/
19331206_senate_13_143.xml
5801 lines (5801 loc) · 387 KB
/
19331206_senate_13_143.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1933-12-06</date>
<parliament.no>13</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>4</period.no>
<chamber>SENATE</chamber>
<page.no>5554</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">Senate. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1933-12-06</day.start>
<para>The President <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator the Hon.</inline> P. Lynch) took the chair at 3 p.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>PAPERS</title>
<page.no>5564</page.no>
<type>papers</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>The following papers were pre sented : - </para>
<quote>
<para>Seat of Government Acceptance Act and Sent of Government (Administration) Act - </para>
<para>Ordinances of 1933- </para>
<para>No. 25 - Instruments. </para>
<para>No. 29. - Cemeteries. </para>
</quote>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>5564</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>OIL FROM COAL</title>
<page.no>5564</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5564</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYB</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DUNN, James Patrick Digger</name>
<name role="display">Senator DUNN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the VicePresident of the Executive Council seen a report in to-day's <inline font-style="italic">Sydney Morning Herald</inline> which states - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>The Minister for Mines <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Vincent)said</inline> last night that Professor F. A. Easthaugh, of Sydney University, who would leave to-day ona health trip to England, would make inquiries on behalf of the State into the methods for the extraction of oil from coal. It was anticipated that the information gathered would be of value to New South Wales, in view of the proved richness of the Greta seam coal in oil. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">Will every facility be offered to the professor in making his inquiries in Europe and, if necessary, in the United States of America ? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5564</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTR</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>UAP</party>
<role>Minister in charge of Development and Scientific and Industrial Research</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLACHLAN, Alexander</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLACHLAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- So far as lies within the power of the Government all facilities will be afforded. Probably before the Senate rises for the Christmas vacation, 1 shall be able to make, at all events, a tentative statement regarding the Newnes shale deposits. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>5564</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>JAPANESE INVASION OF EMPIRE MARKETS</title>
<page.no>5564</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5564</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYH</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ELLIOTT, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Senator ELLIOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>- On Tuesday, the 28th November, the Minister representing the Minister for Commerce said that he hoped soon to have an answer to my question dealing with trade and industrial conditions generally in Japan. When may I expect a reply? </para>
</talk.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir HARRY</inline>LAWSON.I am informed that the information is being collected, but is not yet available. </para>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ELLIOTT, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Senator ELLIOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>- In view of the apparent inability of the Department of Commerce to supply the information, despite all the resources at the command of the Government, is it not advisable for the Government to reconsider the matter of sending a delegation to Japan until it is well equipped to understand the commercial and industrial conditions of that country ? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQZ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LAWSON, Harry</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir HARRY LAWSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is not usual to make statements of Government policy in reply to questions. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NEW ZEALAND MILITARY CADETS</title>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DUNN, James Patrick Digger</name>
<name role="display">Senator DUNN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister for Defence inform me whether military cadets from New Zealand are to be trained at the Royal Military College, Paddington Barracks, Sydney, and, if they are, will the cost be a charge upon the Australian or the New Zealand taxpayers? </para>
</talk.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir GEORGE</inline>PEARCE.New Zealand cadets will be trained at the Paddington Barracks, but the cost will be defrayed entirely by the New Zealand Government. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PRICE OF WHEAT</title>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KN7</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GUTHRIE, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator GUTHRIE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Leader of the Senate say whether it is a fact, as reported in certain Sydney newspapers yesterday, that the Prime Minister stated in the House of Representatives that he did not know that wheat was so cheap as to warrant a reduction of the price of bread? If that statement is correct, will <inline font-style="italic">the</inline> Prime Minister and the Minister for Markets be informed of the fact that it is difficult at the present time to obtain 2s. a bushel at country railway sidings for wheat? </para>
