/
19501109_senate_19_210.xml
2256 lines (2256 loc) · 272 KB
/
19501109_senate_19_210.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1950-11-09</date>
<parliament.no>19</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>2</period.no>
<chamber>SENATE</chamber>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">Senate. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1950-11-09</day.start>
<para>The PRESIDENT <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator the Hon. Gordon Brown)</inline> took the chair at 11 a.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS</title>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JSB</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CRITCHLEY, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator CRITCHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Oan the Minister for Trade and Customs say whether the attention of the Government has been drawn to the frequency of serious industrial accidents to New Australians and the large number of fatalities Among those people during the last year? If the proportion of accidents is greater than that experienced by Australians in industry, will the Government cause inquiries to be made as to the reasons for those accidents, and take the necessary steps to remove the causes? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZI</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Trade and Customs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'SULLIVAN, Neil</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'SULLIVAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- So far as I am aware, the details referred to by the honorable senator have not been brought to the notice of the Government. It is most unlikely that they would be, because the legislation and regulations dealing with the safety precautions taken in factories, workshops and plants are essentially matters within the province of State government?. Earn State ha? its own legislation providing precautions te be taken for the safety of employees. I do not know what action the Australian </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Government can take, but I agree thai it is a matter that should be brought t<> the notice of the appropriate State authorities. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>LORD HOWE ISLAND</title>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQH</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LARGE, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator LARGE</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the 5th October I asked the Minister representing the Minister for Civil Aviation whether he would give serious consideration to the desires of residents of Lord Howe Island for the supply of electric power- </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRESIDENT, The</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT</name>
</talker>
<para>- -Order ! I am informed that that question appears- upon the notice-paper. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LARGE, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator LARGE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am asking why ii has not been answered. Will the Minuter for Trade and Customs cause an investigation to be made to ascertain the reason why I have not received h reply to my question? It could have been answered simply in the affirmative or negative. Two weeks ago, I inquired why I had not received a reply to it. J have not yet received a reply, but yesterday a note was handed to mc. It reads a.follows : - </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<quote>
<para class="block">The mutter i» not one for the Commonwealth Government. Primarily, a New Smith Wales Government responsibility. <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Casey</inline> is having inquiries mode through his department in an endeavour to provide the senator with as much information as possible. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">The position is most unsatisfactory. In the question on the notice-paper- </para>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRESIDENT, The</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT</name>
</talker>
<para>- Order ! </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LARGE, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator LARGE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall be brief. 1 am not throwing stones at any one. The question standing upon the notice-paper in my name is directed to the Minister representing the Minister for Works and Housing, but I did not direct it to him. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZI</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'SULLIVAN, Neil</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'SULLIVAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is true that many questions asked by honorable senators could be answered simply by the words " Yes " or " No ", but this Government desires to give the fullest possible information in answers to questions placed upon the notice-paper if the questions warrant that course being taken. The Minister for Social Services has something to say about thi* matter. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2135</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7A</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Social Services</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPOONER, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator SPOONER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The question on the notice-paper to which <inline font-weight="bold">Senator</inline> Large has referred is directed to me, as the Minister representing the Minister for </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Works and Housing. As the question had been upon the notice-paper for some time, I endeavoured to expedite a reply to it. The- note that <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Large</inline> read was one written to me by my secretary. As a matter of courtesy, I gave it to the honorable senator in order that he should know the reason for the delay in replying to his question. I did not expect that it would be used in evidence against me. This is a tangled skein. <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Large</inline> has said that he addressed his question to the Minister representing the Minister for Civil Aviation, but I do not see what the subject-matter of the question has to do with the Minister for Civil Aviation. According to the notice-paper, the question is addressed to the Minister representing the Minister for Works and Housing. The Minister for Works and Housing made inquiries and ascertained that the matter raised by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Large</inline> had nothing to do with him and was the responsibility of the New South Wales Government. He, I think very courteously, said to me, " This matter has nothing to do with my department, but I shall find out what I can about it and write a letter to <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Large</inline> telling him what I have ascertained ". That is the appropriate way in which to deal with the matter. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2136</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>POWDERED MILK</title>
