/
19131127_senate_5_72.xml
6717 lines (6717 loc) · 357 KB
/
19131127_senate_5_72.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1913-11-27</date>
<parliament.no>5</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>0</period.no>
<chamber>SENATE</chamber>
<page.no>3496</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">Senate. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1913-11-27</day.start>
<para>The President took the chair at : 3 p.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>PRIVILEGE</title>
<page.no>3496</page.no>
<type>privilege</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>The President's Vote: Newspaper Statement</title>
<page.no>3496</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3496</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate>Western Australia'</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator PEARCE</name>
</talker>
<para>. - On a question of privilege, sir, I desire to bring under your notice the following paragraph which appeared in the <inline font-style="italic">Daily Telegraph</inline> of Sydney, on Tuesday, the 25th November, 1913: - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para class="block">TWO VOTES. </para>
<para class="block">Speaker's and President's. </para>
<para class="block">
<inline font-style="italic">Circumstances Alter Cases.</inline>(From our Special Representative.) </para>
<para>Melbourne, Monday. - As the Federal members are bitterly assailing <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. W.</inline> E. Johnson, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, for voting in Committee with his party, and for having given his casting vote with his party in one or two divisions in the House, itis appropriate to know how <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Givens,</inline> the President of the Senate, acts when party questions come up in the Senate. The President and the Chairman take part in all divisions. Both are Labour members, and both always vote with the Labour party. In the various divisions giving effect to the strike mandate of the Caucus, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Givens,</inline> though the President, voted in favour of the strike. As the question was strictlya party one, it was natural that he should. </para>
<para>But what is to be thought of the meanness of the Labour members who are declaiming about the country against <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Johnson</inline> for doing no more than <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Givens</inline> does? <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Johnson</inline> is . a Liberal, and it is ludicrous to suppose that be would vote in Committee - where he is not Speaker, but only a private member - with the party which he was elected to oppose. It 'is quite as absurd to suppose that when he is called upon to give a casting vote, which, after all, is really as much a personal vote as <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Givens',</inline> be should declare for his opponents. If the Labour denunciations are good for <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Johnson,</inline> they are good for <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Givens,</inline> but they are not directed at <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Givens.</inline> They are reserved for <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Johnson.</inline></para>
</quote>
<para class="block">I wish to. know, sir, whether the statement that " in the various divisions giving effect to the strike mandate of the Caucus, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Givens,</inline> though the President, voted in favour of the strike " is correct. I also want to know, sir, whether it is a fact that the President and the Chairman of Committees in the Senate take part in all divisions ? </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3497</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUL</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MILLEN, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator Millen</name>
</talker>
<para>- That is not a matter of privilege. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3497</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRESIDENT, The</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT</name>
</talker>
<para>- Strictly speaking this is not a matter of privilege, because after raising a question of privilege the honorable senator would have to conclude with a motion. Personally, I do not desire that any motion of that kind should be submitted. The paragraph in question was brought under my notice yesterday by telegrams which I received from various parts of New South Wales, asking me whether it was true. I looked up the paragraph, and from the fact that telegrams had reached me from various parts of New South Wales, I naturally came to the conclusion that the statements it contained were being used for political purposes in that State. I think it is a matter for regret that a person occupying the position I do should be dragged into a discussion of that kind for purely political purposes. I take a very serious view of the paragraph, because it affects my honour as the President of the Senate. It accuses me of doing something which, under some circumstances, it might not be right for the presiding officer to do; but in any case there is not a single word of truth in the paragraph. It is recklessly inaccurate, because the writer could, with the slightest trouble, if he was not aware of the facts, have ascertained them from the officers of the Senate. As every honorable senator knows, and as the records of the Senate show, in all the proceedings in the Chamber last week, I never once voted for a suspension of the Standing Orders, or for the adjournment of the Senate. I think it is a matter for very serious regret that a great newspaper like the Sydney <inline font-style="italic">Daily Telegraph</inline> should make a grossly misleading statement of that kind. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3497</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXJ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NEEDHAM, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator Needham</name>
</talker>
<para>- Bring the editor to the bar. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3497</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KNB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GUTHRIE, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Senator Guthrie</name>
</talker>