</talk.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir GEORGE</inline>PEARCE.I have not seen the statement referred to; but, if it has been made, I do not think it is a correct report of what the Prime Minister said, because he has absolute knowledge of the price of wheat at railway sidings. This information is conveyed to him through the Department of Commerce. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>CANBERRA UNEMPLOYED</title>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Victorian Onions</title>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQZ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LAWSON, Harry</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir HARRY LAWSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the 2nd December, <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Rae</inline> referred to a press report to the effect that large quantities of onions are being destroyed in Victoria owing to the lack of a market for them. The Minister for Commerce now advises that inquiries have been made, and that it has been ascertained that a large quantity of the old season's onions are being discarded in Victoria. Owing to sprouting, the quality is deteriorating, and only a small percentage of them would be of prime quality. The market price is from 20s. to 25s. per ton, or even less. In view of the expenses which would be incurred in collecting these onions, re-sorting, railage, &c, it is not considered that the honorable senator's suggestion that the Victorian Government should be asked to present these onions to the unemployed at Canberra could be reasonably given effect. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>ASSISTANCE TO PRIMARY PRODUCERS</title>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir GEORGE</inline>PEARCE.Senator Barnes has given notice of a series of questions regarding the assistance granted to primary producers. The information is being obtained, as far as possible, and will be furnished to the honorable senator at an early date. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>COUNTRY TELEPHONES</title>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KP8</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSTON, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator E B JOHNSTON</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representingthe PostmasterGeneral, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>With reference to the Minister's statement, in reply to question by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator E.</inline> B. Johnston, that the reduction of £1 per annum granted in the rental charges of metropolitan telephones will not be granted in the rental charges of country telephones, but that other concessions have been made in regard to the telephone services in the country districts, will the Minister state - (a) What are the other concessions made to telephone users in country districts; and (b) what is their value as compared with the £1 per annum concession granted to telephone users in metropolitan areas? </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5555</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTR</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>UAP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLACHLAN, Alexander</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLACHLAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The PostmasterGeneral has supplied the following answer to the honorable senator's question : - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>The most sympathetic consideration was given to the question of tariffs for telephones in country districts; but, in view of the unprofitable nature of those services at their existing rates, it was found impracticable to make any change. The honorable senator is reminded that in the metropolitan areas the charge is as high as £5 10s. per annum, whereas the rates in the country are as low as £3, and are limited to £3 15s. in the areas having as many as 2,000 subscribers. Ninety per cent. of the subscribers situated outside the capital cities are paying £3 5s. or less per annum. With the object of. conferring special benefits on country users, the basis of charging on route mileage was abandoned, in favour of radial distances, on trunk line services, and unit-fee areas were created to allow subscribers to communicate without extra fee with other subscribers on exchanges within a 5-mile radius. In addition, a unit fee of only1d. has been imposed for application in extensive rural areas, in place of the lid. charge which applies in metropolitan centres. Further, in 1929, when the rates were increased in the capital cities, no such additions were made for country areas; but, on the contrary, reductions equivalent to £15,000 per annum were made. If the country rentals had been treated in a similar fashion to those of the metropolitan areas, the excess charges would have amounted to £50,000 per annum.With a view to still further improving countrytelephone facilities, increased hours of service are being arranged at a considerable number of places, and, in addition, orders are being placed for automatic equipment to be installed in selected areas, thus affording continuous service in circumstances where this would otherwise have been impracticable. The total estimated value of the tariff alterations which have been made primarily in the interests of country users is, roughly, £230,000 per annum. If the revised rates for residence telephone service in the capital cities do not result in a variation in the calling rate, or lead to additional services being connected, the loss of revenue consequent upon the change will be approximately £35,000 per annum. There is every reason to suppose, however, that, under the new conditions, there will be an expansion of business which, within a reasonable time, will result in increased revenue, </para>
</quote>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MILITARY UNIFORM</title>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7M</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLETT, Herbert</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLETT</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister for Defence, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>In view of references in the Victorian press to the probability of certain units of the Citizen Forces being authorized to wear the Scottish kilt, will the Minister, before arriving at a decision, consider - (1) The extra cost that will be involved; (2) whether it is advisable to abandon the Australian style of uniform with which are now associated very highly-prized traditions; (3) the effect upon the even flow of recruits as a result of permitting distinctions in dress amongst units ofthe same arm of the Service? </para>
