/
19250819_senate_9_111.xml
5881 lines (5881 loc) · 335 KB
/
19250819_senate_9_111.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1925-08-19</date>
<parliament.no>9</parliament.no>
<session.no>3</session.no>
<period.no>0</period.no>
<chamber>SENATE</chamber>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">Senate. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1925-08-19</day.start>
<para>The <inline font-weight="bold">President (Senator the Hon. T. Givens)</inline> took the chair at 3 p.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>NAVIGATION BILL</title>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Assent, after reservation, reported. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>DEATH OF RIGHT HON. W. F. MASSEY, P.C</title>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KLS</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GIVENS, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT (Senator the Hon T Givens</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have received from <inline font-weight="bold">Mrs. Massey,</inline> widow of the late Prime Minister of New Zealand,. the following letter:- _ </para>
</talk.start>
<para>Ariki-Toa, 260 Tinakori-road, Wellington, 7th August, 1925. </para>
<para class="block">Dear Sirs, </para>
<para>I have to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of 14 th July forwarding a bound copy and other copies of resolutions and speeches delivered in both Houses of Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia relating to the death of my husband, the late Prime Minister of New Zealand. </para>
<para>Will you phase accept and convey to members of both Housesmy family's and my own sincere and heartfelt thanks for the very kind sympathy and condolence extended to us in our groat sorrow, and also an assurance of our very deep appreciation of the resolutions agreed to and the' tributes paid to <inline font-weight="bold">Mr Massey's</inline> services. </para>
<para>Very sincerely, </para>
<list type="upperalpha-dotted">
<item label="C.">
<para>A. Massey. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY VISIT</title>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KNF</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MASSY-GREENE, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator GREENE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is it correct, as reported in the press, that the Government has invited a delegation from the British Parliament to visit Australia, and, if so, can the Leader of the Government in the Senate say why the invitation was not sent through the Empire Parliamentary . Association? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role>Minister of Home and Territories</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator PEARCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The only knowledge I have of the matter is that an invitation has been sent by the Empire Parliamentary Association ; but if the honorable senator will place his question on the business-paper, I shall be in a position to furnish him with a more complete answer. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KLS</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRESIDENT, The</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT (Senator the Hon T Givens</name>
</talker>
<para>- I can supplement the reply given by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Pearce.</inline> The invitation to a delegation from the British Parliament to visit Australia was sent from the Commonwealth branch of the Empire Parliamentary Association with the concurrence of the Prime Minister. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KNF</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MASSY-GREENE, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator GREENE</name>
</talker>
<para>- That is all right, but it is not what was stated in the press. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRESIDENT, The</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am not responsible for what has appeared in the press. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>PAPERS</title>
<page.no>1471</page.no>
<type>papers</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>The following papers were presented : - </para>
<quote>
<para>Canned Fruit -Bounty Act- Particulars -of Bounty paid, &c, Financial Year 1924-5. </para>
<para>Customs and Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act - Regulations Amended - Statutory Rules 1025, No. 83. </para>
<para>Defence Act - Regulations Amended - Statutory Rules, 1925, No. 132. </para>
<para>Distillation Act - Regulations Amended - Statutory Rules 1925, No. 111. </para>
<para>Iron and Steel Products Bounty Act - Particulars of Bounty paid, &e., Financial. Year 1924-5.. </para>
</quote>
<para>Iron and Steel Products Bounty Act- Statement by the Minister for Trade and Customs of the reasons for allowing the use of certain imported articles in manufactures (Tractors) on which bounty is payable. </para>
<para>Lands Acquisition Act- Land acquired for Defence purposes at Nyngan, New South Wales. </para>
<para>Naval Defence Act - Regulations Amended - Statutory Rules 192:1, No. 133. </para>
<para>Navigation Act - Regulation Amended - Statutory Rules 1925, Nos. 73, 80, 86, 87, 97. </para>
<para>New Guinea - Ordinances of 1925 - </para>
<para>No. 20- Supply (No. 1). </para>
<para>No. 21 - Laws Repeal and Adopting (No. 2). </para>
<para>No. 22- Lands Registration (No. 2). </para>
<para>No. 23- Land (No. 2). </para>
<para>No. 24 - Interpretation and Amendments Incorporation. </para>
<para>No. 25 - Land (No. 3). </para>
<para>No. 26 - Administrator's Powers. </para>
<para>No. 27 - Sanitation. </para>
<para>No. 28- Pounds. </para>
<para>No. 29- Sale of Bread. </para>
