/
19351129_senate_14_148.xml
4280 lines (4280 loc) · 328 KB
/
19351129_senate_14_148.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1935-11-29</date>
<parliament.no>14</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>3</period.no>
<chamber>SENATE</chamber>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">Senate. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1935-11-29</day.start>
<para>The <inline font-weight="bold">President (Senator the Hon.P. J. Lynch)</inline> took the chair at 11 a.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>PAPERS</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
<type>papers</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>The following papers were presented : - </para>
<para>Seat of Government Acceptance Act and Seat of Government (Administration) Act - Ordinances of 1935 - </para>
<para>No. . 17 - City Area Leases (No. 2). </para>
<para>No.18 - Mortgagors' Interest Seduction. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>TARIFF BOARD REPORTS</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Senator A.</inline>J. MCLACHLAN tabled reports and recommendations by the Tariff Board on the following subjects : - </para>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Aerial Cableways and Aerial Ropeways</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Air Compressors of the Reciprocating and Rotary Types having a displacement of 200 cubic feet and over per minute. </para>
</subdebate.1>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Antimony and Antimonial and Lead Compounds</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
</subdebate.1>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Bath Slippers</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Bottles, Flasks, Jars, &c, and Thermometers; and Empty Glass Tube3 up to and including 3 drams fluid capacity. </para>
<para>Brass, Britannia Metal,Bronze, German Silver, Gilding Metal, Nickel Silver, Phosphor Tin, Yellow Metal and other Nonferrous Alloys not elsewhere included in the Customs Tariff. </para>
<para>Carbon Manufactures of all kinds, including Carbon Blocks. </para>
</subdebate.1>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Furniture</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Gears for Motor Vehicles other than Railway and Tramway Vehicles, viz.: - Crown Wheels and Pinions, Transmission Gears, Differential Gears, Worms and Worni Wheels, Internal Tooth Gears, Jack Shaft Pinions and Flywheel Starter Bands. </para>
<para>Gentlemen's Hunting Pocket Watch Cases and Gentlemen's Open Face Pocket Watch Cases; and Wristlet Watches and Cases therefor except Nickel-Plated, Nickel Alloy, Chromium-Plated and Steel. </para>
<para>Packings, viz.: - Engine and Machinery Gland, Piston and Plunger, consisting principally of Woven Fabric and Rubber vulcanized together without Metal. </para>
<para>Perambulators and Go-carts and Bodies therefor; Wheels and Parts (excepting Parts of Malleable Cast Iron) of Wheels for Perambulators and Go-carts. </para>
</subdebate.1>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Portland Cement</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Wood-working Machinery. </para>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>WHEAT AND WHEAT PRODUCTS BILL 1935</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K2Z</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>UAP</party>
<role>Minister without portfolio assisting the Minister for Commerce</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRENNAN, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Senator BRENNAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the 23th November, <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Badman</inline> asked the </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Minister representing the Minister for Commerce the following question, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice: -</inline></para>
<para>Has the South Australian Premier <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Butler)</inline> promised the Commonwealth Government that he will introduce legislation in the South Australian Parliament which will be complementary to the bill concerning the home consumption price for wheat which the Federal Government has introduced in the Federal Parliament? </para>
<para class="block">The Minister for Commerce now supplies the following answer : - </para>
<para>Yes. The Premier of South Australia has informed the Commonwealth Government of his intention to bring down legislation to <inline font-style="italic">give</inline> effect to the decisions reached at the meeting of the Australian Agricultural Council in October last. </para>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>LOAN (FARMERS DEBT ADJUSTMENT) ACT 193S</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KP8</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSTON, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator E B JOHNSTON</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the. Minister representing the AttorneyGeneral, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Has the attention of the Government been drawn to the position of farmers who are continuing their farming operations under the supervision of a trustee, appointed in terms of a deed of assignment under Part XI. of the Commonwealth Bankruptcy Act, and who desire to secure assistance or relief under the provisions of the Loan ( Farmers Debt Adjustment) Act 1935? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Has theGovernment been asked to introduce legislation to permit such farmers to receive assistance under the said act? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>What decision, if any, has been arrived at in this matter? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K2Z</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>UAP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRENNAN, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Senator BRENNAN</name>
</talker>
