/
19471120_senate_18_195.xml
2146 lines (2146 loc) · 224 KB
/
19471120_senate_18_195.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1947-11-20</date>
<parliament.no>18</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>3</period.no>
<chamber>SENATE</chamber>
<page.no>2328</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">Senate. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1947-11-20</day.start>
<para>The <inline font-weight="bold">President (Senator theHon. Gordon Brown)</inline> took the chair at 3 p.m., find read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2328</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BANKING</title>
<page.no>2328</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Nationalization : Petition ; Statement by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. J.</inline> J. Dedman, M.P. </para>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Senator RANKIN</inline>presented a petition from certain electors of Queensland in relation to banking in Australia. </para>
<para>Petition received and read. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2328</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>- In view of the importance of honorable- senators having accurate information regarding the Government's intentions when discussing the banking legislation now before the Senate, will the Minister for Supply and Shipping say whether the Minister for Post-war Reconstruction, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Dedman,</inline> was speaking for the Government when he stated that, after nationalization, the Commonwealth Bank wouldhave to make a careful selection of the individuals and industries to which it advanced money?If so, does that not suggest the adoption of a policy of discrimination? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Supply and Shipping</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Leader of the Opposition has referred to the need for accurate information in regard to banking, If there is any inaccuracy, I suggest that it exists in the exaggerated, and inaccurate statements which appear in the press on 'this subject. I cannot accept responsibility for any statement made by any one else, especially a statement reported in the press. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>ADMINISTRATION OFFICES, CANBERRA</title>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<para class="block">Report o:k Public Works Committee. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQF</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LAMP, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Senator LAMP</name>
</talker>
<para>- As Chairman, I present the report, with minutes of evidence, of the Public Works Committee on the following subject: - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>Proposed erection o£ permanent administration offices, Canberra. </para>
</quote>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MOTOR VEHICLES</title>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZ8</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FINLAY, Alexander</name>
<name role="display">Senator FINLAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the attention of the Minister for Supply and Shipping been drawn to a report in to-day's Adelaide <inline font-style="italic">Advertiser</inline> that 3,000 bodies for motor vehicles are exposed to the weather in South Australia, awaiting shipment to various ports of Australia? Has the Minister been informed of the position which exists in the motor body-building industry and, if so, can he say what can be done to relieve immediately the prevailing congestion in South Australia, which is seriously jeopardizing employment in the motor body-building industry? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am aware of the congestion in the motor body-building industry in South Australia. It is due not only to inadequate shipping but also to the fact that when shipping is available there are not adequate berths or facilities in that State to enable the bodies to be shipped. Moreover, there is a reluctance on the part of the South Australian. Railways Department to handle the motor vehicle bodies, the reason being, T understand, that, on account of their size, they do not constitute a paying load. My department is now carrying out an investigation, at the request of one of the motor body-building companies concerned, which has requested permission to transport motor bodies by road. Every assistance will be given by <inline font-style="italic">my</inline> department to facilitate the shipment of these bodies, and also to provide further transport by road. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>POSTAL DEPARTMENT</title>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para class="block">Post Offices in New Settlements. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JSB</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CRITCHLEY, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CRITCHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- As tremendous industrial expansion is taking place in the metropolitan district of Adelaide, and as a consequence new residential areas are rapidly appearing, will the PostmasterGeneral take the necessary action to secure additional sites for post offices in order that up-to-date postal services may be provided in these new residential areas at the earliest possible moment ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L8E</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Postmaster-General</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CAMERON, Donald</name>
<name role="display">Senator CAMERON</name>
</talker>
<para>- My department has already prepared a comprehensive programme for the erection of newpost offices. I shall make inquiries in order to ascertain whether provision has been made for post offices to serve the localities mentioned by the honorable senator. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>HOSPITALS</title>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Patients of Mental Hospitals - Tasmanian Institutions</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7Y</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TANGNEY, Dorothy</name>