<para>No. 30- Dog. </para>
<para>No. 31 - Slaughtering. </para>
<para>No. 32- Rale of Meat. </para>
<para>No. 33 - Venereal Diseases. </para>
<para>Petroleum - Report on Investigations made in New South Wales by <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Arthur</inline> Wade, D.Sc. (Lond.), M.J.P.T., M.I.M.M., A.R.C.Sc, F.G.S., F.G.S. (America). </para>
<para>Public Service Act - Appointment - Department of Health- D. A. Tate. </para>
<para>Quarantine Act - Regulations Amended - Statutory Rules 1925, No. 134. </para>
<para>Shale Oil Bounty Act - Particulars of Bounty paid, &c, FinancialYear- 1924-5. </para>
<para>Spirits Act - Regulations Amended- Statutory Rules 1925, No. 88. </para>
<para>Statement showing for specific incomes the advantage of additional interest receivable by converting 4½ per cent, loan (tax free) to 5½ per cent, loan (taxable) after making an allowance for the additional income tax payable on the taxable interest received. </para>
<para>Sulphur Bounty Act - Particulars of Bountypaid, &c\, Financial Year 1924-5. </para>
<para>Wine Export Bounty Act - Particulars of Bounty paid,. &c, Financial year 1924-5. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>AUSTRALIANWAR MEMORIAL BILL</title>
<page.no>1472</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Bill presented by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Pearce,</inline> and read a first time. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1472</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>FILM INSPECTOR</title>
<page.no>1472</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1472</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KBJ</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role>Minister for Markets and Migration</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WILSON, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator WILSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the14th </para>
</talk.start>
<para>August <inline font-weight="bold">Senator J.</inline> Grant asked the following questions: - </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Is it a fact that an appointment to the position of Film Inspector at Sydney has recently been made? 2.Ifso, what is the name of the person appointed? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>What salary is attached to the position? </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>For what term has the appointment been made? </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>What previous experience did the appointee possess? </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>Was he at the time of his appointment, or previously, employed in the Federal Service ? </para>
</item>
<item label="7.">
<para>How many persons (a) inside and (b) outside the Federal Service applied for the position? </para>
</item>
<item label="8.">
<para>Were the applicants examined or tested f </para>
</item>
<item label="9.">
<para>If so, how many; and, if not, on what qualifications was the appointment made? </para>
</item>
<item label="10.">
<para>What steps, if any, were taken to ascertain if the services of qualified persons within the Service were available 1 </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">I am now able to furnish the honorable senator with the following answers: - </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Walter Cresswell O'Reilly. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>£550-600. </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>The appointment is a permanent appointment under the Commonwealth Public Service Act. </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. O'Reilly</inline>was an experienced administrator of the Department of Justice, New South Wales, had obtained the degree of Bachelor of Arts at the Sydney University, and had passed two years' Law course at the same University for the degree of LL.B. Prior to his permanent appointment he had acted temporarily as Film Censor for about fivo months, during which time he gave every satisfaction. </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>No, but <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. O'Reilly</inline> was a permanent officer of the Public Service of New South Wales. 7. (a) Twenty-nine; (b) 253. </para>
</item>
<item label="8.">
<para>No, but all likely applicants were interviewed . </para>
</item>
<item label="9.">
<para>See replies to Nos. 5 and 8. </para>
</item>
<item label="10.">
<para>The position was widely advertised, and it was assumed that all officers who considered themselves qualified to fill the position applied for it. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1472</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>AUSTRALIAN MEAT COUNCIL</title>
<page.no>1472</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1472</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KBJ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WILSON, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator WILSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the 14th August <inline font-weight="bold">Senator J.</inline> Grant asked - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>What sums have been advanced to the Australian Meat Council by the Commonwealth ? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>What is the amount of the present indebtedness of the Meat Council to the Commonwealth <inline font-style="italic">1</inline></para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>What is the nature of the security against which advances were made to the council, or to the persons representing the council, before it received its constitution 7 </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>Is it a fact that these advances were challenged by the Auditor-General, and, if so, with what result? </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>Whether advances are still being made, or are intended to be made, in view of the fact that a majority of the states have not sanctioned legislation enabling the Meat Council to function? </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>Will the Minister, if it is a fact that a majority of the states, and an overwhelming majority of stock-owners therein are against the principle embodied in the Meat Industry Encouragement Act, take steps to repeal the measure? </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">I am now in a position to supply the following answers to the honorable senator's questions : - </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>£22,500. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>£22,500. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>In consideration of the Commonwealth having agreed to establish a credit at the Commonwealth Bank to be used by the Australian Meat Council, an undertaking was given by leading pastoralists and leading members of the meat industry, that all amounts advanced by the Commonwealth to the Australian Meat Council would be repaid out of moneys to be collected under levies on stock to be imposed by state acts for the purposes of the scheme. </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>No trace can be found of these advances having been challenged by the AuditorGeneral. There is, however, a reference to- the advances in paragraph 145 of the AuditorGeneral's report for the year ended 30th June, 1924. This is, however, merely a statement showing amounts advanced to and expenditure incurred by the Australian Meat Council up to the 30th June, 1924, and contains nothing which can be regarded in the nature of a challenge. </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>Advances are stilt being made to cover the expenditure of the Australian Meat Council pending the collection of the first levy under the state acts of New South Wales, Queensland and Tasmania, and the Ordinance of the Northern Territory. The levy under the state acts of New South Wales and Queensland, and the Ordinance of the Northern Territory, cannot be made before September next. The Tasmanian levy under the state act cannot be made before the 1st January, 1926. With regard to legislation in the remaining states, information has been received to the effect that the Minister of Agriculture, Victoria, promised to use his best endeavours to have the Victorian act passed this session. It is understood that efforts are now being made to have similar legislation enacted in South Australia and Western Australia. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1473</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>IMPERIAL DEFENCE</title>
<page.no>1473</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1473</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMI</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GRAHAM, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Senator GRAHAM</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister for Defence, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Has the attention of the Government been drawn to the debate in the House of Commons on the 28th and 29th July of this year on Britain's naval plans? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Has the following statement, made by the First Lord- of the Admiralty, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. W.</inline> C. Bridgeman, been noted, viz., That out of 329 warships of different kinds laid down by the five great . maritime powers since the war, Britain's share was only eleven, including two Australian cruisers? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Does theabove statement mean that thetwo cruisers being built in Scotland, or any cruiser of the Australian Navy, automatically become part and parcel of the Imperial Navy without reference to the Commonwealth Parliament ? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1473</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JRW</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role>Honorary Minister</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CRAWFORD, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Senator CRAWFORD</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers are as follow : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Section 42 of the Naval Defence Act necessitates an order in council being obtained before the transfer of any Australian warship to the control of the Admiralty can be effected. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1473</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>FLOATING DOCK</title>
<page.no>1473</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1473</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTH</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCHUGH, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Senator McHUGH</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister for Works and Railways, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>What are the principal dimensions of the floating dock proposed to be constructed in New South Wales for the Commonwealth Government? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>What ship-building yard is to be employed in the construction of the dock? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>What is its estimated lifting capacity? </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>What is the estimated cost of construction ? </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>Were tenders called for? </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>Was the State Government of New South Wales consulted in any way with regard to the construction of the proposed floating dock? </para>