<para>-The AttorneyGeneral supplies the following answers : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>The representations made to the Government on this matter are receiving consideration, but no decision has yet been arrived at. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>INVALID AND OLD-AGE PENSIONS</title>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KP8</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSTON, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator E B JOHNSTON</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Treasurer, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<para>With reference to the Treasurer's recent statement that invalid and old-age pensioners arc permitted to earn " a few shillings a week ", will the Minister define the exact amount such pensioners are permitted to earn without reduction of their pensions? </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2180</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir GEORGE PEARCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Treasurer supplies the following answer : - </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<para>In order to qualify for an invalid pension a person must be totally and permanently incapacitated for work. Obviously, if a pensioner is able to work, although he may not be able to earn sufficient to make him ineligible for a pension under the income provisions of the law, he is not incapacitated for work. Cases arise, however, where an invalid pensioner receives a nominal amount for performing light services and the pension is not cancelled. It is not possible to state the amount which is allowed to be received under these conditions. <inline font-style="italic">It</inline> depends entirely on the nature of the service rendered and the circumstances under which the payment is made. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>WHEAT FREIGHTS</title>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KP8</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSTON, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator E B JOHNSTON</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister for Commerce, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Has the attention of the Government been drawn to a protest made by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. H.</inline> E. Braine, Secretary of the Wheat Pool of Western Australia, against the increase of wheat freights by sea to Great Britain, Europe and China, published in the <inline font-style="italic">West, Australian</inline> of the 8th instant? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Were these increases (if any) in shipping freights made because the Advisory Committee appointed to make recommendations to the British Government regarding the distribution of the British shipping subsidy had threatened ship-owners with a withdrawal of subsidy unless competition amongst themselves was reduced? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>What steps does the Government intend to take to protect Australian wheat-growers against increased charges represented by increases in shipping freights? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K2Z</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>UAP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRENNAN, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Senator BRENNAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Minister for Commerce supplies the following answers : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>The Government has no information on this point. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>The Commonwealth Government is not in a position to take action in the direction suggested. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CANBERRA</title>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Parks and Gardens Branch</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister for the Interior, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Was a departmental inquiry recently held into matters concerning the Parks and Gardens Branch? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>If so, what was the nature of the inquiry and the result? </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir GEORGE</inline>PEARCE.The Minister for the Interior supplies the following answers: - 1 and 2. A departmental inquiry is at present being conducted. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COUNCIL</title>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KAY</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GIBSON, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator GIBSON</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister in Charge of Development, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Can the Minister give the Senate the personnel of the Australian Agricultural Council ? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>What are the names of the Advisory Board to the Council? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Can the Minister say if a report of the proceedings of these bodies will be made available to the Senate? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTR</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLACHLAN, Alexander</name>
<name role="display">Senator A J McLACHLAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Minister for Commerce supplies the following answers : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>The personnel of the Australian Agricultural Council is - The Federal Minister for Commerce, the Federal Minister in Charge of Development, the State Ministers of Agriculture. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>The personnel of the Standing Committee on Agriculture is - The Secretary, Department of Commerce, the Director-General of Health, the members of the Executive Committee of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, the Permanent Heads of the State Departments of Agriculture. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>The reports of proceedings of the Council are issued only to members of the Council, but all decisions have been widely published. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>AUSTRALIAN IMPERIAL FORCE</title>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Enlistments - Per Capita Cost</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7M</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>NAT; UAP from 1937</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLETT, Herbert</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLETT</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister for Repatriation, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>Based on the number of enlistments in Australia of men and women for service overseas during the Great War, what is the total expenditure to 30th June last, <inline font-style="italic">per capita</inline> of such enlistments, from Commonwealth public funds on account of the settlement of soldiers on the land, and the operations of (a) the War Gratuity Act, (b) the War Service Homes Acts, (c) the Repatriation Acts? </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTR</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLACHLAN, Alexander</name>