<name role="display">Senator TANGNEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Minister for Health and Social Services in a position to inform the Senate of the result of the negotiations between the Commonwealth and State Health Departments in relation to the payment of hospital benefits to patients in mental institutions? </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2329</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTN</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCKENNA, Nicholas</name>
<name role="display">Senator McKENNA</name>
</talker>
<para>- As the honorable senator knows, discussions did take place between Commonwealth and State authorities on the subject mentioned. The States were invited to submit to the Commonwealth particulars of the amounts collected from mental patients and their relatives for the maintenance of such patients in various institutions. That information has come to hand, and at the moment discussions are taking place between the Commonwealth and the States. I hope that it will be possible to reach an agreement similar to that which operates in respect of public hospital benefits whereby there will be no charge on mental patients or their relatives for the treatment and accommodation of patients in mental institutions. An agreement along those lines would involve the payment of certain sums of money to the States, so that the burden of payment would be removed from the patients without seeking to use that medium as a means of affording special relief to State budgets. It is hoped that the arrangement will be concluded in a way which will involve no additional expense on the part of the States but so that there will be a form of relief to patients. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2330</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LAMP, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Senator LAMP</name>
</talker>
<para>- As Tasmania has the best hospital system in Australia, but very little cash, and as Tasmanian hospitals treat out-patients free, will the Minister for Health give consideration to making a grant to that State in respect of that service? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2330</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTN</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Health</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCKENNA, Nicholas</name>
<name role="display">Senator McKENNA</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is sweet music to my ears to hear praise of Tasmania in any circumstances. I appreciate the great part that the honorable senator plays in hospital administration in Tasmania, and I know that he has a very full knowledge of the. position. The Australian Government has been in a position to render very substantial aid to Tasmania in connexion with the appointment of medical staffs to hospitals. I refer both to those employed on a sessional basis, and to salaried staffs, whether the salaries are payable in respect of parttime or full-time services. I have had the pleasure of drawing several cheques in favour of the Government of Tasmania. As the Senate will recall, under the Hospital Benefits Act, the sum of £500,000 a year was allocated to reimburse States which chose to employ in their hospitals for in-patient treatment medical practitioners of all kinds including specialists. So, I may say to the honorable senator that already the Australian Government has made substantial contributions. It will continue to make these contributions. Ample funds are available to assist other States in a similar manner. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2330</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SHIPPING</title>
<page.no>2330</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Refitting of Coastal Vessels - Tasmanian Services</para>
<para class="block">SenatorR ANKIN. - I ask the Minister for Munitions what is the position with regard to the refitting of ships in Australia for civilian purposes? Is it a fact that <inline font-style="italic">Aorangi</inline> and another vessel have been for many months undergoing refitting in Sydney, that other vessels are being refitted in Melbourne, and that still further vessels are awaiting their turn to he refitted ? If so, will the Minister give consideration to having some of this work done at the Cairncross Dockyards operated by the State Government in Queensland and thus expedite the return to the coastal services of much needed tonnage? </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2330</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0C</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Munitions</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ARMSTRONG, John Ignatius</name>
<name role="display">Senator ARMSTRONG</name>
</talker>
<para>- Although, as Minister for Munitions, I am responsible for ship-building, the honorable senator's question deals with the reconversion of ships that were used for war purposes, for which the Department of the Navy is responsible through the Ministry of Shipping. I shall bring the question to the notice of the appropriate authorities and an answer will be directed to the honorable senator. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2330</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVB</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MORROW, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator MORROW</name>
</talker>
<para>- Yesterday, I asked the Minister for Supply and Shipping what progress had been made with negotiations in connexion with the reequipment of the steamer <inline font-style="italic">Nairana.</inline> Has the Minister secured any further information on that subject? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2330</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Yes. <inline font-style="italic">Nairana</inline> will be required for the tourist trade to Tasmania for a period of two months from the 15th December, 1947, to the 15th February, 1948, inclusive. I am pleased to advise the honorable senator that the Government has now arranged for Tasmanian Steamers Proprietary Limited to operate the vessel during that period. Although the ship will be under the control of a company, the Government has undertaken to review the financial results of its operation and has guaranteed that the company shall recover its costs and a reasonable margin of profits for the service provided during the period. One of the obstacles to operating the vessel has been the fact that its crew accommodation requires major alterations to bring it up to modern standards. It was a physical impossibility to accomplish those alterations within the limited time available, and I pay a tribute to the maritime unions for their co-operation in agreeing to man the vessel although the alterations have not been made. A careful study of the Tasmanian passenger traffic reveals that both <inline font-style="italic">Taroona</inline> and <inline font-style="italic">Nairana</inline> cannot be operated economically on the Bass Strait service. The services of <inline font-style="italic">Nairana</inline> are really needed only for the duration of the brief tourist season and for a shorter period in winter when <inline font-style="italic">Taroona</inline> is laid up. <inline font-style="italic">Nairana</inline> was built specially for the Bass Strait service, and it lacks the endurance required for successful operation on other routes. The claims of the Tasmanian people for a regular and assured service are recognized by the Government. Inquiries as to methods by which such a service may be provided have been in progress for some time and are being continued. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2331</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>HOUSING</title>
<page.no>2331</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Sena tor CLOTHIER. - Has the Minister representing the Minister for Works and Housing seen the Commonwealth Statistician's report, which indicates that there has been a general increase of the supply of basic building materials since the termination of war? Can he inform me whether there has been a corresponding step-up in the number of homes completed ? How does the present rate of construction of houses compare with that of pre-war years? </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2331</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0C</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ARMSTRONG, John Ignatius</name>
<name role="display">Senator ARMSTRONG</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable senator was asgood enough to inform me thathe intended to ask this question, and I consulted the Minister for Works and Housing, who has supplied the following answer: - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>Yes, Ihaveseenthe report, anditgives me muchpleasure to inform the honorable senator that there has been a considerable increase of the numberof homes completed. In1945-46, the first year after the war, the numberof homes completed whs approximately 14,000. In1946-47, the number was approximately 32,000, and in addition some5,000 homes were provided by the conversion of service establishments.For the first three months of the 1947- 48 financial year, the commencement of houses was at the rate of 32,000 a year, and it is expectedthat the number completed will be a record. The completion of 32,000 houses in 1946-47 was5,000in excess of the 27,000 average for the ten years prior to the war. </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2331</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYA</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'BYRNE, Justin</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'BYRNE</name>
</talker>
<para>- It has come to my notice that an offer has been made from Finland to sell 10,000 pre-fabricated houses to Australia. Will the Minister representing the Minister for Works and Housing inform me whether this is a fact ? </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">If so, are negotiations in progress to relieve the housing shortage by importing prefabricated houses ? </para>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2331</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0C</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ARMSTRONG, John Ignatius</name>
<name role="display">Senator ARMSTRONG</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have no knowledge of such an offer. I shall discuss the matter with the Minister for Works and Housing and ensure that an answer shall be supplied to the honorable senator. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2331</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>HIGH COURT</title>
<page.no>2331</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Tenure of Justices</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2331</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOU</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENDRICKSON, Albion</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENDRICKSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Acting Attorney-General whether it is a fact, as claimed in certain sections of the press and by certain members of the Opposition parties in the House of Representatives, that justices of the High Court are guaranteed life appointmentsunder the Commonwealth Constitution? If it is not a. fact that the Constitution ensures such life appointments, why are the present members of the High Court Bench and other federal court benches guaranteed life occupancy of their respective offices? Has any attempt been made at any time to appoint judges of a federal court other than the High Court for a limited period ? If so, what was the result? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2331</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTN</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCKENNA, Nicholas</name>
<name role="display">Senator McKENNA</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Commonwealth Constitution does not expressly mention life tenure for justices of the High Court. However, section 72 provides that justices shall not he removed except on an address from both Houses of Parliament on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity. Both the High Court in 1918, and the Privy Council in 1930, expressed the view that, under this section, it is not competent, either with or without legislation by the Commonwealth Parliament, to appoint justices of the High Court or any other federal court with anything but a. life tenure of their office. In the early years of the Commonwealth Arbitration Court, the act provided that the President was to hold office during good behaviour for seven years subject to removal on address from both Houses. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>It was held by the High Court in <inline font-style="italic">Alexander's</inline> case in 1918 that, as the appointment of the President for a period of seven years was at variance with section 72, the Arbitration Court was unable to exercise any strictly judicial powers, but only the powers of conciliation and arbitration. The result was that awards had to be enforced in other courts. In 1926, the act was amended to provide for the appointment of judges with a life tenure, so that since then the court has been able to exercise judicial as well as arbitral powers. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BROADCASTING</title>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Australian Broadcasting Commission: Position of <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. McCarthy.</inline></para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZH</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">AMOUR, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Senator AMOUR</name>