</quote>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir GEORGE PEARCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<para class="block">Yes. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DEPRECIATION OF AMERICAN DOLLAR</title>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQZ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LAWSON, Harry</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir HARRY LAWSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Hardy,</inline> hasasked several questions regarding the depreciation of the. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<para>American dollar. Inquiries arebeing made and a reply will be furnished as soon as possible. </para>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>JAPANESE TRADE</title>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6P</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BROWN, Gordon</name>
<name role="display">Senator BROWN</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister for External Affairs, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Has the Minister noticed a report in a section of the Sydney press that Japan is issuing free government credit to Japanese exporters for the purpose of assisting them to compete more readily in the world's markets? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Will the Minister make inquiries as to the truth or otherwise of the foregoing, and inform the Senate of the result? </para>
</item>
</list>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir GEORGE PEARCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Minister for External Affairs has supplied the following answers: - </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>No. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>If the honorable senator will give further particulars concerning the report in ques- tion, consideration will be given to the matter. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ISSUE OF PASSPORTS</title>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DUNN, James Patrick Digger</name>
<name role="display">Senator DUNN</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister for the Interior, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>What has been the total number of British subjects who have been issued with passports to leave Australia, and who have sailed from Australia to the United States of America and other countries bythe American steamships of the Matson Line during the last two years? </para>
</quote>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir GEORGE</inline>PEARCE The Minister for the Interior has supplied the following answer: - </para>
<quote>
<para>During the period from 1st January, 1932, to 31st October, 1933, 810 British subjects have left Australia for the United States of America, and 3,200 for other countries (total 4,010) by vessels of the Matson Line. It would involve a considerable amount of work and expense to ascertain how many of these travellers obtained passports in Australia as against those who already held valid passports issued outside Australia. </para>
</quote>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DESTRUCTION OF EMUS</title>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5556</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KP8</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSTON, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator E B JOHNSTON</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister for Defence, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Is it a fact that on behalf of the Defence Department the Kellerberrin Branch of the Agricultural Bank (Western Australia) lately sent an account for £24 to <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. D.</inline> J. O'Leary, of Walgoolan, Western Australia, for payment of the full cost of the ammunition used by a section of the Defence Force from Melbourne who were detailed with machine guns to destroy emus in the Walgoolan district in 1932? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Is it a fact' as stated by the <inline font-style="italic">West Australian</inline> that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. O'Leary</inline> has rendered a counter claim against the Department of Defence, as follows: - </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">
<graphic href="143332193312066_3_0.jpg" />
</para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="3.">
<para>Has the Minister for Defence or the Agricultural Bank received a letter from <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. O'Leary</inline> stating that " as Napoleon's ideas are now obsolete, the army engaged in the campaign did not march on its stomach, but in <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. O'Leary's</inline> motor car, the well-fed condition of the troops being responsible for the breakage of the 'chassis of that vehicle."? </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>Is it a fact that, as stated by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. O'Leary,</inline> " the £900 worth of wheat for which damages are claimed was not consumed by the troops, but was destroyed by the enemy, during the delay in commencing operations, occasioned by the necessary war conference between the bank and <inline font-weight="bold">Sir George</inline> Pearce, Minister for Defence, to determine who should pay the cost of the ammunition used in the campaign " '! </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>In view of the low price of wheat, is it proposed to hold a conference or. take other steps to secure the cancellation of emu war debts due to the Commonwealth by either the State of Western Australia, or the settlers on the frontier ?> </para>
</item>
</list>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5557</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir GEORGE PEARCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- If an account was sent to <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. O'Leary</inline> by the Kellerberrin Branch of the Agricultural Bank, as set out, it was not on behalf of the Defence Department, as the following facts will show: - In response to a request, with which the State Government was associated, by settlers in certain districts in Western Australia, I agreed in November, 1932, to allow three members of the Permanent Military Forces to go to the district with machine guns to aid the settlers in their endeavours to protect their crops against emus on the understanding that no cost to the Commonwealth was to be incurred. The military personnel received no extra pay; the State Government undertook to find the railway fares of the military personnel, and to guarantee payment of the value of the ammunition expended. From information which the Base Commandant received from various sources, it is evident that the operations of the military party were successful, and the cause of much satisfaction to the farmers concerned. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>5557</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NEW ZEALAND MIGRATION SCHEME</title>