<name role="display">Senator A J McLACHLAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The information is being obtained and a reply will be furnished as soon as possible. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>INCOME TAX BILL 1935</title>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Bill read a third time. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>ESTIMATES AND BUDGET PAPERS 1935-36</title>
<page.no>2181</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Order of the day - Estimates and Budget Papers 1935-36, resumption of debate, on motion by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir George</inline> Pearce - " That the papers be printed " - read and discharged. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>ORANGE BOUNTY BILL 1935</title>
<page.no>2182</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Message received from the House of Representatives intimating that it had agreed to the amendment made by the Senate in this bill. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>REMOVAL OF PRISONERS (TERRITORIES) BILL 1935</title>
<page.no>2182</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Second Reading</title>
<page.no>2182</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2182</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate>West ern Australia</electorate>
<party>UAP</party>
<role>Minister for External Affairs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir GEORGE PEARCE</name>
</talker>
<para>[11.8].- I move- </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>That the bill be now read a second time. </para>
</quote>
<para>This bill is introduced in order to make a minor amendment to the Removal of Prisoners (Territories) Act 1923 which provides the machinery for the removal, where necessary, of prisoners from any of the territories of the Commonwealth. While the act is general in its application, its necessity arose owing to difficulties experienced in dealing with white prisoners in the Mandated Territory of New Guinea. It was found by the Administrator of that Territory that it was inadvisable to confine white persons in gaol in New Guinea for lengthy periods, for health 'reasons and because there is no employment which white persons can be given without the white population losing prestige in the eyes of the natives. Subsequent to the passing of the principal act, arrangements were made with the Governments of Queensland and New South Wales for prisoners from a territory to be received into gaols in those States and to undergo the sentences imposed upon them by the courts of the territories. The cost of maintaining a prisoner while in custody in Australia is paid by the Administration of the territory from which the prisoner is removed. Section 8 of the act provides that if the GovernorGeneral or the Governor of a State to which a prisoner is removed, requires a prisoner to be returned for discharge to the territory from which he was removed, the prisoner is to be returned to that territory at the expiration of his sentence for discharge. The section provides further that in any other case, a prisoner, when discharged at the expiration of his sentence shall, on application made in such manner and within the time prescribed, be entitled to be sent free of cost to the territory from which he was removed. Regulations have been made under the act, requiring an application by a prisoner for a free passage to the territory to be lodged within fourteen days of his discharge. Most of the white residents of New Guinea were, prior to going to the territory, residents of Australia, and arrangements have been made with the Government of New South Wales for prisoners from the territory who were born in New South Wales or who were resident in that State for some time before going to the territory, to be discharged in the State at the expiration of their sentences. In the case of prisoners who were born in other States or who were resident for lengthy periods in those States prior to going to the territory, such prisoners are, at the expiration of their sentences, discharged in New South Wales and the cost of their transport to the States in which they formerly resided are paid by the Administration. </para>
<para>Provision is made in the law of New Guinea for the deportation from the territory of persons convicted of certain offences, and if a deportation order is issued against a prisoner who is transferred to Australia to serve his sentence and that prisoner claims a free passage to the territory after discharge in Australia, the Administration is put to the expense of a passage of the prisoner to the territory and of a passage from the territory when the deportation order is put into execution immediately after the prisoner's return to the territory. It is not considered that a person against whom a deportation order has been issued, should be entitled to a free passage to the territory, and this bill is to prevent such persons from having the right of a return passage. </para>
<para>Question resolved in the affirmative. Bill read a second time and reported from committee without amendment or debate ; report adopted. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>APPROPRIATION BILL 1935-36</title>
<page.no>2182</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Bill received from the House of Representatives. </para>
<para>Motion (by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir George</inline> Pearce) put - </para>
<quote>
<para>That so much of the Standing and Sessional Orders bc suspended as would prevent the bill being . passed through all its stages without delay. </para>
</quote>
<division>
<division.header>
<time.stamp />
<para>The Senate divided. (President - Senator the Hon. P. J. Lynch.)</para>
</division.header>
<division.data>
<ayes>
<num.votes>24</num.votes>
<title>AYES</title>
</ayes>
<noes>
<num.votes>4</num.votes>
<title>NOES</title>
</noes>
</division.data>
<para>Majority . . 20 </para>
<para>AYES</para>
<para class="block">
<graphic href="148332193511294_3_1_1_A.jpg" />
</para>
<para>NOES</para>
<para class="block">
<graphic href="148332193511294_3_1_2_N.jpg" />
</para>
<division.result>
<para class="block">Question so resolved in the affirmative. </para>
</division.result>