</talker>
<para>- Recently, I asked a question of the Postmaster-General regarding the dismissal of <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. McCarthy</inline> fromthe Australian Broadcasting Commission by the general manager. Yesterday, the Postmaster-General, in reply to the question, stated that, according to the commission, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. McCarthy</inline> had received, not only his full legal rights, but concessions beyond those rights. I am informed by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. McCarthy</inline> that this was not so. I now ask the Postmaster-General whether he will have laid on the table of the Senate the papers relating to the hearing of the case by a special committee of the Australian Broadcasting Commission ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L8E</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CAMERON, Donald</name>
<name role="display">Senator CAMERON</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answer that I gave yesterday was supplied to me by officers of the Postmaster-General's Department and of the Australian Broadcasting Commission. I shall give consideration to the honorable senator's request for the tabling of the papers and supply him with an answer to-morrow. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>GOVERNOR-GENERAL</title>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0N</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ARNOLD, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator ARNOLD</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister representing the Attorney-General whether his attention has been directed to the campaign now being carried on in this country by a section of the press to hold up to ridicule the representative of His Majesty the King in this country? Does the Minister agree that such a campaign is prejudicial to good government in Australia, and an affront to the Governor-General ? If so, will the Minister ensure that this Parliament shall take the necessary steps to protect His Majesty's representative in Australia? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTN</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCKENNA, Nicholas</name>
<name role="display">Senator McKENNA</name>
</talker>
<para>- My attention has not been directed to the campaign to which the honorable senator has referred ; but if there is a campaign that tends to belittle the office of the Governor-General or its occupant every member of the Government will greatly deplore it. There is far too great a tendency in this country for people to deprecate our institutions and our public men. I agree with the statement implicit in the honorable senator's question, that any such campaign is an insult to the Constitution, to the Governor-General, and, through him, to the King whom he represents. If the honorable senator will draw my attention to any particular instances of the campaignto which he refers,I shall have inquiries made and take whatever steps are appropriate after a full investigation of the position. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>COMMUNISM</title>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>-I. ask the Minister for Supply and Shipping whether it is a fact that the Prime Minister stated recently that the Government would not take any action to suppress the Australian Communist party. If so, is the Minister in a position to inform the Senate of the reasons for that decision? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2332</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Leader of the Opposition is certainly setting me some problems this afternoon. First, I am asked to gaze into the crystal glass to see whether I can obtain some information in regard to matters that apparently are floating around in the press of this country; now, the Leader of the Opposition asks me whether I can determine the action of the Prime Minister in regard to a matter about which the honorable senator has probably read in the press. I shall not disguise the fact that I do not intend to supply the information that the honorable gentleman seeks. If he is anxious to obtain information from the Prime Minister I shall have much pleasure in conveying his request to that right honorable gentleman and I have no doubt that the Prime Minister will be prepared to speak for himself. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>WHALING</title>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JSB</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CRITCHLEY, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CRITCHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister representing the Minister for External Affairs say whether approval has been given for further Japanese whaling expeditions to the Antarctic next season? If so, have all. the conditions prescribed by the Australian Government in respect of this season's expeditions been carried out? Is an Australian observer accompanying all the present expeditions? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTN</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCKENNA, Nicholas</name>