<page.no>2136</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUA</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>UAP; LP from 1944</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLEAY, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLEAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the 18th October, <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Robertson</inline> asked a question relating to the export of powdered milk. The figures that she gave in respect of the export of dried full-cream milk were correct. The Government is aware that there have been shortages of powdered milk in some outlying areas of northern and central Queensland and of Western Australia. The reply given by me, as Acting Minister for Commerce and Agriculture, to <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Annabelle</inline> Rankin on the 12th October, 1950, explained the Government's position in the matter. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2136</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>RICE</title>
<page.no>2136</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUA</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Fuel, Shipping and Transport</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLEAY, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLEAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the 31st October, <inline font-weight="bold">Senator O'Byrne</inline> asked me a question concerning the supply of rice to Tasmania. I am now able to inform the honorable senator that the distribution of rice to the Australian public is arranged by the trade. TheGovernment has no control over the distribution arrangements. Merchants have agreed to proceed with the distribution of rice in all States, to ensure that members of the public, in addition toinvalids, shall be able to procure rice supplies in the ordinary way from grocers. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2136</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>COMMONWEALTH BANK</title>
<page.no>2136</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KPC</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KATZ, Frederick</name>
<name role="display">Senator KATZ</name>
</talker>
<para>- When answering a question in another place yesterday, the Prime Minister stated that a political alliance with the Opposition was needed in order to overcome production problems in Australia. I ask the Minister for Trade and Customs whether, if it is necessary to have co-operation in the realm of production, is it not equally necessary for the Government to co-operate with the Opposition by appointing members of the Government to the proposed select committee to inquire into the functions of the Commonwealth Sank? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZI</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'SULLIVAN, Neil</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'SULLIVAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am sure that all honorable senators agree that we owe- an obligation to the country to pull together in the common interest, where that is at all practicable. That is highly desirable in all instances. But I do not know what that co-operation has to do with the Commonwealth Bank. Of -the ten members of the proposed Commonwealth Bank Board, eight have been already indicated. I do not know who the other two will be. However, I am sure that the Prime Minister and members of the Cabinet will exercise their usual discretion in connexion with those appointments. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2136</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KPC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KATZ, Frederick</name>
<name role="display">Senator KATZ</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Minister for Trade and Customs has sought to sidetrack my question. I referred to the proposal of the Opposition to appoint a select committee in connexion with the banking legislation that is now before this chamber. I asked the Minister whether the Government was prepared to co-operate in that connexion by appointing Government members to that committee, in view of the fact that the Government had sought the co-operation of the Opposition to overcome production problems in Australia. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZI</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'SULLIVAN, Neil</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'SULLIVAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I think that members of the Opposition are under some misapprehension. "We did not seek the co-operation of the Opposition for our own advantage, and the withholding of it does not hurt us. We sought their co-operation in the interests of the country, not in our interests as a Government or a party. I believe that mo9t members of the Opposition would be prepared to give their co-operation on those terms. It has been established during the very dreary debate on the Commonwealth Bank Bill that the only real objection of the Opposition is to the appointment of a board to control the Commonwealth Bank. It seems to me that the proposal to refer the bill to a select committee of the Senate lacks the stamp of sincerity. The bill first came before the Parliament several months ago. The proposal to refer it to a select committee <inline font-style="italic">is</inline> a ruse to enable the Opposition to avoid the responsibility of rejecting the bill, failing to pass it, or of passing it with unacceptable amendments. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6P</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BROWN, Gordon</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT (Senator the Hon Gordon Brown</name>
</talker>
<para>- Discussion of these matters might well be left until the bill itself is before the Senate. It is not right that they should be discussed during question time. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TELEPHONE SERVICES</title>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZH</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">AMOUR, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Senator AMOUR</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister representing the Postmaster-General inform the Senate whether he has received a petition from telephone subscribers connected with the manual exchange at Black Mountain, in New South Wales, asking for the provision of a continuous telephone service ? If it is not practicable to provide the service sought, will steps be taken to establish a rural automatic telephone exchange at Black Mountain? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role>Minister for Repatriation</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall bring the honorable senator's question to the notice of the Postmaster-General and ask to be" supplied with an answer at an early date. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KBC</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WILLESEE, Don</name>