<para class="block">Standing and Sessional Orders suspended. </para>
</division>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>First Reading</title>
<page.no>2183</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Motion (by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir George</inline> Pearce) proposed - </para>
<quote>
<para>That the bill be now read a first time. </para>
</quote>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate>Queensland</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>. - The Opposition objected to the suspension of the Standing Orders not out of any desire to be freakish, but to register once again our absolute displeasure at the manner in which the business of this Parliament, particularly so far as this chamber is concerned, is conducted. For years we have registered this protest in season and out of season. I know that honorable senators are anxious to go to their homes for the Christmas and New Year vacation. "We share that desire, but we strongly object to the fact that after members of this Parliament in both Houses have been kept cooling their heels month after month awaiting legislation the Government towards the end of the session displays indecent and unseemly haste to put through a pile of legislation within a few days. We are now being asked to pass this measure through all its stages in one day. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir George Pearce</name>
</talker>
<para>- Not in one day. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Well, without delay, and that means that the Government desires to get the bill through without giving us a decent opportunity to discuss the expenditure of millions of pounds. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir George Pearce</name>
</talker>
<para>- Honorable senators may have as much time as they desire to discuss this measure. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Well then I hope no tears will be shed by honorable senators opposite when we occupy the full time allowed to us under the Standing Orders. In spite of the kindly interjection of the Leader of the Government, the fact remains that both in this chamber and in the House of Representatives legislation is being crammed into the last few weeks of the session. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KP8</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSTON, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator E B Johnston</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Senate did not sit at all last week. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall always insist that honorable senators are not paid their parliamentary allowance for fun by the taxpayers of this country. If the business which comes before this chamber does not warrant reasonable attention, then we are taking our parliamentary allowance under false pretences. There is no need for me to reiterate that I do not think our present allowance is adequate; that is beside the point. Honorable senators accept this allowance to do a certain job, but we cannot do that work properly, because the Government does not give us an opportunity to do it. No honorable senator can take up a bill in the morning and on the same day advance reasonable arguments, either in support of or against it. I believe that no member of Parliament should have any other job ; if ever I became dictator of Australia I would see that an adequate salary was paid to members of Parliament, and then would not allow them to have the slightest financial interest outside their parliamentary allowance. Then I would demand that honorable senators attend all the sittings of this chamber. Some honorable senators on the parliamentary pay-sheet rarely put in an appearance here. In fact, we hardly recognize some of them when they do turn up. I am referring, not to honorable senators who are absent owing to ill health, but to those who are in the best of health, but absent themselves in order to attend to greater financial interests outside. Those honorable senators regard their parliamentary positions as a mere side line. I am not alone in this attitude. A few days ago the Melbourne <inline font-style="italic">Age</inline> had something to say regarding this matter. Before reading an extract from that paper, I emphasize that, if I have one conviction more definite than any other, it is that, despite all the criticism of our method of doing our job in Parliament, our position under the British Constitution and our free parliamentary institutions give to us the best form of government that the world has yet conceived. For this reason I am jealous of the reputation of this chamber. But apparently honorable senators are expected to be merely an echo of the . House of Representatives; when a bill is transmitted to this chamber we are expected to say, "Yes, sir," and leave it go. As a matter of fact, if it were not for the activity of the Opposition, despite our numerical weakness, and, I may add, the frequent speeches of <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Johnston,</inline> who has a way of voicing his protest, members of this chamber would constitute a happy family, and there would be no need for us to come here at all; we could attend to our work by correspondence. On this matter the Melbourne <inline font-style="italic">Age</inline> said - </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<quote>
<para>A Parliament freely elected and a Government responsible topeople and Parliament are the institutions democracies have chosen for the achievement of their purposes. A free and efficient Parliament is entirely excellent as an ideal. But in its operation the institution has developed defects which, if uncorrected, may depreciate it in public esteem. Within recent years many of Parliament's powers have become concentrated in the Cabinet; one consequence is that some groups of Ministers seem unequal to their responsibilities. Australians may discern confirmatory evidence in the past record and contemporary actions of their National Government. Legislativeprogress at Canberra continues slow; the administrative spirit seems lethargic. Ministers do not appear to have any of the zest they might have been expected to exhibit after five months' recess. Last Thursday members of the House of Representatives set themselves to discuss general business, with the nature of which Ministers had had abundant opportunity to make themselves familiar. Concerning several items, however, the Government made no effort to present considered argument; it relied upon the passing of motions of adjournment.On two occasions, indeed, a responsible Minister intimated that he had not had time to study the questions. From that source, therefore, neither Parliament nor nation could hope for either, constructive or corrective guidance. To demonstrations of Ministerial apathy have now to be added confessions of Ministerial ignorance. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">I admit that a Cabinet, as a kind of executive committee, is essential to our system of Government, but it should not be left to that Cabinet virtually to do the job; and then throw down its decisions before members of Parliament without giving us time to give to them the fullest consideration. The article in the <inline font-style="italic">Age</inline> continued - </para>