<name role="display">Senator McKENNA</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not at my disposal the exact information that the honorable senator seeks. I understand, however, that approval has been given by the American authorities in Japan for a further Japanese whaling expedition to the Antarctic. On the representation of Australia and other countries, precautions have been taken to ensure that the international conditions laid down for the conduct of whaling operations shall be observed. I understand that arrangements have been made for observers to accompany the expedition to ensure that the international conventions shall be adhered to, but I am unable at this stage to say whether or not these observers are Australians. I shall make further inquiries from the Acting Minister for External Affairs, and obtain the information that the honorable senator desires. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CORNSACKS</title>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JUL</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEVLIN, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator DEVLIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister representing the Minister for Commerce and Agriculture, what is the position regarding the supply of bags for the handling of wheat, oats and barley at the coming harvest? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQY</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Trade and Customs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COURTICE, Benjamin</name>
<name role="display">Senator COURTICE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I know that the Minister has given considerable attention to this matter, and I am sure that he has it well in hand. I shall bring the honorable senator's question to his notice. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>COMMONWEALTH CONSTITUTION</title>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZI</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'SULLIVAN, Neil</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'SULLIVAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Leader of the Senate whether the Government intends to hold a referendum on the alteration of the Commonwealth Constitution early next year? If so, will the questions to be submitted contain proposals for such alterations of the </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Constitution as will enable the Government to carry out fully the Labour party's policy for the complete nationalization of industry? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Government does propose to hold a referendum next year, but the Government is quite competent to decide what questions it will submit to the people. It does not require any outside advice in that respect. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>RAIL TRANSPORT</title>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Canberra Services</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister for the Interior, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Has the Minister or his department received complaints that the train service between Sydney and Canberra, and Melbourne and Canberra, has deteriorated, not only regarding the time taken for the journey but also the rolling-stock used? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>If so, has any action been taken to rectify the matter? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Is it a fact that, on 11th and 18th November, the journey from Melbourne occupied between sixteen and seventeen hours; if so, will he ascertain the causes of the delay and make a statement to the Senate on the matter? </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>Will the Minister take immediate action to ensure that travellers to Canberra by rail are given a more speedy and modern service? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2333</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0C</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ARMSTRONG, John Ignatius</name>
<name role="display">Senator ARMSTRONG</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Minister for the Interior has supplied the following answer, which, with the consent of honorable senators, I shall have incorporated in <inline font-style="italic">Hansard: -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>While no specific complaints have been received, it has been recognized for some time that the train service to Canberra needs improvement. With the exception of the portion of the line from Canberra to Queanbeyan, the line is part of the State railway system. The rolling-stock is the property of New South Wales, which is responsible for its maintenance and cleaning. The decision with regard to running schedules rests solely with the New South Wales department. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Representations have been made in the past to the New South Wales department for an improved train service to Canberra. It is clear from the replies received that the State department is satisfied that the service to Canberra is a reasonable one having regard to the general requirements on the railway system. It is also clear that the State would expect the Commonwealth Government to meet the full cost of any improvements outside those requirements. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Yes. This is the time taken under the normal time-table. Arrangements were completed in 193G for an additional train to be run from Goulburn at G.40 a.m. to Canberra on Wednesday of each week. This was designed to give a better service particularly to persons travelling on parliamentary business to Canberra from the southern States. At the time the arrangement was made, this special train arrived in Canberra considerably earlier than the normal time-table, which still applied to other days of the week. For this service it was agreed that the Commonwealth Government should pay the New South WalesRailways Department the sum of £1,000 per annum. Subsequently, the New South Wales department agreed to run the special early train on Tuesdays without cost to the Commonwealth. This was in addition to the early train on Wednesday. Until the early war years this service was carried out regularly. Later it. was discontinued for lengthy periods due to coal shortages and other causes. It was discontinued in June lastdue to the general coal shortage. Consideration was recently given to the re-institution of the early trains on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. The New South Wales Railways Department indicated that the withdrawal of the early train from Goulburn had not affected the department's capacity to deal with traffic offering on the line, and that the special service