<para>- Let the Minister act upon it. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3497</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRESIDENT, The</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT</name>
</talker>
<para>- The newspapers have reached a position of great affluence, and I might say, also, of great eminence, in the public estimation as the purveyors of information, and the least that might be expected of them in return for the position which they have attained by the favour of the public is that the information they sell, and on which they build up their eminence and their fortune, especially with regard to such an important institution asParliament, should be at least accurate, and not fraudulent. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3497</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NO-CONFIDENCE MOTION: PRACTICE</title>
<page.no>3497</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3497</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'LOGHLIN, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator Lt Colonel O'LOGHLIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the last day of sitting, sir, I asked you certain question with regard to the procedure of the Senate while a noconfidence motion was pending, and, at your suggestion, I gave notice of them for the next day of sitting. I find that they do not appear on the notice-paper for to-day, and I should like to know the reason why? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3497</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRESIDENT, The</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT</name>
</talker>
<para>- The questions do not appear on the notice-paper, because that would be contrary to parliamentary practice. Honorable senators must be aware that, where our own Standing Orders are silent, or do not give a specific direction, we are guided by the practice of the House of Commons. On page 247 of the 11th edition of <inline font-weight="bold">Sir Erskine</inline> May's text-book on <inline font-style="italic">Parliamentary Practice,</inline> which is usually taken as our guide, this passage appears - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>As regards questions addressed to the Speaker, no written or public notice of such a question is permissible ; nor can any appeal be made to the Chair by a question, save on points of order as they arise, or on a matter which urgently concerns the proceedings of the House. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">As <inline font-weight="bold">Senator O'Loghlin's</inline> questions do concern the proceedings of the Senate, I have prepared answers to them. The questions of which I have a note are as follow: - </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>What has been the practice of the Senate hitherto when a motion of want of confidence in the Government has been pending in another branch of the Legislature? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Is there any precedent for the Senate proceeding with Government business while a censure motion remains undetermined? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>What has been the practice generally of Second Chambers throughout the British Dominions under such circumstances? </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">The answers to the questions are as follow : - </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>The following record shows the. practice of the Senate while motions of censure are under discussion in the other House : - </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">
<graphic href="072332191311273_2_0.jpg" />
</para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="2.">
<para>The Senatehas, more than once, met to pass a Supply Bill whilst a censure motion was pending ; and in connexion with the case in 1909, which shows that the Senate met on several occasions, it appears that the Ministerial policy was under discussion in this Chamber, and the Vice-President of the Executive Council <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Millen)</inline> asked the Senate to continue to sit to deal with that business, for reasons which he then stated. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>A search in Parliamentary books of reference does not disclose the action of second chambers generally in such cases ; but Bourinot, in his <inline font-style="italic">Parliamentary Procedure and Practice,</inline> refers to the manner of dealing with motions of want of confidence in the Lower Houses in Canada and Great Britain (see pages 379-381). </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>PAPERS</title>
<page.no>3498</page.no>
<type>papers</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>MINISTERS laid upon the table the following papers: - </para>
<quote>
<para>Defence Act 1903-1912. - Regulations amended, &c.- </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">Statutory Rules 1913, No. 292. </para>
<para class="block">Statutory Rules 1913, No. 293. </para>
<para class="block">Statutory Rules1913, No. 294. </para>
<para class="block">Kalgoorlie to Port Augusta Railway Act 1911- 1912 - </para>
<para class="block">Schedule 1. - Rate for Wool from Euro Bluff to Port Augusta </para>
<para class="block">Lands Acquisition Act 1906. - Land acquired under, at - </para>
<para>Burnie, Tasmania - For Defence purposes. </para>
<para>Drouin, Victoria - For Defence purposes. </para>
<para>Hammond Island, Queensland - For Quarantine purposes. </para>
<para>Kalgoorlie, Western Australia - For Defence purposes. </para>
<para>Lithgow, New South Wales - For Defence purposes. </para>
<para>Pialligo, Canberra, and Goorooyarroo, Federal Territory, and New South Wales - For Federal Capital purposes. </para>
<para>Tailem Bend, South Australia - For Postal purposes. </para>
<para>Telegraphs and Telephones Special Works Account Act 1911 - Transfers, dated 12th November, 1 913. </para>
<para>Public Service Act 1902-1911. - Appointments and promotion - </para>
<para>Department of Home Affairs. - E. D. Gilchrist, to new position of Draughtsman, Class F, Lands and Survey Branch. </para>
<para>Department of the Treasury. - H. C. Burnet, to new position of Valuer, Class D, Land Tax Branch, South Australia. </para>
<para>Postmaster-General's Department. - R. A. Shortland, as Supervisor, 3rd Class, Mail Branch, New South Wales. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3498</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>COUNTRY MAILS</title>