<quote>
<para>The Federal Parliament itself hopes to rise for the Christmas recess next week, not to resume again probably until March. Having been in session for two months, it will rest from its labours for three months. And yet there is a series of extensive Tariff schedules being carried forward by a recurrent validating . process, one from December, 1934; another from March, 1935; another is anticipated when the Government proposes postponement of a full Tariff discussion until March, 1936. Over an even more extended period the Government has displayed similar inactivity with respect to the continuing gross injustice being done to Australian shipping by the encroachments of foreign subsidized competition. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">To that the Opposition says "Hear, hear !" </para>
<para>Both on commercial and national grounds it is essential that Australia should be steadily creating for herself the asset of a vigorous mercantile marine. It is vain to hope that that canbe done as long as the Government puts forth no effort to make competitive conditions more equitable. America's heavily subsidized liners continue to despoil out interDominion trade, while their own far-flung coast line is kept a close preserve. The Government's excuses for its inaction have never been impressive. But even the last of these vanished when it was intimated that Britain had no objection to the voyage between New Zealand and Australia toeing declared a coastal one. The intimation from important shipping companies that unless some defence is provided British passenger and mail steamers between Australia and San Francisco will be withdrawn elicits from the Federal Government nothing more than vague mention of some future conference to which competing interests will , be invited. Meantime Ministerial refusal to take the simple, feasible step of applying to America's subsidized shipping conditions parallel to those America has herself so long imposed is absolutely indefensible. </para>
<para>The accumulation of national business which is receiving little or no attention should make plain to the Government that its first duty is to supply dynamic to the slow-moving legislative machinery. Ministers are so frequently and for such lon" periods absent from their departments at Canberra that their inability to participate intelligently in Parliamentary debate can be understood. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2185</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JY7</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DUNCAN-HUGHES, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator Duncan-Hughes</name>
</talker>
<para>- Who is the author of that article? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2185</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have quoted from an editorial in the Melbourne <inline font-style="italic">Age</inline> of four days ago. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>The Opposition is not satisfied with the answers supplied by Ministers to questions asked by its members. I, personally, feel very strongly on this matter. I shall not reflect on the questions asked by supporters of the Government, but I invite honorable senators to look at the <inline font-style="italic">Journals of the Senate</inline> and see the nature of the questions which members of the Opposition put to Ministers. Not any of those questions is likely to entail a lot of expense, or a great amount of research, in order to obtain the information desired. Questions put by members on this side of the chamber are always simple and to the point, and refer to matters of immediate public interest, so that intelligent and straightforward answers ought to be given to them. Unfortunately, such answers are not always supplied. During the last few days, I have asked a number of questions to which I have received most unsatisfactory replies. The latest example was supplied this morning in the answer given to a question of which I gave notice yesterday. I asked whether a departmental inquiry was being held by the Department of the Interior in relation to its parks and gardens branch and, in reply, I was informed that an inquiry was still proceeding. I am not in a position to say that the inquiry is not proceeding, but I am able to say that those who gave evidence at that inquiry, and were guaranteed immunity from victimization if they did so, are now being treated in such a manner as to make it clear that, if victimization has not already been resorted to, the way is being prepared for it.' Within a week or so, Parliament will adjourn, and yet I am fobbed off with the curt statement that an inquiry is still proceeding. I do not suggest that the reply to my question is not accurate, but I desired to know the nature of the inquiry and I claim that the Minister could have given to me that information, even if he had not been prepared to say what the result of the inquiry was, because matters connected with it had not been finally dealt with. </para>