would not be re-introduced without payment of £1,000 per annum by the Commonwealth. It was decided to arrange as an alternative for the running of the early train as required on the basis of £20 per journey. Under this arrangement one curly train was run each week for the six weeks ended the 4th November last. The check showed that the parliamentary passengers travelling by the train did not warrant the expense involved. In the last three weeks of the period the number of passengers carried on each occasion was two, three and two, respectively. Further, the departure of the early train from Goulburn had been put back from6.40 a.m. to 7.5 a.m., resulting in the train arriving in Canberra at 9.17 a.m.,a saving in time of a little more than one and a half hours. The normal time-table train arrives at 10.52 a.m.In the circumstances, it has been decided not to request the running of the early train until conditions change materially. </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>The Minister for the Interior is arranging to take up again with the New South Wales authorities the possibility of effecting improvements in the existing running schedules which would result in a more speedy service. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2334</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>LAND SETTLEMENT OF EX-SERVICEMEN</title>
<page.no>2334</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2334</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQN</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOKE, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOKE</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Treasurer, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Has the Treasurer given consideration to making payment to roads boards and/or local governing authorities of an amount equivalent to revenue lost by such authorities in rates and other charges as a result of acquisition of property by the Commonwealth Government for soldier land settlement? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2334</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Treasurer has supplied the following answers: - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Under the war service land settlement agreements between the Commonwealth and the States, the States, not the Commonwealth, acquire property for the land settlement of exservicemen. The loss of rates and other charges sustained by roadsboards and/or local governing authorities is therefore a matter between the States and the local bodies concerned. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Sec answer to No. 1. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>TRADING WITH THE ENEMY BILL 1947</title>
<page.no>2334</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Motion (by SenatorCourtice) agreed to- </para>
<quote>
<para>That leave be given to bring up a bill for an act to amend the Trading with the Enemy Act 1939-1940, and for other purposes. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">Bill presented, and read a first time. </para>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>BANKING BILL 1947</title>
<page.no>2334</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Second Reading</title>
<page.no>2334</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Debate resumed from the 19th November <inline font-style="italic">{vide</inline> page 2244), on motion by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Ashley</inline> - </para>
<quote>
<para>That the bill be now read a second time. </para>
</quote>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2334</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate>Queensland</electorate>
<party />
<role>Leader of the Opposition</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>. - I listened with great attention to the speech delivered last night by the Minister for Supply and Shipping <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Ashley)</inline> in moving the second reading of the bill.. I have also read with care the speech made by the Prime Minister <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Chifley)</inline> when moving the second readingof the bill in the House of Representatives. Comparing the two speeches, I notice that that delivered in this chamber by the Minister for Supply and Shipping omitted many matters contained in the Prime Minister's speech which were severely criticized by the Leader of the Opposition in the Houseof Representatives <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Menzies).</inline> Both the Prime Minister and the Minister for Supply and Shipping stressed the urgency of this measure, but neither of them gave any valid reason in that respect. Both stated that the object of the measure is to enable the Government to deal with economic and financial problems inthe transition period from war to peace and in the future. They said that the bill is designed to stabilize our "financial economy. The Prime Minister, when speaking on this measure and also in his budget speech, emphasized the buoyancy of the country's finances and -expressed the Government's pride in the fact that unemployment is now lower than it has ever been previously in the history of this country. The Opposition parties also rejoice in those facts; but is it not clear that the claim made by the Government that this measure is urgent because of the need to stabilize the country's finances is in direct contradiction of those statements of the Prime Minister? Obviously, no urgency for this measure exists at all. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>The Prime Minister admitted that the continuance of the private banking system is not an immediate menace to Australia's financial and economic welfare, or to its general prosperity. He admitted that the private banks rendered great assistance during the war and since in helping to overcome the many problems which confronted us in that period. He said - </para>
<quote>