</item>
<item label="7.">
<para>If the proposed dock will be used chiefly on the eastern seaboard, what is the intention of the Federal Government in regard to meeting the requirements of the large ports in the states of Victoria, South Australia, and Western Australia? </para>
</item>
<item label="8.">
<para>Does the Government favour the policy of co-operating with the various State Governments in the matter of providing modern floating dock facilities for the states mentioned in No. 7 similar to those on the eastern seaboard ? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1473</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JRW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CRAWFORD, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Senator CRAWFORD</name>
</talker>
<para>- This question should have been addressed to the Minister representing the Minister for Defence. The answers are as follow : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>The whole question is still a matter of negotiation, but for the purposes of the Commonwealth Government, a minimum lifting capacity of 15,000 tons would bo necessary. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Walsh Island dockyard, Newcastle. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>See answer to 1. </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>This cannotbe given at present, being dependent upon a final determination on certain features, which are still a matter of negotiation. </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>Not to the knowledge of the Commonwealth Government. </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>The proposal was originated by the State Government of New South Wales. In March. 1925, the State Government informed the Commonwealth Government that it was . prepared to instal and operate a floating dock in connexion with Walsh Island, subject to the Commonwealth paying a subsidy towards its construction. <inline font-style="italic">7</inline> and 8. The provision of docking accommodation to meet the requirements of large ports is a matter for the states concerned, but any proposals from the Governments of the states, similar to that made by the Government of New South Wales, will receive consideration. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1474</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY</title>
<page.no>1474</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Engineering Standards Association</para>
<para>Appointment of Panels and Sub-Panels</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KPQ</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KINGSMILL, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator KINGSMILL</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister for Markets and' Migration, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Whether it is a fact, as stated in the budget speech in reference to the Institute of Science and Industry, that "Federal panels have been appointed to direct the investigations of sub-panels formed in each state? " </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Under what authority have such panels and sub-panels been appointed? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>On wha t terms, both as to tenure of office and remuneration, have such appointments been made ? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KBJ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WILSON, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator WILSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers are as follow.: - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>The statement refers to the Australian Commonwealth Engineering Standards Association, . and not , to the Institute -.of (Science and Industry. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>The panels and sub-panels have been appointed by the Australian Commonwealth Engineering Standards Association, which is carrying out the work in connexion with the Power-Survey. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>No reference to tenure of office is made in appointing the members. No remuneration, is paid, but travelling and out-of-pocket expenses are reimbursed from the funds of the Association. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>NORTHERN AUSTRALIA BILL</title>
<page.no>1474</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para class="italic">
<inline font-style="italic">In committee:</inline>
</para>
<para>Consideration resumed from 14th August <inline font-style="italic">(vide</inline> page 1444). </para>
<para>Clause 22- </para>
<quote>
<list type="decimal">
<item label="(1)">
<para>The construction of a railway in North Australia shall not be authorized . by the Parliament except in pursuance of an Act of the Parliament, the bill for which was introduced into the House of Representatives : by or on behalf of the Minister. </para>
</item>
<item label="(2)">
<para>If, upon consideration of the report furnished by the Commission in pursuance of subsection (6) of the last preceding section, the Minister proposes to introduce into the 'House of Representatives a bill for the purpose of authorizing -the construction of a railway in North Australia, the Minister shall so inform the Commonwealth Railways Commissioner, and shall . require the Commissioner to transmit to him the following information: - </para>
<list type="loweralpha">
<item label="(a)">
<para>A plan of the railway and of the lands through which it is to pass; </para>
</item>
</list>
</item>
</list>
</quote>
<para class="block">Upon which <inline font-weight="bold">Senator J.</inline> Grant had moved, by way of amendment - </para>
<quote>