<page.no>5557</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5557</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K09</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PAYNE, Herbert</name>
<name role="display">Senator PAYNE</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Prime Minister, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Has his attention been drawn to a paragraph in the New Zealand press setting out a scheme as outlined by <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Campbell</inline> Begg, as part of a plan to solve the economic problems of the dominion - the scheme being a reciprocal arrangement between the British and New Zealand Governments under which Britain would remit .the whole of the interest owed her by New Zealand whilst in return the dominion' would absorb 1,000,000 British nationals infifteen years? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>If so, will the Government give consideration to the scheme to see if such a proposal would, be advantageous to the Commonwealth, if it could bo arranged? </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block"> <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir GEORGE</inline> PEARCE The Prime Minister has supplied the following answers: - </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>I have not yet had time carefully to peruse the press report, but will do so at an early opportunity. In the meantime, it is not possible to reply to the honorable senator's inquiry. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>£16,647,000 CONVERSION LOAN. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5557</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQZ</name.id>
<electorate>Victoria</electorate>
<party>UAP</party>
<role>Assistant Treasurer</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LAWSON, Harry</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir HARRY LAWSON</name>
</talker>
<para>[3.15]. - <inline font-style="italic">by leave</inline> - Yesterday, I informed honorable senators that negotiations were approaching finality for a conversion loan of £16,647,000 in London, and it was expected that the loan would be underwritten that day. The Prime Minister(Mr. Lyons) has now received advice from <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bruce</inline> that the underwriting arrangements were completed yesterday on the terms indicated .by me, namely, 3-$ per cent, at 99 for 15 years, with the option to the Government to repay after twelve years. On these terms, theyield, to the investor, allowing for redemption at the end of fifteen years, is £3 16s. 9d., as compared with £3 17s. lid. for the last operation, and £4 ls. lOd. <inline font-style="italic">m</inline> respect of the previous conversion carried out in July. The saving of interest on the present conversion will amount to £243,000 a year. In addition, there will be a saving in exchange, calculated at the present rate, of £61,000, or a total saving of £304,000. The whole of this saving will accrue to State Governments. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>Since October of last year, loans bearing high rates of interest and totalling £78,589,000 have been converted to loans at lower interest rates. The annual saving on all these operations now aggregates £1,523,000 for interest, and £381,000 for exchange at the present rate, or a total annual saving of £1,904,000. The balance of loans bearing interest at 5 per cent., over which we have optional rights of conversion, is now £17,850,000, and it is hoped that a further operation will be carried out in due course to reduce the interest rates on these loans. The press reception of this latest conversion loan, the Prime Minister has also been advised, has been most favorable. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>COMMONWEALTH PUBLIC SERVICE BILL 1933</title>
<page.no>5558</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Motion (by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir George</inline> Pearce) agreed to - </para>
<quote>
<para>That leave be given to introduce a bill for an act to amend the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1922-1932. </para>
</quote>
<para>Bill brought up by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir George</inline> Pearce, and read a first time. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>EXTRADITION BILL 1933</title>
<page.no>5558</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Motion (by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator McLachlan)</inline> agreed to - </para>
<quote>
<para>That leave be given to introduce a bill for an act to amend the Extradition Act 1903. </para>
</quote>
<para>Bill brought up by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator McLachlan,</inline> and read a first time. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>INDUSTRIAL PEACE ACTS REPEAL BILL 1933</title>
<page.no>5558</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Motion (by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator McLachlan)</inline> agreed to - </para>
<quote>
<para>That leave be given to introduce a bill for an act to repeal the Industrial Peace Acts 1920 and for other purposes. </para>
</quote>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>DAIRY PRODUCE BILL 1933</title>
<page.no>5558</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Bill receivedfromthe House of Representatives. </para>
<para>Standing and Sessional Orders suspended and bill (on motion by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir Harry</inline> Lawson) read a first time. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT BILL 1933</title>
<page.no>5558</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Bill received from the House of Representatives. </para>
<para>Standing and Sessional Orders suspended and bill (on motion by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir Harry</inline> Lawson) read a first time. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>FRUIT GROWERS RELIEF BILL 1933</title>
<page.no>5558</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5558</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQZ</name.id>
<electorate>Victoria</electorate>
<party>UAP</party>
<role>Assistant Treasurer</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LAWSON, Harry</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir HARRY LAWSON</name>
</talker>