<para>Another question which I asked recently had reference to the ceremony of swearing-in the Governor-General elect. In reply to my question, I was told definitely that the subject had been fully considered by Cabinet, which had decided that the ceremony should take place in Melbourne. That answer was unsatisfactory to me, and, in my opinion, it should be unsatisfactory to every honorable senator. Australia has established its national capital at Canberra, and yet a national ceremony such as is the installation of its Governor-General, is to take place in another city. The miserable and paltry and, I believe, untruthful, excuse for holding the ceremony in Melbourne, as stated in the newspapers, is that the Governor-General elect is already well acquainted with New South Wales, but desires to become familiar with the other States, particularly Victoria and Tasmania. We are told that the Government has decided to hold the ceremony in Melbourne so that, immediately thereafter, His Excellency may proceed to Tasmania. Portion of my question was deleted because, presumably, the President considered that it contained an expression of opinion. I do not object to that, for I have no desire to be obstructive; but I do not think that the rejection of part of my question was fair to the Senate. My question originally asked why the desire of the Governor-General elect to go to Tasmania should be considered when that State can be reached from Canberra by him as easily as by members of Parliament. There is nothing to prevent the swearing-in ceremony from taking place at the national capital. His Excellency could get away from Canberra in comfort and with expedition immediately after the termination of the ceremony. I am expected to be satisfied with the ridiculous answer given to my question. I am not satisfied with it, and I register my emphatic protest against this ceremony and, indeed, any national function such as a meeting of Cabinet or of the 'Commonwealth 'Bank Board, or of the Loan Council or of a conference of the Premiers, being held away from the national capital. That I am not alone in that opinion is made clear by a leading article which appeared in this morning's <inline font-style="italic">Canberra Times -</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2186</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>THE SEAT OF GOVERNMENT STILL IGNORED</title>
<page.no>2186</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>The reiteration by the Minister for External Affairs <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Pearce)</inline> of the intention of the Government to adhere to its decision to hold the ceremony for the swearing-in of the Governor-General elect in Melbourne instead of at the Seat of Government marks determination to pursue a course that is unjustified by considerations of constitutional propriety and national sentiment. The announced intention is the more regrettable since no adequate explanation of its decision has been given by the Government. Such excuses as nave been offered have been unconvincing. </para>
<para>It is not untimely to recall that there would be no question of where the ceremony would be held if Canberra had been completed to the stage that the Government had represented ten years ago. Thus, Government neglect of its responsibilities in Canberra in the past is a contributing factor to its persistent intention of ignoring the Seat of Government in connexion with the swearing-in of the GovernorGeneral. The holding of the ceremony in Melbourne occasions distaste in the Seat of Government and in many other places where national sentiment overrides narrow state viewpoints. The decision of the Government in connexion with the ceremony is a mistake and the persistence with the proposal is a reflection on the Government's regard for Ulft Commonwealth Seat of Government. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2186</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K3L</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SAMPSON, Burford</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sampson</name>
</talker>
<para>- Why was the present Governor-General, <inline font-weight="bold">Sir Isaac</inline> Isaacs, sworn in at Melbourne? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2186</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>- At that time 1 was not a member of the Senate, but had I been, I certainly should have asked a question on the subject, although, no doubt, I should have been given an answer as unsatisfactory as that given to me a few days ago. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2186</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JY7</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DUNCAN-HUGHES, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator Duncan-Hughes</name>
</talker>
<para>- What government was in office when the present Governor-General was sworn in? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2186</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable senator who has asked that question knows the answer as well as I do. Interjections of this kind are intended to be smart, but their smartness is the smartness of ignorance. A wrong action by a Nationalist government is not made right because a Labour government did a similar thing on another occasion. The Opposition in the Senate is guided by certain basic principles and it is not to be diverted from the path that it considers to be right because somewhere else a Labour Government does something which does not conform to those principles. I should like honorable senators to realize that they cannot trap mc, or my colleagues, by interjections of that sort, which, however smart, do not get anywhere. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>I am aware that at a later stage 1 shall have an opportunity to deal with some of the subjects to which I hav& referred this morning. I' shall certainly have more to say regarding the swearingin of the Governor-General elect when the appropriate occasion arrives. </para>
<para>The retiring Auditor-General has had a good deal to say regarding the accountancy methods adopted by the present Government. I listened with a great deal of interest to the statement made yesterday on this subject by the Leader of the Senate <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Pearce)</inline> and now confess that I found myself in entire agreement with him. But there is another phase of the Auditor-General's report with which I cannot agree. On the contrary, I register my most emphatic protest against the way in which he has reflected on invalid and old-age pensioners. I shall not go into details, because the whole subject has already been well ventilated in the House of Representatives and because I am sure that every honorable senator knows my views on this subject; but in my opinion, it is not right that any official appointed by the Government, and paid out of the public purse, should cast aspersions on any section of the community. In this chamber a year ago, I asked why the Auditor-General's Department had not been transferred to Canberra, and I said that if I had the power, I would give the Auditor-General 24 hours in which to come here. I was