<para>That after the word " railway," sub-elause (a), the following words be inserted: - "of the standard gauge of 4-ft. 8½-in." </para>
</quote>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMP</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GRANT, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator J GRANT</name>
</talker>
<para>. - The Commonwealth has, in the northern part of the Northern Territory, cne short stretch of railway on the 3-ft. 6-in. gauge, and it also possesses another comparatively short stretch of the same gauge from Port Augusta to Oodnadatta. I understand that it is seriously intended to proceed with . the construction of lines in the Northern Territory on this gauge. I quite realize that the railways in Queensland are almost wholly of the 3-ft. 6-in. gauge, and lines of- similar width -obtain, in Western Australia. If that had been (he gauge adopted in Victoria and . South Australia, I should have raised no objection to the present proposal. But in view of the Commonwealth policy of unification of railway gauges, and in view of the fact that im pursuance of that policy the line from Kyogle to South Brisbane is to be built on the 4-ft.8½-in. gauge, serious consideration should be given to the advisability -of building further 3-ft. 6-in. lines. I gather from the remarks of the Minister for Home and Territories <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Pearce)</inline> that the 'lines to fee built in the Northern Territory will be of the smaller gauge. This will necessitate all produce from the Territory, consigned to Adelaide or Bourke, or any other station in South Australia or New South Wales, being transferred from one set of trucks to another. All the devices yet invented . to overcome our break of gauge difficulties have failed, and it is recognized to-day by competent engineers that the only solution is to unify the gauges. 'The 4-ft. 8½-in. gauge is now accepted all over the world . as the standard gauge. If 3-ft. 6-in. gauge lines are built in North Australia, Queensland will reap a big advantage. Notwithstanding the opinion- of . some people that the railway -traffic fromNorth Australia will flow to Port Augusta by the direct north-south 'lino when it. is built, I consider that it will flow to Townsville or some other Queensland port. Some of it may go to New South Wales via Bourke. If we build 3- ft. 6-jn. gauge railway lines in North Australia we shall ultimately have to convert them to the standard gauge. Sooner or later all our Australian railways must be converted to the uniform gauge. No one cau say how many millions of pounds this work would cost now, and every year's delay is increasing the amount. Victoria, for instance, is extending her 5-ft. 3-in. gauge railways into the Riverina. I do not blame her for so doing, for she has obtained the consent of the New South Wales Government, but those lines will sooner or later, have to be practically rebuilt on the standard gauge. Railway construction is only beginning in North Australia. The few hundred miles already constructed are not worth considering. In 'these circumstances it is folly for us not to state definitely in this bill that all future construction must be on the 4- ft. 8i-in. gauge. I submit that this is -the proper time for us to provide for that being done, and I therefore ask honorable senators to vote for my amendment. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate>Western AustraliaMinister for Home and Territories</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator PEARCE</name>
</talker>
<para>. - Many of us agree with a good deal that the honorable senator has said, but it appears to its that his remarks are not apropos, for we are not now considering a proposal for the construction of either 3-ft. 6-in.. or 4-ft. 8^-in. railways. Nothing in- this measure will compel the commission to adopt either one gauge or the other. The clause before the Chair provides that before any railways are constructed parliamentary authority shall be obtained by means of the passing, of a bill.. When such a bill is before the Senate, <inline font-weight="bold">Senator J.</inline> Grant, if he is still here, will ha>ve an opportunity to discuss the question of gauges. It is quite possible that the commission will recommend the adoption of the 4-ft. 8^-in. gauge; but, on the other hand, it may consider the building of a light 2-f t. 6-in. gauge line advisable for developmental purposes.. We ought not to hamper it by compelling it to adopt the 4-ft. 8-J-in. gauge. I ask the committee not to accept the amendment, but to leave the matter for Parliament to- determine at the proper time. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXJ</name.id>
<electorate>Western Australia</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NEEDHAM, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator NEEDHAM</name>
</talker>
<para>. - There is a good deal of common sense in what <inline font-weight="bold">Senator J.</inline> Grant has said, and 1 should feel inclined to support him were it not for the fact that the clause provides that all proposals for railway construction in North and Central Australia shall be submitted to Parliament. I understand that a plan of all proposed railways must be submitted to Parliament, in which case it will be able to determine the gauge of the line. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Pearce</name>
</talker>
<para>- -The plan of a railway would necessarily show the gauge. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXJ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NEEDHAM, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator NEEDHAM</name>
</talker>
<para>- I realize thatfor developmental purposes it may beconsidered desirable to use quite a narrow gauge in some districts; a light railway or tramway might be built. Seeing that Parliament will be the final arbiter in this matter, I am satisfied. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMP</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GRANT, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator J GRANT</name>
</talker>
<para>.- What would be the difference between the cost of a given railway built on the 4-ft. 8^-in. gauge as against the <inline font-style="italic">3-ft. 6-in.</inline> gauge? </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K8P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THOMPSON, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator Thompson</name>
</talker>
<para>- A great deal. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMP</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GRANT, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator J GRANT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not agree with the honorable senator. I believe the difference in cost, especially when bridges and earth works are taken, into consideration, would be merely nominal. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K8P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THOMPSON, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator Thompson</name>
</talker>
<para>- It would cost at least 33 l-3rd per cent, more to build a 4-ft. 8J-in. than it would to build a 3-ft. 6-in. gauge line. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMP</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GRANT, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator J GRANT</name>
</talker>
<para>- With all due respect to the honorable senator, I do not think that the difference would be anything like as much as that. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HAYES, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator J B Hayes</name>
</talker>
<para>- It would depend upon, the nature of the country. In hilly country the cost might be more than, a third greater, whereas in. flat country it might not be quite so great. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAIRMAN, The</name>
<name role="display">The CHAIRMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">-(Senator Newland).</inline>- This discussion is hardly relevant to the clause before the Chair. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMP</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GRANT, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator J GRANT</name>
</talker>
<para>- That may be so. sir, but I am prepared to go to almost any length to prevent the perpetration of this injustice. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAIRMAN, The</name>
<name role="display">The CHAIRMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I cannot allow the honorable senator to> proceed amy further along that line-. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMP</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GRANT, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator J GRANT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not, desire to come into conflict with your ruling, sir, but as the Minister was permitted to discuss this question, I thought I would. be given some latitude. <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Thompson</inline> stated that it would cost 33 l-3rd more to build a 4-ft. 8^ -in. gauge line than one on the 3-ft. 6-in. gauge, and <inline font-weight="bold">Senator J.</inline> B. Hayes supported this statement. I disagree with their view. But I shall content myself for 'the present with the statement that, in my opinion, the committee will commit a huge blunder if it countenances in any way the building of railways in North Australia on any other than the 4-ft. 8J-in. gauge. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>Amendment negatived. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXJ</name.id>
<electorate>Western Australia</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NEEDHAM, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator NEEDHAM</name>
</talker>
<para>. - Paragraph <inline font-style="italic">b</inline> provides that the Commissioner of Railways shall furnish the Minister with - a book of reference in which shall be set Forth <inline font-style="italic">the</inline> names of the owners of the said lands so far as can with reasonable diligence be ascertained, a description of the said lands showing the bearings of the railway and the nature and quality of cultivation, the state of the enclosures (if any) and the quantity of the land required for the purpose of the railway. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>The words, ' ' so far as can with reasonable diligence be ascertained." appear unnecessary. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Pearce</name>
</talker>
<para>- The same words are embodied in every railways act. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXJ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NEEDHAM, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator NEEDHAM</name>
</talker>
<para>- That may be so, but they appear to provide an unnecessary loop-hole. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Pearce</name>
</talker>
<para>- Sometimes the names of the owners of the land cannot be ascertained. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXJ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NEEDHAM, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator NEEDHAM</name>
</talker>
<para>- Such words will not be of any assistance to the commissioner. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Pearce</name>
</talker>
<para>- Yes, they will be. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXJ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NEEDHAM, Edward</name>