<para>[3.25]. - I move - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para class="block">That the bill be now read a second time. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">This is a simple measure. Provision is made in the Estimates for £125,000 to assist the fruit-growers, who have experienced difficulty in marketing their crops at reasonable prices, and this bill will give effect to that provision. The average amount returned to the apple-growers of Tasmania has dropped during the last three years from 5s. a bushel case to 1s. 8d. a bushel case. This collapse of prices is due to three main causes - record crops in some States, imports of oranges into Great Britain, and good seasons in Great Britain. Distribution of the grant will be on the basis of export, this being considered the most equitable method of distribution among the States. Any other method wouldnot return so great a proportion to the Tasmanian growers, who are in most need. Details of the amount allocated to each State are set out in the bill, which is recommended to the Senate as a measure of assistance to put the industry on its feet for the coming season. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5558</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1L</name.id>
<electorate>Victoria</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BARNES, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator BARNES</name>
</talker>
<para>.- I have no desire to delay the passage of this bill. Like many other bills, it is brought forward ostensibly to give people who are having a hard time some help in the form of a grant. There would be no objection to that in some circumstances, but in this class of bill no attempt is ever made by the Government, while being generous to others in need of relief, to safeguard the interests of workers in the industry. I am strongly of opinion that when the Government is giving relief of this kind, the workers in the industry should be looked after also. There is no provision in this bill to ensure that those who receive the grant shall pay the wages provided by State determinations or Federal awards. Unless such provision is made, I object to the granting of this money. There are awards governing the employment of labour in the fruit industry. My union - the AustralianWorkers Union - is particularly interested in the matter, because, in Victoria, and I think in Tasmania, certainly in Western Australia and South Australia, and in parts of New South Wales, it covers a large number of workers engaged in the industry. Many orchard ists, while taking advantage of everything given to them by governments, avail themselves of every opportunity to escape their responsibilities to the people they employ to gather their crops. It has cost my union quite a lot of money to police awards in the fruit-growing industry. The fruit-growers introduce sweated labour of any description and of any nationality whenever they can. I regret very much that provision is not made in this bill to safeguard the workers' interests, and I shall try to have an amendment made to that effect when the bill is in committee. Subject to that criticism, I do not object to the Government giving to the fruit industry the help that is considered necessary. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5559</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KP8</name.id>
<electorate>Western Australia</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSTON, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator E B JOHNSTON</name>
</talker>
<para>. - I congratulate the Government upon the introduction of this measure to provide financial assistance to fruit-growers on the basis mentioned by the Assistant Minister <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Lawson).</inline> Although the Leader of the Opposition <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Barnes)</inline> raised an objection concerning the rates paid to employees in the industry, I am pleased to learn that the measure will receive the support of the Labour party. The Government has decided to assist the fruit-growers on the basis of export, which is sound, and the relief to be afforded will be welcome to many fruitgrowers who have experienced considerable financial difficulty owing to the low prices they obtained for their products. I also congratulate the Government upon the fact that this measure does not contain the objectionable restriction which I understand is to be applied to those engaged in another important Australian primary industry, the wheat industry. We cannot overlook the manner in which the Government proposes to assist this industry as compared with the way in which it intends to afford relief to the wheat-growers. The fruit-growing industry is of value to Australia and should be assisted, and I am glad that those engaged in it will not be placed in the humiliating position of proving that they have not any taxable income before they will be entitled to relief under this measure, as is proposed under another bill to afford relief to those engaged in another important primary industry. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5559</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTR</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLACHLAN, Alexander</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLachlan</name>
</talker>
<para>- If the honorable senator will peruse the bill, he will see that some of the fruit-growers must be in a bad position before they will be entitled to relief. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5559</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KP8</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSTON, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator E B JOHNSTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I hope that the congratulations which I have offered to the Government are not premature. The apple and pear-growers will be assisted as provided in clause 4, provided they made a loss on their export operations last year. . Although the population of Western Australia is small in comparison with that of some of the other States, I am pleased to find that some of the fruit-growers in that State will receive a considerable measure of relief. I hope that we can assume that the principle embodied in this measure will also be adopted in others of a similar nature, and that the stigma of mendicancy will not be applied to wheatgrowers by the measure which will shortly be under consideration in this chamber. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>SenatorRAE (New South Wales) [3.35]. - I endorse the remarks of the Leader of the Opposition <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Barnes)</inline> as to the necessity to include in the bill some provision to assist the employees in the fruitgrowing industry, many of whom are paid less than arbitration award rates. The position of many of those engaged in fruit-picking in various parts of Victoria during the last season was most deplorable. Many of them were not only forced to accept less than award rates, but were also so intimidated that they were almost afraid to be seen speaking to 'the union organizer, quite apart from becoming members of the industrial union. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5559</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KN7</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GUTHRIE, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator Guthrie</name>
</talker>
<para>- Where was that ? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<para>SenatorRAE. - In the Shepparton district. Unemployment at present is so prevalent that it is difficult to enforce arbitration court awards, and certain employers have been paying ridiculously low rates of wages. When labour is plentiful it is difficult to police awards, and I trust that the Minister will accept an amendment to be moved by the Leader of the Opposition to ensure that those who receive financial assistance from the Government shall pay fair wages. I have not had an opportunity to study, the bill closely and, consequently, I do not know if any provision has been made to meet the objections raised yesterday on another measure to prevent grants to settlers from being claimed by creditors. Fruit-growers should be safeguarded from those legal sharks who attempt to grab every penny paid to assist deserving primary producers. Provision should also be made to ensure that, in the event of the death of a fruit-grower before this legislation becomes operative, the grant which would have been paid to him. under this bill shall go to his dependants who may have to carry on the industry. I support the bill. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5560</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KNZ</name.id>
<electorate>New South Wales</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HARDY, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Senator HARDY</name>
</talker>
<para>. - I wholeheartedly support the principle incorporated in this bill and congratulate the Government upon its introduction. Clause 4 provides that any money granted under this act shall be for the benefit of fruit-growers who satisfy an authority nominated by a State that they have suffered losses in the export of apples or pears grown by them during the 1932-33 season. I trust that in another measure shortly to come before this chamber, the Government will not lay itself open to a charge of inconsistency. It has been rumoured that the basis on which other primary producers are to be assisted differs from that embodied in this bill, and that a certain amount of discrimination has been exercised by the Government. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5560</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOJ</name.id>
<electorate>Tasmania</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HAYS, Herbert</name>
<name role="display">Senator HERBERT HAYS</name>
</talker>
<para>. - In supporting the second reading of this bill, I should like to inform the Leader of the Opposition <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Barnes)</inline> and <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Rae,</inline> who referred to the non-observance of Arbitration Court awards, that the fruit-growing industry is carried on largely with the assistance of the growers' families. Award rates may not be paid in every instance, but the fruit-growing industry is indirectly responsible for the employment of a large volume of labour in the timber industry, which provides the material for box-making, on the waterfront and in connexion with motor and other transport services. From 40 to 50 large overseas vessels visit Tasmania during the apple and pear season. The wages of the employees engaged in the industries I have mentioned are governed by Arbitration Court awards arid, in view of the special circumstances surrounding this industry, I hope that the Leader of the Opposition will not move the amendment he has forecast. Its adoption would have a serious effect upon other industries in which large numbers of unionists are employed. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5560</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1Z</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RAE, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Senator Rae</name>
</talker>
<para>- I referred more particu larly to the wages paid to fruit-pickers. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5560</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOJ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HAYS, Herbert</name>
<name role="display">Senator HERBERT HAYS</name>
</talker>
<para>- In many instances that work is done by the members of the grower's family and, consequently, award rates are not paid. Apple and pear-growers have experienced great difficulty, and I trust that no attempt will be made by any honorable senator to harass them further. Even when prices are low, the whole of the work of the orchard must be carried on as in normal circumstances if the orchardist is to continue in the business. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5560</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMK</name.id>
<electorate>Tasmania</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GRANT, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Senator GRANT</name>
</talker>
<para>.- I also support the second reading of the bill. As the Minister has pointed out, the price this year will not average more than1s. 8d. a bushel. That represents an absolute lossto the grower. I am pleased to know that the Apple and Pear Council in Sydney decided to recommend a reduction in the quantity of fruit exported, and will also exercise some control over the variety and sizes of the fruit to be sent overseas. The bulk of the fruit exported to England last year, especially towards the end of the season, did not return to the grower sufficient to pay even the freight. The Government can assist the industry by bringing pressure on the shipping companies to induce them to reduce freights. I understand that action in this direction is being taken, and I trust that, before next export season starts, a substantial reduction of overseas freight on fruit will be announced. Shipping companies have suggested that the freight could be reduced during certain months of the year. That would mean the landing of Tasmanian fruit on the London market in the flush of the English berry-fruit season, with disastrous results to the growers. I am afraid we must admit that the season for export of Australian apples and pears to England and the continent is limited,' and that it is useless to export outside the seasonal limits. I welcome the bill, and approve of the proposal to limit the assistance to those growers who suffered an actual loss in connexion with last year's1 export trade. A number of growers sold their fruit at a reasonably good price f.o.b., and, therefore, they should not be entitled to assistance under this bill. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5561</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6P</name.id>