informed in reply that the AuditorGeneral had never refused to come to Canberra. Yet responsible newspapers in the country have definitely stated during the last week or two that this is the man, who had successfully defied the Cabinet to bring him to Canberra. I remind honorable senators that I had to be satisfied with the answer to my question that he had not refused to come here. Yesterday in the House of Representatives the Government announced that it would not withhold the sum of £1,538 proposed to be paid to the Auditor-General on his retirement in lieu of furlough. The Labour party for which I speak does not advocate a breach of contract with an individual, but I maintain that this man who has had the effrontery - a mild term to use, considering the circumstances - to slander the old-age and invalid pensioners does not deserve such consideration. Occupying a wonderful position, he has drawn a princely salary and is about to receive £1,538 as furlough pay. I maintain that the Government should have, by withholding this money from him, marked its disapproval of his conduct and of the infamous slanders which he uttered against people who pioneered this country, made Australia worth living in, and laid the foundations for providing the means to pay members of Parliament their allowances and to work in comfort in these palatial surroundings. This highly-paid official, having attacked persons unable to. protect themselves, now shelters within the coward's castle of immunity from political interference. In future an AuditorGeneral, judge or any other official should not be given an opportunity to declare himself immune from political control. Parliament should have the right to impeach this man and remove him from office without any further payment from the Treasury. </para>
<para>During the debate on the amending Crimes Bill, members of the Opposition were informed that they occupied a position of splendid isolation when they ventured to oppose the measure. When I said that our attitude was widely supported I was held up to derision by honorable senators supporting the Government. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2187</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KS9</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>ALP; FLP from 1932</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MACDONALD, John Valentine</name>
<name role="display">Senator J V MACDONALD</name>
</talker>
<para>- They do not read the newspapers. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2187</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Not with a view to digesting the contents as we do. I stated that unions throughout the Commonwealth were passing resolutions condemning this legislation and that some of the greatest legal luminaries in the country had personally written to me to compliment me on my stand. Judging from the smiles of smug satisfaction on the countenances of honorable senators, I assumed that they were doubtful of the accuracy of that statement. I have just received a telegram from the secretary of the Clerks Union, Brisbane, which has a membership exceeding 6,000 persons. It reads - </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<quote>
<para>Have forwarded Lyons, Menzies protest amendment Crimes Act stating proposals inequitable unreasonable. Regards </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">Sanders, Clerks Union. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2187</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KS7</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>UAP; LP from 1944</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MACDONALD, Allan</name>
<name role="display">Senator ALLAN MACDONALD</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is that gentleman a legal luminary? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2187</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I expected such an interjection from the rogue elephant of politics in this chamber. <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Allan</inline> MacDonald is a genial gentleman, but he has a habit of prancing about this chamber and taking the attention of Ministers from their work; when he is not distracting Ministers he is in conversation with undersecretaries. I resent this latest ebullition of the boyhood humour which is peculiar to him; he should have grown out of it by this time. I did not assert that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Sanders</inline> is a legal luminary; he is the secretary of the Clerks Union, which has a membership of more than 6,000 persons. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>I object to the unseemly haste which invariably characterizes the end of a session. Probably the Leader of the Senate will inform me, when he replies, that the Opposition has spoken too much. If it did not cost too much to obtain the information, I would like to know how many columns of <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline> the Opposition has filled this session as compared with the space occupied by the 10 per cent, of other senators who support the Government by voice as well as by vote. I exclude <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Johnston</inline> from that 10 per cent. Less than 10 per cent, of honorable senators who support the Government in this chamber ever have anything to say, if the others break their silence, their remarks are brief and, I add with all respect, more or less unintelligible. But when that 10 per cent, of the ministerial senators devote themselves to serious business their speeches occupy far more space in <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline> than do those of members of the Opposition. I am not complaining about that; our objective is not to talk to <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline> but to give expression to the basic principles of the Labour movement, which, in our opinion, are worthy of mature consideration. If the Leader of the Senate should inform us that, irrespective of how often </para>