<page.no>3498</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3498</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K3Q</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BUZACOTT, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Senator BUZACOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister representing the PostmasterGeneral, without notice, whether he will make a statement as to the policy of the Government regarding mail facilities for residents in out-back centres, and especially in respect to the following instance. Five or six thousand electors, with their families, in the north-east goldfields of Western Australia, have, for many years, had a daily mail service. I am informed that the Department now intends to reduce the service to one of three mails per week. Is such action in accordance with the policy of the Government? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3498</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister (without portfolio)</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CLEMONS</name>
</talker>
<para>- <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Buzacott</inline> will understand that this matter is new to me; but with regard to his concluding sentence, may I say that, as the case is presented to me, such action is not in accordance with the policy of the present Government. Meanwhile, I will make inquiries with respect tothe particular case. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3498</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K3Q</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BUZACOTT, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Senator BUZACOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister obtain the information before the Supply Bill passes its final stages? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3498</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CLEMONS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I hesitate to give such an undertaking, as far as concerns the Supply Bill, which will be under consideration to-day; but I can assure the honorable senator that I will try to get the information while the Bill is before us. If I cannot do that, I will obtain it as soon as possible. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY,</title>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Mr. Swinburne's Report: King Island</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYX</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FINDLEY, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator FINDLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister representing the PostmasterGeneral whether <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Swinburne</inline> has completed his report on the Commonwealth wireless telegraphy system, and, if so, whether it is the intention of the Government to make the report public? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CLEMONS</name>
</talker>
<para>- The report to which <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Findley</inline> refers has a very close bearing upon certain law proceedings, and consequently it would be quite contrary to public policy to divulge it at the present moment. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYX</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FINDLEY, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator Findley</name>
</talker>
<para>- The report does not wholly refer to the law proceedings? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CLEMONS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am unable so to dismember the report as to enable us to put forth any portion of it now. The reasons I have given, and <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Findley</inline> must appreciate them. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KRX</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LONG, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator LONG</name>
</talker>
<para>- I should like to express regret that the Honorary Minister, acting for <inline font-weight="bold">Senator McColl,</inline> did not find it convenient to supply the Senate with some information in reply to a question I submitted some time ago, having reference to the isolated condition of the people of King Island and the possibility of securing for them early communication by wireless telegraphy. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator Clemons</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am sorry I have no reply to that question yet. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SUGAR EXCISE</title>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVH</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MULLAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator MULLAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- On behalf of <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Maughan,</inline> I desire to ask the Minister of Trade and Customs, without notice, a question in connexion with the large amount of sugar excise lost through the proclamation of the Sugar Excise Act. Is the Minister prepared to inform the Senate what proportion, if any, of that sum has been so far paid ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CLEMONS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I regret that I must differ from the statement of <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Mullan</inline> incorporated in his question. I cannot admit that any sum of money has been lost. With respect to the rest of the question, I will endeavour to obtain the information. </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="italic">
<inline font-style="italic">Later.</inline>
</para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CLEMONS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Various questions have recently been asked in the Senate, chiefly of <inline font-weight="bold">Senator McColl,</inline> to which replies have not, so far, been given. I wish to take advantage of this oppor tunity to give replies to those questions. One question asked referred to the matter dealt with in the question which <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Mullan</inline> asked without notice to-day on behalf of <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Maughan.</inline> The answer supplied to the question is as follows: - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>The Excise Tariff 1913 is to come into operation on a date to be proclaimed. Before" the Act can be proclaimed the Comptroller-General must publish a notice in the <inline font-style="italic">Gazette</inline> certifying the quantity of cane sugar and the quantity of beet sugar on which duty is payable under the Act. </para>
<para>Action is now being taken with a view to the proclamation of the Act, and the publication of the Comptroller-General's certificate at as early a date as possible. </para>
</quote>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>MILITARY LAND, UNLEY</title>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'LOGHLIN, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator Lt Colonel O'LOGHLIN</name>
</talker>
<para>.- I call the attention of the Minister of Defence to a statement made at the Unley Council, South Australia, on Monday, in regard to certain lands acquired in the municipality for military purposes. Alderman Cooke is reported in the Adelaide <inline font-style="italic"> Register</inline> to have said - </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<quote>
<para>The Department had paid no rates on its property, and deprived the council of a considerable sum. A system of drainage had been introduced from the head-quarters and parade ground which the council had condemned, and the recent heavy rains had had a result which showed how well founded the opposition was. </para>
</quote>
<para>The Adelaide <inline font-style="italic">Advertiser</inline> reports Alderman Cooke as having entered an emphatic protest against the action of the Home Affairs Department. He said - </para>
<quote>
<para>That Department had acquired for military purposes a considerable area of land within the city boundary, upon which the Federal Government paid no rates, and had thus deprived the council of considerable revenue. The Department had instituted a system of drainage which had been disapproved by the council, and despite the representations of the corporation officers had proceeded with the work. The recent rains had proved how inadequate was the drainage. The Department had diverted storm water into the street, which overtaxed the water tables and flooded the roadway, and still refused to do anything to assist the council to overcome the trouble. </para>
</quote>
<para>I wish to ask whether the Minister will take the matter into consideration, and see whether damage has been caused by the works of the Federal Government; and, if so. whether the Government will bear their proper part of the expense incurred ? </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3499</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUL</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MILLEN, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator MILLEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The matter referred to, although one with which the Defence Department is intimately concerned, is at this juncture more particularly under the control of the Home Affairs Department. If the honorable senator will hand to me the newspaper report,I will place it before the Minister of Home Affairs with a view of having the subject inquired into. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>POST OFFICE, ADELAIDE</title>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXV</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NEWLANDS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator NEWLANDS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister . representing the PostmasterGeneral whether his attention has been called to the fact that a very serious fire took place in Adelaide yesterday at timber mills adjoining the General Post Office ? The Superintendent of the Fire Brigade has made the following statement: - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>It was really thebrick wall standing between the two sections which saved the situation. If the eastern block had caught, then I think the fire would - well, I don't say it would have destroyed thepost-office, but I do say the heat was so intense that it would have upset and spoilt all the carefully and delicately balanced instruments in the Telegraph Department, and so on, and it would most probably have interfered with the working of the telephone exchange. </para>
</quote>
<para>Will the Minister take steps to safeguard the interests of the Commonwealth as far as the Adelaide Post Office is concerned, by seeing that sufficient precautions are taken to prevent fires that might destroy or damage the building? Will he also take similar steps in regard to other postoffices ? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CLEMONS</name>
</talker>
<para>- If the honorable senator will hand to me the report which he has read, I will immediately bring it under the notice of the Postmaster- General. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K5R</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SENIOR, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator SENIOR</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is known to South Australia that there is a real need for the enlargement of the Adelaide Post Office. The fire to which <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Newland</inline> has alluded occurred at a timber yard adjoining the Post Office. I bring under the Minister's notice the desirableness of securing portion of the land for PostOffice purposes now that it is vacant. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CLEMONS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I will bring the matter under the notice of the PostmasterGeneral. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>CASE OF MR. HENRY CHINN</title>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUL</name.id>
<electorate>New South Wales</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister of Defence</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MILLEN, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator MILLEN</name>
</talker>
<para>. - Last week an honorable senator asked me if I would obtain a copy of the report of the Royal Commissioner who some time ago inquired into certain charges preferred against <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Henry</inline> Chinn. I now lay that report on the table. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JU7</name.id>
<electorate>Western Australia</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DE LARGIE, Hugh</name>
<name role="display">Senator DE LARGIE</name>
</talker>
<para>. - What is it proposed to do with it? </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator Clemons</name>
</talker>
<para>- It will pass automatically to the Printing Committee. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRESIDENT, The</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT</name>
</talker>
<para>- There is no motion before the Senate. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JU7</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DE LARGIE, Hugh</name>
<name role="display">Senator DE LARGIE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Then I move - </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<quote>
<para>That the report be printed. </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUL</name.id>
<electorate>New South Wales</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister of Defence</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MILLEN, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator MILLEN</name>
</talker>
<para>. - I ask the Senate to pause before agreeing to this motion. We have already appointed a Printing Committee, the function of which is to determine whether or not it is desirable, in the public interest, to incur expenditure in the printing of documents which are laid on the table of this Chamber. The motion, therefore, cuts across the track which is marked out for that Committee. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JU7</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DE LARGIE, Hugh</name>
<name role="display">Senator de Largie</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Printing Committee is not higher than is the Senate itself. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUL</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MILLEN, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator MILLEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am quite aware of that. My second reason for urging that we should not agree to themotion is that there will be only a limited demand for copies of this document. It has been printed elsewhere, and I believe that it will be possible to supply the wants of honorable senators without incurring the expense that would be involved in printing a document which runs into several pages. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JU7</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DE LARGIE, Hugh</name>
<name role="display">Senator de Largie</name>
</talker>
<para>- I know that the greatest difficultyhas been experienced in obtaining a single copy of it. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUL</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MILLEN, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator MILLEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not anticipate that there will be any difficulty in securing copies of the report which has already been printed. In these circumstances, the question may well be left to the Printing Committee to determine. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>Question resolved in the affirmative. </para>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PINE CREEK TO KATHERINE RIVER RAILWAY</title>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K18</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BAKHAP, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Senator BAKHAP</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister of External Affairs - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Have any special or recent reports been made on the country through which the projected railway from Pine Creek to the Katherine River and southwards will pass? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>By whom, and when, were such special reports made? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3500</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CLEMONS</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answer to the honorable senator's questions is - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>The country betweenPine Creek and the Katherine was first surveyed in1889 by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr.</inline></para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">Graham Stewart, engineer of the South Australian Government, and was again examined last year by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Francis,</inline> Superintendent of Railways and Resident Engineer in the Northern Territory. </para>
<para>The country between Katherine and Oodnadatta and between Newcastle Waters and Camooweal has been recently examined by Messrs. Lawrence and Chambers, Railway Surveyors, whose report is now in preparation. </para>
<para>A trial survey of the country between Oodnadatta and Burt's Plain was made by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Graham</inline> Stewart in 1889, and reports and plans furnished. </para>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3501</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K18</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BAKHAP, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Senator BAKHAP</name>
</talker>
<para>- Arising out of that answer, I desire to ask the Honorary Minister if these reports are available to honorable senators? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3501</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CLEMONS</name>
</talker>
<para>-I will endeavour to have copies of them laid upon the table of the Senate. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3501</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT</title>
<page.no>3501</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3501</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MULLAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator MULLAN</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Treasurer, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>When will the Auditor-General's annual report be submitted to Parliament? </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3501</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6M</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CLEMONS, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CLEMONS</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answer is - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>It is expected that the Treasurer's Statement of Receipts and Expenditure during the year ended 30th June, 1913, accompanied by the Report of the Auditor-General, will shortly be laid on the table of the House. </para>
</quote>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3501</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SELECT COMMITTEE: MR. H. CHINN</title>
<page.no>3501</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3501</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KRX</name.id>
<electorate>for Senator Rae</electorate>