<name role="display">Senator WILLESEE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister representing the Postmaster-General inform the 'Senate whether the formula applied by the Postmaster-General's Department to the raising of non-official post offices to official status has revealed that the non-official post office at Hawthorn West, in Victoria, should be raised to official status? Is it a fact that the Postmaster-General has overruled the departmental recommendation, and restricted that post office to non-official status? Does the Government intend to alter the formula that was applied by the former Labour Government? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable senator's question involves departmental policy. I shall bring it to the notice of the Postmaster-General and seek a reply at an early date. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TELEVISION</title>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K4S</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SANDFORD, Charles Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator SANDFORD</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister representing the PostmasterGeneral inform the Senate whether it is the intention of the Government to erect experimental television stations in Australia, and, if so, the progress that has been made in this connexion? If the Government does not intend to erect such experimental stations, will he state the reason? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable senator's question involves departmental policy. I shall bring it to the notice of the Postmaster-General and request a reply for the honorable senator at an early date. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MILK</title>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6W</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Can the Minister representing the Minister for Health Bay whether any progress has been made with the scheme for the distribution of free milk to school children, or has it been discarded as unworkable? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2137</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Government does not intend to discard the scheme for the distribution of free milk for school children. The Minister for Health has approached the State governments separately to arrange for their co-operation in the distribution of milk. I cannot say what stage the negotiations have reached, but I understand that one of the larger States is prepared to co-operate, and that the distribution of milk will begin at an early date. The honorable senator will understand that there are certain physical difficulties connected wtih the distribution of milk in large, thinly populated areas. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KBW</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>LP; IND from June 1978</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WRIGHT, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator WRIGHT</name>
</talker>
<para>- After the last conference of Commonwealth and State Ministers it was reported in the press that the Premier of Tasmania had said that he would not co-operate in the Commonwealth scheme for the distribution of free milk to school children. The Premier was also reported to have said that there were no butter factories in southern Tasmania that could absorb the excess supplies of milk that would be available during school holidays and at weekends. Has the Minister representing the Minister for Health been advised of any change of the Premier's views on either of those matters ? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not received any intimation that the Premier of Tasmania has changed the opinions that he is reported to have expressed. However, I shall bring the honorable senator's question to the notice of the Minister for Health and obtain a considered reply. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES</title>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0N</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ARNOLD, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator ARNOLD</name>
</talker>
<para>- In view of the fact that the present Government has been in office for nearly twelve months without any clear statement having been made about its national health policy, will the Minister representing the Minister for Health give an assurance that, before the end of the present sessional period, a statement of Government policy on this matter will be made? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>- As I am not the Minister for Health but only his representative in this chamber, I am unable to give the honorable senator the assurance that he seeks. However, I shall ask the Minister for Health whether he can provide me with a statement in order that T may make it in the chamber. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BROKEN HILL PROPRIETARY COMPANY LIMITED</title>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYA</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'BYRNE, Justin</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'BYRNE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for Trade and Customs whether it is a fact that the Prime Minister, speaking in Adelaide prior to the 1949 elections, stated that if any monopoly organization could be shown to him to be exploiting the people, he would not hesitate to nationalize that industry? Has the </para>
</talk.start>
<para>Minister seen a copy of the New York publication <inline font-style="italic">Fortune</inline> of November of thisyear, which shows that the Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited, which, with its subsidiaries, has made very large profits, has been guilty of not trying toincrease production, and has been "limping along on 70 per cent, capacity " <inline font-style="italic">l</inline> Will the Minister accept that as evidence that this monopoly organization is exploit ing the Australian people, and take the steps foreshadowed by the Prime Minister in the speech to which -I have referred ? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZI</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'SULLIVAN, Neil</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'SULLIVAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The various speeches made by the Prime Minister are undoubtedly noteworthy but I do not carry details of them in my mind. However, if the right honorable gentleman did say in Adelaide that, if returned to power, he would take drastic action against any monopoly that was exploiting the public, that would be in accordance with his general attitude. I have read in the newspapers, and learned from conversations that, tragically for this country, the Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited is operating only to about 70 per cent, of its capacity. That, however, is not due to any lack of desire on the part of the company, but to the shortage n coal. I know that the management of the company takes a. serious view of the fact that this country is suffering because the capacity of the organization is not being fully used. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PAPUA AND NEW GUINEA</title>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'BYRNE, Justin</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'BYRNE</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister acting for the Minister for External Territories, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>What is the policy of the Government regarding the development of the natural resources of Papua and New Guinea, particularly the Mekeo rice areas, and the Bulolo timber area ? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Will the Acting Minister investigate the complaint that an undue period of time of up to nine months elapses between the lodgment of an application for the lease of a timber area mid the granting of the application? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2138</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6Z</name.id>
