capital or capacity to borrow and who will thus be excluded from the benefits announced by the Prime Minister yesterday will be considered by the Government? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOLT, Harold</name>
<name role="display">Mr HAROLD HOLT</name>
</talker>
<para>- Representations on this aspect have come from honorable members in various parts of the House, including the honorable gentleman himself on earlier occasions. I can assure him that the situation of those who fall within this category is well recognised by the Government and consideration is being given to ways and means by which they can be assisted with their problem. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL BENEFITS</title>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>BV8</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CALWELL, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr CALWELL</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for Social Services: Is it a fact that the means test with regard to pharmaceutical and medical benefits as applied to pensioners was imposed by the present Government on 1st November 1955? Is it also a fact that during the 10-year period that has elapsed since then the Opposition has repeatedly moved amendments seeking the abolition of the means test, without having once received any support from any one Government member? Is it also a fact that not one Government member has ever spoken in protest against the operation of the means test on pensioners in the past 10 years? </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3741</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KIW</name.id>
<electorate />