<electorate>Queensland</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BROWN, Gordon</name>
<name role="display">Senator BROWN</name>
</talker>
<para>. - Queensland being only slightly interested in the fruit export trade is receiving a small portion of (the money provided under this bill. The bulk of it goes to Tasmania, and I am pleased to be able to support a proposal to assist fruitgrowers in that State. I hope that, on future occasions, the Tasmanian representatives in this chamber, and especially <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Payne,</inline> will reciprocate by supporting measures for the assistance of Queensland industries. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5561</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMK</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GRANT, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Senator Grant</name>
</talker>
<para>- They have not done badly under the Commonwealth. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5561</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BROWN, Gordon</name>
<name role="display">Senator BROWN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The sugar industry, which is so often criticized by Tasmanian senators, pays a fair' wage to all its employees- That cannot be said of the Tasmanian fruit-growing industry. I am informed that some of the orchardists in the island State are the biggest sweaters in Australia. If this is true, I shall support an amendment to be proposed by the 'Leader of the Opposition <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Barnes)</inline> to insert in the bill the necessary provisions to protect the employees of the industry. I expect that <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Payne</inline> will have something to say about this proposal, and, doubtless, he will combat what I am saying. We are supporting the measure, but with a certain amount of diffidence, because of the allegations of sweating on the part of </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para class="block">Tasmanian fruit-growers. <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Grant</inline> expressed the hope that, before next export season, there would be a reduction of the overseas freight on export fruit. I expect that that honorable gentleman and other Tasmanian' senators now regret that the Government sold the Commonwealth line of steamships. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5561</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMK</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GRANT, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Senator Grant</name>
</talker>
<para>- That line did not provide cheaper freights than its competitors. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5561</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BROWN, Gordon</name>
<name role="display">Senator BROWN</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is, however, significant that immediately the- Commonwealth steamers were sold to a certain gentleman who subsequently spent several months in a British gaol, freights from Australia were increased. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5561</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1L</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BARNES, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator Barnes</name>
</talker>
<para>- The ships are not paid for yet. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5561</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BROWN, Gordon</name>
<name role="display">Senator BROWN</name>
</talker>
<para>- That does not occasion any concern to a Nationalist Government, because the ships were sold to its friends, and what are a few ships among friends.? <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Grant</inline> mentioned a proposal that had been made to reduce overseas freights during certain months of the year, and pointed out that if shippers took advantage of the concessions, their fruit would reach the London market at the flush of the English berry fruit season, with the result that prices would be unprofitable. Yesterday, in the discussion on another bill, I directed attention to the De Raeve process for the chilling of meat, and added that I was reliably informed that fruit, subjected to this new process, could be kept indefinitely. If this process were adopted, it would benefit the Tasmanian fruit-growers, because then they would be able to regulate their supplies to the English market. This is a proposal to subsidize the fruit industry, and of course it is being well supported by Tasmanian senators. On other occasions when we have been considering the protection to be afforded to secondary industries, the representatives of Tasmania have strongly opposed what they termed the support of uneconomic industries. I am not questioning the wisdom of this scheme, but I remind the Senate of the stupidity , of the existing capitalistic system under which, apparently, it will soon be necessary to subsidize every industry. Time 1 after time <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Payne</inline> has protested against the granting of Government assistance to what he termed uneconomic secondary industries. Apparently the Tasmanian fruit industry is now on an uneconomic basis. I am, however, willing at all times to assist any section of the people who are in need of help. On practically every occasion when governments have brought down proposals to assist industry, they have received the full support of Labour senators. But we do not forget the disabilities of the wageearners, and in connexion with the fruitgrowing industry, if it can be shown that the employees are being sweated, we shall take the necessary steps to ensure fair working conditions and wages for them. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>5562</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOF</name.id>