<para>During the war and since its conclusion, (lit! Australian economy has been kept more stable than any economy of any country in the world. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">That is a very great tribute to the private banking system of this country. The Government has given no valid reason for its refusal to comply with the demand by a large section of the people that this issue be submitted at a referendum before this measure is brought into operation. However, despite the wishes of the people mid the fact that no urgency exists for this legislation, the Government is determined to put it through as quickly as possible. The measure is most farreaching. It affects directly, or indirectly, the future of every citizen of this country. It will create a financial monopoly which will be able to grant, or withhold, advances to nil and sundry. Oan such a proposal be for the good of the greatest number? In our enlightened agc, with healthy competition in business, no undertaking can be carried on without financial backing. The time comes when those in control of any business find it necessary to obtain financial accommodation in order to tide a business over a difficult period, or for expan sion or the purchase of raw materials which, very often, have to be -purchased in advance. Adequate finance is also the first requisite for the establishment of new enterprises. Bearing those facts in mind, we must ask ourselves whether a monopoly bank will be capable of meeting all the requirements involved in carrying on successfully the business of this country in the future. We find that a monopoly bank will be able to exercise, through its control of finance, dictatorial powers over all productive and industrial undertakings. This is the greatest step towards complete nationalization that has been taken in the 47 years that have elapsed since federation. People are asking why the Government should introduce such a revolutionary measure at the present time. The answer is that the stage is now set to implement Labour's platform of the " socialization of the means' of production, distribution and exchange ". I remind honorable senators that the Government has another two years to run before it faces the electors. The recent census taken of the population of this country reveals that there has been an increase of population in some States, which will, in consequence, entitle them to representation in the House of Representatives by additional .members of Parliament. This will result in a redistribution of seats, and it is expected that any redistribution which the Government makes will be based upon its appreciation of the way in which certain bodies of electors have voted in the past.. It is also rumoured that there is to be an increase of the numbers of members of Parliament, with a corresponding increase of the number of honorable senators. Should that take place, there will undoubtedly he a complete redistribution of parliamentary seats throughout Australia. As every one knows, a redistribution of seats affords an opportunity to create seats which may favour the political party in power at the time redistribution is made. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2335</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">AMOUR, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Senator Amour</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Leader of the Opposition must have learned something from the recent Victorian elections. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2335</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>- No, but I did learn something from the last State elections in Queensland, which resulted in the return to office of the Australian </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para class="block">Labour party, although its members received only 44 per cent, of the votes. As i say, any redistribution of seats made by the party in power at the time will undoubtedly be intended to confer some advantage upon it. What more auspicious time could be selected for the introduction of a piece of legislation against which the country has manifested such hostility? The introduction of such a measure at the present time is no mere accident; the Government has taken stock of the position and has determined to take advantage of the present circumstances to force upon the country its proposal for the nationalization of banks. I maintain that the people must realize that they have to fight against a well organized section of the community, which has prepared complete plans for the overthrow of their democratic way of life in order to substitute a completely socialized order. Honorable senators opposite may contend that that is a bold assertion to make, but I shall proceed to justify it. </para>
<para>Official reports show that preparations to achieve the socialization of Australia have been under way since the AllAustralian Trade Union Conference held in 1921. That conference resolved unanimously on the following steps : - 1, The destruction of the craft unions and their replacement by industrial unions. </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="2.">
<para>The nationalization of banking and ot principal industries. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">It has required 26 years for the opportunity to present itself to implement that decision. That is why I say that the present circumstances are ideal, from the point of view of honorable senators opposite, for the introduction of the present proposal. The conference which I have mentioned also resolved to secure - </para>
<quote>
<para>The introduction of control of nationalized industries by boards consisting of representatives of the workers and the community. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">This has already taken place. To-day we have the Joint Coal Board, the Stevedoring Industry Commission and many other boards and commissions constituted to control primary production. The conference also resolved to seek - </para>
<quote>
<para>The establishment of an elective supreme council by nationalized industry to take the place of Parliament. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">The first steps of the plan are now nearing; completion. Craft unions have been abolished in the main industries and their places have been taken by huge industrial unions. Every one knows that the majority of the leaders of the big industrial unions are members of the central committee of the Communist party. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2336</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXE</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NASH, Richard</name>
<name role="display">Senator Nash</name>
</talker>
<para>- Tell us the trade unions concerned. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2336</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />