/
19440914_senate_17_179.xml
2707 lines (2707 loc) · 278 KB
/
19440914_senate_17_179.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1944-09-14</date>
<parliament.no>17</parliament.no>
<session.no>2</session.no>
<period.no>3</period.no>
<chamber>SENATE</chamber>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">Senate. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1944-09-14</day.start>
<para>The <inline font-weight="bold">President (Senator the Hon. Gordon Brown)</inline> took the chair at 3 p.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>DEATH OF MR. G. H. MONAHAN, C.M.G</title>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRESIDENT, The</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT</name>
</talker>
<para>- Honorable senators will regret to learn of the death of our former <inline font-weight="bold">Clerk, Mr. George</inline> Henry Monahan, C.M.G., which occurred in Sydney yesterday.I felt sure that it would be the desire of all honorable senators that I should convey their sympathy to his widow and family, and I have done so. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>AUSTRALIAN' PUBLICITY OVERSEAS</title>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<para class="block">SenatorFOLL- Will the Leader of the Senate state whether the Government has given any consideration to the suggestion which I made some time ago that an all-party parliamentary committee be appointed to investigate and report to the Government on the subject of increased overseas publicity for Australia? What is the Government's decision, if any, on this matter? </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KE4</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Trade and Customs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KEANE, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Senator KEANE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Such a committee has not been considered by the Government to benecessary, but the whole matter of overseas publicity is under review, and an announcement regarding it will be made later by the appropriate Minister. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NATIONAL WORKS PROGRAMME</title>
<page.no>761</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0N</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ARNOLD, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator ARNOLD</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Leader of the Senate give details of the national works programme recently agreed upon between the Governments of the Commonwealth and the States? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KE4</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KEANE, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Senator KEANE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall see that the information asked for is supplied to the honorable senators. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>HAY CHAFF</title>
<page.no>761</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KS7</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MACDONALD, Allan</name>
<name role="display">Senator ALLAN MacDONALD</name>
</talker>
<para />
</talk.start>
<para>Does the Leader of the Senate intend to make an early announcement with re gard to the ceiling price of hay chaff, and, if so, will he give consideration to the granting of a subsidy to producers of such chaff, in lieu of making a drastic increase of the price of the commodity, specially where it is required for the purpose of horse-drawn transport? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KE4</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KEANE, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Senator KEANE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The matter mentioned by the honorable senator is under discussion by the Prices Commissioner and an early announcement will be made regarding it. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BROADCASTING</title>
<page.no>761</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Station 2HD Newcastle - <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Amour's</inline> Views - Station 5KA Adelaide - <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Norman</inline> Haire - Australian Broadcasting Commission's News Service. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZD</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>NAT; UAP from 1931</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FOLL, Hattil</name>
<name role="display">Senator FOLL</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the PostmasterGeneral advise the Senate which of the various interested parties will get the licence for station 2HD Newcastle, and whether the Australian Labour party received any assurance from anybody associated with the Commonwealth Government that, if it purchased the station's equipment beforehand, it would have a prior claim for the licence when it became available? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Postmaster-General</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I understand that the negotiations have been finalized to a certain degree by a company taking over the whole of the shares of the station on the same conditions as another station in Adelaide was taken over by the Methodist Church authorities. No special consideration has been given to any party in the negotiations for the purchase of the equipment, but it. would necessarily follow that any company, whether formed by church authorities or any other organization, that bought the station equipment would receive consideration in the allocation of the licence. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUA</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLEAY, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLEAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Can the PostmasterGeneral say whether he, or his technical officers, concur in the opinion expressed by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Amour</inline> with regard to the future of wireless broadcasting? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>761</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am not conversant with what <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Amour</inline> has said on this subject, and am, therefore, not in a position to say whether or not I concur in his views. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>762</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KR9</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LECKIE, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator LECKIE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the PostmasterGeneral prepared to place on the table of the Senate all papers and contracts in connexion with the three licences about which there has been so much controversy. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>762</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have already answered several questions on this subject, and am prepared to allow honorable senators to peruse any papers in relation to it. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para class="italic">
<inline font-style="italic">Later:</inline>
</para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>762</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZH</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">AMOUR, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Senator AMOUR</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the PostmasterGeneral, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Is it a fact that the Australian Broadcasting Commission has made an agreement with the Australian United Press to take its news through that body every day from Monday to Friday until 1 p.m., on Saturday afternoons, and all day on Sundays? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>If so (a.) Is ita fact that when the Australian Broadcasting Commission made this decision it completely ignored the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Broadcasting which, in its report to Parliament, recommended the setting up of an independent newsgathering service; (b) if the Minister is unable to restrict the Australian Broadcasting Commission in its decision because of his limited powers under the present act, will he have the Australian Broadcasting Act amended so as to give him the necessary power? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>762</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable senator's questions are as follows : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>The Australian Broadcasting Commission has supplied the following comments: - </para>
<list type="loweralpha">
<item label="(a)">
<para>"The majority report of the parliamentary committee recommended, <inline font-style="italic">inter alia,</inline> that the commission should not relinquish its right to collect news independently; that it should retain its present scope and range of Australian " straight news " gathering arrangements, but the committee saw no reason why the commission should not enter into an arrangement for the supply of general news providing that complete independence was guaranteed in the collection, treatment and broadcasting of all parliamentary matter, including reports setting out the viewpoints of Opposition parties as well as the Government of the day. In the opinion of the commission the arrangement it has made with Australian United Press does not conflict with the recommendations of the parliamentary committee. It is purely temporary and experimental and entered into to ensure a more efficient rostering of its Canberra staff and to cover "off duty" periods. No reduction of the commission's news staff in Canberra is involved and parliamentary matter is still reported by the commission's own staff." </para>
</item>
<item label="(b)">
<para>The subject agreement does not come within the section of the act relating to ministerial control. The question of news services on national stations is receiving my attention to ensure that the recommendations of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Broadcasting are complied with. </para>
</item>
</list>
</item>
</list>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>762</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTX</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>UAP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLACHLAN, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator JAMES McLACHLAN</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Postmaster-General, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Will the Postmaster-General lay on the table of the Senate the terms and conditions surrounding the granting of a broadcasting licence to the Methodist Church and the Labour party for station SKA in Adelaide, and also the terms of the sale of this station previously operated by Jehovah's Witnesses? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Will the Postmaster-General inform the Senate whether the Honorable N. J.O. Makin, M.P., was associated with the negotiations for the sale of station 5KA? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Is it a fact that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. H.</inline> G. Alderman. K.C., a well-known barrister, negotiated in the matter of the sale on behalf of the vendor company? </para>
</item>
</list>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>762</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable senator's questions are as follows : - </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>The broadcasting licence of station 5KA Adelaide was renewed to Sport Radio Broadcasting Company Limited in 1943 on the same conditions as those which apply, as prescribed in the Australian Broadcasting Act, to all other licensees of broadcasting stations. The controlling interest of Sport Radio Broadcasting Company Limited had been held, when it was operating 5KA up to January, 1941, by Jehovah's Witnesses, and it was subsequent to the High Court's decision on the legality of action taken against Jehovah's Witnesses by the Commonwealth that the application for renewal of the licence was submitted. When the application was made, it was stated that the shares held previously by Jehovah's Witnesses were no longer controlled by that organization, but had been acquired by the Central Methodist Mission and the <inline font-style="italic">Workers' WeeklyHerald.</inline> The represensentatives of the applicant company were advised that consideration would be given to renewing the licence if the recommendations of the Parliamentay Standing Committee on Broadcasting, with respect to facilities for religious broadcasts, were complied with. Before the licence was re-issued, the company submitted evidence in the form of an agreement which stipulated that certain facilities for broadcasting would be made available to church interests. The Government was not a party to this agreement but, since a copy was submitted as evidence of compliance with the recommendations of the committee before the licence was granted, I am in a position to give the terms of this agreement, which was as follows: - </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>Memorandum as to terms and conditions of agreement between His Grace, the Archbishop of Adelaide,Reverend Samuel Forsyth on behalf of Central Methodist Mission and the Honorable Robert Stanley Richards, M.P., on behalf of <inline font-style="italic">Workers' Weekly Herald</inline> relating to broadcasting stations known as 5KA and5AU. </para>
<para class="block">In contemplation of the renewal by the PostmasterGeneral of the broadcasting licences for SKA and 5AU and in further contemplation of the completion of a certain agreement whereby Adelaide Central Methodist Mission and <inline font-style="italic">"Workers' Weekly Herald</inline> become the legal owners of all the shares (except one) in the companies to which the said licences were hitherto issued to parties hereto are agreed as follows: - </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>The Archbishop of Adelaide will forthwith intimate to the Postmaster-General that he withdraws his application for a broadcasting licence in South Australia and that he offers no objection to the renewal of the licences in question. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Upon the renewal of the licences and upon the broadcasting stations in question commencing transmission, the Archbishop of Adelaide and such persons as he may select shall be entitled to broadcast from the stations mentioned free of all charges (except for land lines to the transmitting point where necessary) for a period of three-quarters of an hour on each Sunday evening between the hours of 8.30 p.m. and 0.15 p.m., provided that if the operating companies' arrangements will permit a further period of 15 minutes shall be granted to the Archbishop of Adelaide on the same terms and conditions and not necessarily on Sundays. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>This arrangement is to be interminable, the intention of the parties being that, subject to the provisions of this agreement, it shall operate during the currency of the licences in question and any renewals thereof and shall be binding upon both Central Methodist Mission and <inline font-style="italic">Workers' Weekly Herald</inline> and each of them and their respective successors or assignees or the purchasers of their interests in the companies concerned. </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>The Archbishop of Adelaide undertakes that no matter will be broadcast during the Catholic time which could reasonably be regarded as offensive or insulting to or in the nature of an attack upon the Methodist Church, the Church of England, or any church associated with the Council of Churches. </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>The Archbishop of Adelaide further undertakesthat if any circumstances arise by virtue of which the retention of the Catholic time (either in whole or in. part) is considered by Central Methodist Mission likely to jeopardize the commercial success of the stations or the value of Central Methodist Mission's interest in the companies concerned or the sale thereof he will be willing to consider abandoning suspending or varying his rights herein. </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>Central Methodist Mission undertakes that no matter will be broadcast from the stations which could reasonably be regarded as offensive <inline font-style="italic">or</inline> insulting to or in the nature of on attack upon the Catholic Church. </para>
</item>
<item label="7.">
<para>The parties mutually agree that this memorandum contains the basis of their agreement and they bind themselves to carry out and perform such acts matters or things as may be necessary to give a practical effect and business efficacyto their agreement. </para>
</item>
<item label="8.">
<para>This agreement shall be void and cease to be binding upon any of the parties hereto in. the event of the broadcasting licences men tioned not being renewed by the 30th June, 1943 (on such later date as the parties may mutually agree), but otherwise to stand in full force and virtue provided that if the licence for station5KA only shall be renewed within such time this agreement shall apply to that station only. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>Dated at Adelaide this 17th day of May. 1943. </para>
<para class="block">
<graphic href="179332194409141_2_0.jpg" />
</para>
<para>Concerning the second portion of section 1 of this question, I am not in a position to give the terms of the sale of this station in detail, because this was not a matter of government negotiation. The legal representative of Sport Radio Broadcasting Company Limited advised me when submitting the application for renewal of the licence, that an agreement had been reached between his company, the Adelaide Central Methodist Mission and the <inline font-style="italic">Workers' Weekly Herald,</inline> by which the controlling shares would be sold to the Adelaide Central Methodist Mission and the Workers' <inline font-style="italic">Weekly Herald</inline> in the proportions respectively of four-fifths and one-fifth. </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="2.">
<para>The Honorable N. J.O. Makin was not associated with the negotiations for the sale of the shares in the stations mentioned. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. H.</inline>G. Aderman, K.C., was a member of the firm of solicitors acting on behalf of Sport Radio Broadcasting Company Limited when it applied for renewal of the licence it previously held up to 1941, and he conveyed to the department the information as to the sale of the shares which I quoted. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>763</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KS7</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MACDONALD, Allan</name>
<name role="display">Senator ALLAN MacDONALD</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Postmaster-General, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Has the Postmaster-General seen the statement in the <inline font-style="italic">Sydney Morning Herald</inline> of the 13th September, in which he is reported as having said that, while he did not know the. price which the Australian Labour party had paid for the assets of station 2HD, the figure quoted when the Church of England had the option was about £17,500? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>If so, will he inform the Senate whether this statement is correct and, if so, will he explain how he was in possession of such knowledge? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Will he inform the Senate whether <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. H.</inline> G. Alderman, K.C, had anything to do with the proposed sale of station 2HD, and, if so. was there any direction from the Government to the original owners of the station's assets, through <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Alderman,</inline> that any conditions of sale must provide for representation on the directorate by the Australian Labour party V </para>
</item>
</list>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>764</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable senator's questions are as follows : - </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>The statement is correct. The information was furnished to me by the Chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Broadcasting. In verification of the statement that negotiations for sale of the assets of station 2HD to the Church of England at Newcastle failed solely on the question of price, I quote a letter addressed on the 2nd October by the attorney representing the vendors, Airsales Broadcasting Company Proprietary Limited - "October 2, 1943. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Martin,</inline>
</para>
<para>Chief Inspector (Wireless), </para>
<para>P.M.G.'s Department, </para>
<para>Melbourne. </para>
<para class="block">Dear <inline font-weight="bold">Sir,</inline></para>
<para>Pursuant to my promise made on the telephone yesterday, I now let you know the position of the negotiations for the sale of 2HD. </para>
<para>When I gave evidence before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Broadcasting, I understood that it was the informal opinion of the committee that I commence negotiations with the Church of England for the sale of the station in accordance with the evidence which I had given to the committee. </para>
<para>I have since been in negotiation with the Church of England at Newcastle, but I cannot understand its attitude. It does not want to pay a fair price for the station. It hopes to get the station for almost nothing. None the less, my offer has not been rejected. It has kept the negotiations open. Any delay in the negotiations is, I can assure you, entirely on the part of the Church of England, which has not yet told me whether it will accept or reject my offer, and whether it wants to make a counter offer. </para>
<para class="block">Yours faithfully, </para>
<list type="upperalpha-dotted">
<item label="H.">
<para>G. Alderman." </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="3.">
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. H.</inline>G. Alderman is the legal representative of the company which previously held the licence for and owned the assets of commercial broadcasting station 2HD Newcastle. The Government did not, at any time give any direction to the company as to the conditions of sale. </para>
</item>
</list>
</item>
</list>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>764</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXE</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NASH, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Senator NASH</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the PostmasterGeneral, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Is it a fact that the Australian Broadcasting Commission recently engaged <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Norman</inline> Haire to participate in a nationwide broadcast entitled "Population Unlimited"? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>If so, was the commission aware of <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Haire's</inline> views on sex before it engaged him for that broadcast? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Are <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Haire's</inline> views on sex offensive to decent-living citizens, and are they calculated to undermine family life, which is the basis of order in society? </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>Has the Postmaster-Generalor the commission received any protests against the action of the commission in giving <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Haire</inline> this nation-wide advertisement for his propaganda on sex? </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>What would be the effect on Australia's future if <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Haire</inline> succeeded in inducing widespread1 acceptance and practice of his views on sex? </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>In the national interests, as well as in the interests of the common good of the community, will the Postmaster-General seek an assurance from the commission that it will refrain from any future engagement of <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Haire</inline> to broadcast in any capacity whatsoever ? </para>
</item>
</list>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>764</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable senator's questions are as follows : - </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>This would be a matter of opinion. </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>The commission states that it has received ten letters of protest against the appearance of <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Haire</inline> in " Population Unlimited " and a number of letters of approval. </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>I. am not in a position to answer this question. </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>The general manager of the Australian Broadcasting Commission advises that consideration will be given to the future employment of <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Norman</inline> Haire on the national stations. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>764</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>HIRINGS ADMINISTRATION</title>
<page.no>764</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Acquisition ok Property at Darwin. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>764</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">AMOUR, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Senator AMOUR</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister for the Army, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>What amount, if any, was paid or recommended to be paid toVesteys of Darwin by the Hirings Department in connexion with the taking over of any of their property by the Army? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Will the Minister supply particulars, in the following form, showing the amount, if any, which was paid or recommended to be paid to any other person or persons in the Darwin area: - (a) Name of person: (b) name of firm ; ( c ) amount paid to person ; (d) amount paid to firm; (e) amounts recommended to be paid to any person; (f) amounts recommended to be paid to any firm? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>What amount was paid to <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Alderman,</inline> K.C., in connexion with his inspection of the Ice and Cold Storage Company's property known as " McMillan's Farm-" at Darwin. </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>Did <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Alderman,</inline> K.C.. submit a report to the Minister for the Army; if so, did that report recommend that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. McMillan</inline> should be paid compensation? </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>What was the cost of sending the Hirings Committee to Darwin in connexion with the claim for compensation by N. McMillan, of the Ice and Cold Storage Company of Darwin? </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>Did the Hirings Committee which visited Darwin have all the papers in connexion with the case to peruse, viz. - (a) all the papers prepared and submitted by <inline font-weight="bold">Mrs. Austin</inline> to <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Alderman,</inline> K.C.; (6) the file held by the Army? </para>
</item>
<item label="7.">
<para>Did the Army file contain the report of Major-General Steele; if so, how did they arrive at the decision that there should be no compensation - <inline font-style="italic">(a)</inline> for the loss of cattle amounting to £659; (6) for the claim for disturbance amounting to £1,500; (c) for the use of the land by the Army? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>765</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KKR</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRASER, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator FRASER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am advised by the Minister for the Army <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Forde)</inline> that it will take some time to collect the detailed information which the hon. senator desires. "When it is obtained answers to his questions will be given in this chamber. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>765</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CIVIL ADMINISTRATION IN PAPUA</title>
<page.no>765</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>765</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZD</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>NAT; UAP from 1931</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FOLL, Hattil</name>
<name role="display">Senator FOLL</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister for External Territories, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>Will the Minister inform the Senate when Civil Administration will be restored in Papua ? </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>765</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7P</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for the Interior</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLLINGS, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLLINGS</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Minister for External Territories has supplied the following answer - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>No indication can yet be given as to when Civil Administration will be reestablished in the Territory of Papua. The ministerial sub-committee that deals with matters relating to the Territories of Papua and New Guinea has the question under review in consultation with the military authorities. </para>
</quote>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>765</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>EMPLOYMENT OF EX-SERVICEMEN</title>
<page.no>765</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>765</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Leader of the Senate, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Further to the question asked by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Cooper</inline> on the 30th August, will he state whether it is a fact that, as stated in <inline font-style="italic">Smith's Weekly,</inline> dated the 2nd September, that returned soldiers who apply to a National Service officer at the Sydney Trades Hall for work in the building trade cannot get a job unless they join the appropriate union? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Has the Minister seen the statement of the Deputy Director-General of Man Power, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bellemore,</inline> that when these men satisfy him that they are members of an industrial union and have served their apprenticeship, they are sent to work? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>What authority, if any, has an employee of <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bellemore's</inline> department to exclude from jobs returnedsoldiers who are not unionists? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>765</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KE4</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KEANE, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Senator KEANE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable senator's questions are as follows : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>No. However, tradesmen needed by the New South Wales Housing Commission are required to conform to the policy of the New South Wales Government that they must be members of a union. In addition, it is also the policy of the Allied Works Council to insist on a similar requirement. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>No. No instructions have been issued to any National Service officer to refuse a starting docket to any man who is a non-unionist. The instructions issued by the National Service officer at the Sydney Trades Hall were that, before skilled tradesmen are sent to employment from the Trades Hall, a check should be made with the unions to ascertain if the applicant concerned is a bona fide tradesman or not. If he is not a member of a union he would need to produce the necessary evidence to the National Service officer of his skill. As the National Service officer concerned receives his instructions from <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bellemore,</inline> I imagine that this is what <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bellemore</inline> really said. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>None. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>BROADCASTING COMMITTEE</title>