<para class="block">Parliament sits, this unseemly haste invariably occurs at the end of a session, I shall not be satisfied with that answer. No excuse can be offered by the Government for keeping this Parliament in recess for five months, meeting for two months, and again going into recess for three months. Like any other honorable senator, I am anxious to enjoy my Christmas holidays, but if the Leader of the Senate had informed us last night : " You cannot have your Christmas holidays but must remain here until the legislation awaiting consideration has been adequately dealt with ", the three members of the Opposition would have cancelled any arrangements they had made and would have replied, " Let us get on with the job ". </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2188</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0F</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PEARCE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir George Pearce</name>
</talker>
<para>- Heroes ! heroes ! </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2188</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>- So far as we are concerned, there is nothing heroic about that attitude. From various platforms in Queensland we have told the people that they should object to their representatives drawing allowances which they do not earn. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2188</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JNT</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ABBOTT, Macartney</name>
<name role="display">Senator Abbott</name>
</talker>
<para>- Mock heroics! </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2188</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>- That interjection comes with bad grace from <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Abbott.</inline> Recently, when submitting a motion to the Senate, he moved me, as no other honorable senator on the other side of this chamber could possibly move me, and I would have been guilty of an assault on my conscience if I had interjected, " Mock heroics " when listening to his sentiments. Still, the interjection leaves me smiling. I realize that <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Pearce,</inline> when he gave the lead to <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Abbott</inline> with the interjection of " Heroics " was not actuated by an .unkindly motive. He canes us at times, but we realize that such chastisement is his task, and we are prepared to submit to it. We squeal and protest, but we ask him and other honorable senators to take our squeals and protests in the spirit of absolute sincerity in which they are offered. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2188</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KP8</name.id>
<electorate>Western Australia</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSTON, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Senator E B JOHNSTON</name>
</talker>
<para>. - In view of the comparatively small number of days on which the Senate has sat this session, and particularly in view of the fact that the Senate did not sit at all last week, I regret that the Government has found it necessary to suspend the Standing Orders to enable a more speedy consideration of the annual Appropriation Bill, which contains no fewer than 254 pages and involves an expenditure of £23,759,770. I cannot refrain from drawing a comparison between the haste with which legislation is approved and Standing Orders are suspended in the Senate today, with a very different attitude that was taken when the Scullin Government was in office; at that time practically every line of every bill and every item of expenditure were most carefully scrutinized and weighed. The Senate might well spend more time than is proposed now in examining the expenditure of nearly £24,000,000. Yesterday, when I was addressing the chamber on the subject of excessive taxation imposed by this government, which like previous governments in the Commonwealth, every year takes more money out of the pockets of the taxpayers, I was limited largely by the fact that, under the Standing Orders, my remarks had to be confined to income taxation. Although some small exemptions from sales tax and a small reduction of one rate of tax have been granted by the Government this year, the Commonwealth is actually taking more money from the pockets of the taxpayers year by year. The estimated returns from taxes for this year have only once in the history of federation been exceeded. The terrific scale of federal taxation, both direct and indirect, constitutes a burden on Australian industry which it is no longer able to bear. It was hoped that the inclusion of representatives of the Country party in the Ministry would at least bring about that repeal of excessive emergency taxation, which is essential to the recovery of industry and the restoration of men in employment. Yesterday, I quoted remarks from <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Earle</inline> Page's policy speech, with which I cordially agreed, in which he said that the Country party particularly favoured the abolition of the whole of the emergency taxation. To-day his party shares the responsibility of government; therefore, it behoves him and his colleagues to proceed to the abolition of these taxes. If the Government will do that it will receive liberal sup- port, not only from the majority of honorable senators, but also from the electors who, having in mind the promises that taxation would be substantially reduced, enthusiastically returned the Government to power fifteen months ago. Up to date this year very few concessions in the direction of reducing taxation have been granted. The Government is actually collecting over £14,000,000 from emergency taxation, which was imposed by the Scullin Government during the depth of the depression and which, of course, was accepted as necessary by a majority of honorable senators, despite the fact that they were notassociated with that Government. If they had witheld their support, the emergency legislation would not have become law. This year it is estimated that the Government will collect £8,850,000 from the sales tax, which was a purely emergency measure. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2189</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KS9</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>ALP; FLP from 1932</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MACDONALD, John Valentine</name>
<name role="display">Senator J V MACDONALD</name>
</talker>
<para>- That is equal to the amount which the retiring </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<para class="block">Auditor-General said the Government has in various trust funds. </para>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2189</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KP8</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSTON, Edward</name>