<page.no>765</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<para class="block">Motion (by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Ashley)</inline> - <inline font-style="italic">by leave</inline> - agreed to - </para>
<quote>
<list type="decimal">
<item label="(">
<para>1 ) That <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Nash</inline> and <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Herbert</inline> Hays bo appointed to fill the vacancies on the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Broadcasting. </para>
</item>
<item label="(2)">
<para>That the foregoing resolution be communicated to the House of Representatives by message. </para>
</item>
</list>
</quote>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>STATUTORY DECLARATIONS BILL 1944</title>
<page.no>765</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Second Reading</title>
<page.no>765</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>765</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate>New SouthWales</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Postmaster-General</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>, - I move - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>That the bill be now read a second time. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">This bill is short and simple. Its main purpose is to extend the classes of persons before whom statutory declarations may be made for Commonwealth purposes. Under the present act, a statutory declaration may be made before any of the following persons: - <inline font-style="italic">(a)</inline> A police, stipendiary or special magistrate, or a justice of the peace; or (6) a commissioner for affidavits, Commonwealth or State; or (c) a commissioner for declarations, Commonwealth or State; or <inline font-style="italic">(d)</inline> a notary public. That list does not, however, cover all the persons who, by State law, are authorized to take statutory declarations for State purposes. In Western Australia, for example, the persons so authorized include secretaries to roads boards, classified officers of the State or Commonwealth Public Service, and members of the PoliceForce. In Victoria the Evidence Act 1941 gives a wide selection of persons before whom statutory declarations may be made for official purposes. </para>
<para>Inconvenience is often experienced in obtaining a witness qualified to take a Commonwealth statutory declaration, especially in "Western Australia, where settlement is widely distributed. The bill proposes, in clause 2, to meet this difficulty by authorizing any person who may take statutory declarations under the law of a State <inline font-style="italic">to</inline> take Commonwealth statutory declarations in that State. Declarations taken before such persons will, of course, entail the same penalties for false statements as declarations made under the act as it stands at present. Clause 3 of the bill proposes to make a similar alteration in section 7 of the act, which deals with declarations required by Commonwealth laws other than the Statutory Declarations Act. </para>
<para>Honorable senators will agree, I am sure, that the bill will facilitate public and private business and legal transactions, and I hope that the measure will have a speedy passage. </para>
<para>Debate (on motion by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Leckie)</inline> adjourned. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>766</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ESTIMATES AND BUDGET PAPERS 1944-45</title>
<page.no>766</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para class="block">Debate resumed from the 13th September <inline font-style="italic">{vide</inline> page 662), on motion by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Keane</inline> - </para>
<quote>
<para class="block">That the following papers be printed: - </para>
<para class="block">Estimates of Receipts and Expenditure, and Estimates of Expenditure for Additions, New Works, Buildings, &c, for the year ending 30th June, 1945. </para>
<para class="block">The Budget 1944-45. - Papers presented by the Honorable J. B. Chifley, M.P., on the occasion of the Budget of 1.944-45. </para>
</quote>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>766</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUA</name.id>
<electorate>South Australia</electorate>
<party />
<role>Leader of the Opposition</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLEAY, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLEAY</name>
</talker>
<para>.- The budget figures are almost staggering. Prior to the war the total annual expenditure was less than £100,000,000, but it is estimated that for the year ending 30th June, 1945, the total expenditure will be no less than £653,000,000. I shall not go into details with regard to the various items contained in the papers before us, but I shall draw attention to various principles in connexion with the financial proposals of the Government. I think that we are all pleased that the Government has at last realized that the incidence of the excessive taxation that has been imposed has resulted in certain injustices. The proposals now before us provide for certain concessions in the form of deductions from taxable income. Among the allowable deductions in respect of the income of the current year are the cost of alterations made to plant, machinery, and maintenance expenditure. There is also to be a reduction of the sales tax on certain building materials, and increased rebates in respect of dental and medical expenses. The Opposition is in favour of the small amendments thus necessitated in the Income Tax Assessment Act to provide for those concessions. </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">I realize that the Government is faced with a difficult financial problem. The Opposition has drawn attention from time to time to the dangers of the excessive use of bank credit. It is stated in the budget papers that the credit issued to the 30th June, 1944, amounted to £343,000,000, and it is anticipated that that total will be increased during the current year. I was pleased that the Treasurer <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Chifley),</inline> acting presumably on the advice of his financial officers, has again drawn attention to the grave dangers confronting this country by the excessive use of bank credit. I believe that the Government would render a good service to the people of Australia, and to the people of other lands who may intend to invest their money in undertakings in this country, if it gave an assurance that it does not support the statements made by responsible members of the Labour party, and even by some responsible members of the Government, that there is no limit to the use that could be made of bank credit, and that the Commonwealth Bank Board should be abolished, thus eliminating all financial worries for Australia in future. I know that that view is not held by the Treasurer or any of the <inline font-style="italic">more</inline> sane and experienced members of the Government; but the statements that have been made from time to time by some members of the Cabinet have done a great disservice to Australia. If the Government would state definitely that it is alive to the dangers of inflation, and that it intends to be guided by its financial advisers, and prevent the finances of this country from getting out of hand, it would be doing a valuable service to the Commonwealth. </para>
<para>I regret that from time to time the Commonwealth Bank Board has become the plaything of party politics, and I do not think that the whole of the blame in this matter can be laid at the door of the Labour party. I recall, however, the appointment to the board of a man who had played a prominent part in the political life of New South Wales. That appointment did not inspire confidence among a large section of the people. Further appointments will have to be made to the board in future and I suggest that the Government give particular attention to the selection of men with a sound knowledge of financial affairs, irrespective of their party allegiances. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>767</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KKR</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRASER, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator FRASER</name>
</talker>
<para>- So long as they represent vested interests their appointment will satisfy the honorable senator. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>767</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUA</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>UAP; LP from 1944</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLEAY, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLEAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I take no notice of clap-trap of that kind, because I am dealing with important principles. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<para>When the Government made a change from statutory deductions for family allowances, insurance premiums and medical expenses to the rebate system, I asked the Leader of the Senate whether attention had been given by the taxation officials to the increased burden that this alteration had imposed on the family man. I again draw the Minister's attention to this disability. Take a married man with three children, on an income of £500 per annum. The changeover is responsible in his case for an extra taxation burden of £17 16s. a year, plus the extra allowance which he would receive in respect of a deduction for insurance payments and medical expenses under the old system. The tax in respect of an income of £500 a. year is £136 13s., and the rebate for a wife and three children amounts to £63 17s., leaving a net tax of £72 16s. Under the old system the tax would have amounted to £55. I shall not deal with other income groups, but, having regard to the importance of population, migration and the develop ment of Australia, it would be wise for the Government to give close attention to this aspect of taxation as early as possible. Persons without dependants might be asked to contribute something to meet any rebate made in this direction. I also ask whether anything can be done to arrange for a simplification of the Income Tax Assessment Act. This request has been made by various organizations. When a change was made from the old system of income taxation to the pay-as your-earn method, coupled with the fact that the Commonwealth and State taxation systems had been made uniform, there were substantial additions to the Income Tax Assessment Act which made it difficult for even technical men to get a true appreciation of the liability of the taxpayer. The Leader of the Senate will appreciate that when the bill was before the Senate some honorable senators, especially ex-Senator Spicer, who had specialized in this subject, drew attention to these facts. Itis interesting to note that whereas the Income Tax Assessment Act of 1915 consisted of 21 pages and 65 sections, the act of 1943 consisted of 142 pages and 266 sections. The Government would render a great service to the people if the act were simplified. In view of the importance of the development of secondary industries in this country the decision of the Government to call for applications from those in a position to manufacture motor cars in Australia is a step in the right direction. If we are to increase our population we must offer every possible inducement to people from other countries to invest their money in Australia; and as we have encouraged such organizations as General MotorsHoldens Limited and the Ford Motor Company of Australia Proprietary Limited to risk large investments in this country, it is the duty of the government of the day to provide them with security of tenure. A policy which changes from time to time would have a serious effect on the country's progress. I believe that there are numerous people in other countries who will be prepared to invest their money in Australia after the war, and therefore I hope that the Government will see that all possible protection will be given to those who have already made investments here. I have in mind not only the two organizations that I have mentioned, but also various motor-body building concerns which already exist in Australia. Any action that may tend to destroy what has already been accomplished here would be a retrograde step. In view of the statement of the Prime Minister <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Curtin)</inline> that Australia will welcome people from other countries who desire to come here and establish industries, statements by certain other Ministers are likely to have a detrimental effect on Australia's development in the post-war period. From time to time certain Ministers, including the Minister for Aircraft Production <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Cameron)</inline> and the Minister for Munitions <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Makin),</inline> have urged that the policy of the Labour party, namely, the nationalization of industries, should be given effect now that the Labour party has a majority in both Houses of the Parliament. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>768</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L8E</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Aircraft Production</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CAMERON, Donald</name>
<name role="display">Senator CAMERON</name>
</talker>
<para>- Where did the honorable senator see statements to that effect? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>768</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLEAY, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLEAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- On a number of occasions we have heard the Minister for Aircraft Production advocate the implementing of the Labour party's policy. The Prime Minister has tried to steer the Government through dangerous waters, and has endeavoured to quieten his colleagues who have been outspoken in their advocacy of the nationalization of industries. He has said that the Government will provide private enterprise with opportunities to develop industries in this country, whilst reserving to itself the right to set up industries, either on the lines of Amalgamated "Wireless (Australasia) Limited or under complete government ownership. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>768</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L8E</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CAMERON, Donald</name>
<name role="display">Senator Cameron</name>
</talker>
<para>- "Why not quote his exact statement? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>768</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUA</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>UAP; LP from 1944</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLEAY, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLEAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The people of Australia have had sufficient evidence of the failure of socialism, and of the nationalization of industries, not to want a ' repetition of what lias already occurred. It is not necessary for me to gave details, but if honorable senators will study the report of the Queensland Auditor-General they will find that in that State various undertakings controlled by the. Government proved to be financial failures, and resulted in the taxpayers of Queensland having to foot the bill. The same result followed the establishment of the Australian Commonwealth Line of Steamers and the State coal mine at Lithgow, New South "Wales. The last-mentioned undertaking showed a loss of about £16,000 in 1943. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>768</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L8E</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CAMERON, Donald</name>
<name role="display">Senator CAMERON</name>
</talker>
<para>- "What about the success of the Postal Department? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>768</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLEAY, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLEAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- In eleven years government-controlled coal mines in Victoria have incurred losses amounting to about £1,000,000. The Government should take its courage in its hands, and decide either to carry out the policy of the Labour party, or not to do so. Should the Government believe that it is desirable that private enterprise shall be allowed to develop industries in this country, a pronouncement to that effect would allay the fears of a. great many people. If, coupled with such a pronouncement, the Government gave evidence that it intended to follow a sound financial policy, and would as soon as possible reduce the present high rate of taxes, particularly on private companies, and would offer inducements to private concerns to develop Australian industries, I believe that considerable progress would be made. I hope that the Government will consider this suggestion. Unfortunately, industrial disputes have occurred in various industries far too frequently during recent years. They have occurred under both Labour and non-Labour governments. In view of the need to produce goods at reasonable costs, I believe that any government which could ensure peace in industry would do more for the economic success of Australian industries than anything else. I regret, that an extreme element in the trade union movement is causing so much trouble. I do not say that all the trouble has been due to one side in industry, but the policy of appeasement which has been followed by the present Government has done much to encourage extremists, and to incite them to further action. I refer particularly to those holding Communist ideas whose influence has been disruptive. At one stage the Menzies Government took strong action against certain Communist forces which were retarding Australia's war effort; it declared thom to be unlawful associations. I regret, however, that on the eve of an election the Cur tin" 'Government decided to remove the ban that had been imposed on them. On that occasion definite action was taken against two men, Thomas and Ratliffe, who were sabotaging the war effort. They were interned, but the Curtin Government released them. When trouble arose on the coal-fields, this Government treated the Arbitration Court with contempt and continued its policy of appeasement towards the coal-miners. It passed special laws to deal with strikers and absentees in the industry, but it did not enforce those laws. The time has- now arrived when the Government must display courage in dealing with the small noisy element of extremists in the trade union movement, whose actions, more than anything else, will discourage desirable migrants from coining to this country. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>