<electorate>through Senator O'SULLIVAN </electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Attorney-General</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPICER, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator SPICER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The acting for the Minister for External Territories has supplied the following answers : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>It is the announced policy of the Government to develop the resources of the territory to the fullest extent and as speedily as possible. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">Particular attention is being given to the question of rice cultivation in the territory and hu experimental station covering 2,000 acres has been established at Bereina, about 60 miles from Port Moresby. </para>
<para>Timber from the Bulolo Valley is being used for reconstruction needs in the territory and recently authority was given for export from the territory of Klinkii pine in flitches suitable for the manufacture of battery separators. The manner in which the main pine stand in the Bulolo Valley will be developed is at present receiving the attention of the Government. </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="2.">
<para>If the honorable senator will furnish me with particulars of the complaint an immediate investigation will be made. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2139</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>POSTAL DEPARTMENT</title>
<page.no>2139</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1T</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BENN, Archibald</name>
<name role="display">Senator BENN</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Postmaster-General, <inline font-style="italic">upon</inline> notice - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1">
<para>. Is it a fact that the Postmaster-General's Department does not fill vacancies caused by resignations of men engaged in the line section ? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>If so, (a) does the Postmaster-Geners.1, by this method, intend to eventually to achieve a 20 per cent, reduction of staff; and (6) does he consider that by this action the efficiency nf his department will be impaired and the public prevented from availing themselves of a satisfactory telephonic service? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The PostmasterGeneral has supplied the following information: - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>While there are fluctuations in the number of men employed in individual localities for varying reasons the lines staff as a whole was increased by approximately 350 during the first three months of the current financial year. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>There has been no overall decline in the lines staff which will be maintained at the maximum strength possible consistent with the availability of materials. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2139</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>LIQUID FUEL</title>
<page.no>2139</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para class="block">
<inline font-weight="bold">Senator- McCALLUM</inline>asked the Minister for Fuel, Shipping and Transport, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
<quote>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>In view of the serious overseas and» international position, will the Minister state whether adequate stocks of petroleum products are being maintained at seaboard terminals throughout the Commonwealth; also whether adequate reserve stocks of lubricating oils arc being maintained at a sufficiently high level to meet increased consumption necessitated by defence, transport and industrial requirements? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Will he state whether future imports of petroleum products from dollar areas are likely to bc curtailed or affected in any way as l he result of the dollar loan recently nego tiated by the Prime Minister, particularly in view of the recurring annual interest charges which have to be met? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Has there been any substantial increase in the consumption of petrol and other petroleum products since the lifting of petrol rationing, ami to what extent have the sales of petrol and kerosene increased during the last eight months of this year, compared with the corresponding period of 1949? </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>Will he furnish a return showing the total sales by States throughout Australia of lighting kerosene, power kerosene, motor spirit, distillate and fuel oils for each month, January to August, inclusive, compared with the corresponding months of last year? </para>
</item>
</list>
</quote>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2139</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KUA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCLEAY, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator McLEAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable senator's questions are as follows : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Stocks of petroleum products, including lubricating oils, are being maintained at seaboard and other terminals throughout Australia at a level adequate to meet the requirements of defence, transport and industry. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Future imports of petroleum products will not be curtailed or affected in any way as a result of the dollar loan recently negotiated. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>The percentage increase in sales during the first eight months of 1950 compared with the corresponding period of 1949 was - </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">
<graphic href="210332195011094_4_0.jpg" />
</para>
<para class="block">In the case of diesel oil there was a decrease of 5.23 per cent. </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="4.">
<para>The information available to my department relates to oil company State marketing areas, which are not necessarily defined by State boundaries. I am therefore unable to furnish the information in the form requested by the honorable senator. However, the following figures indicate the total Australian sales of the products as mentioned for the first eight months of 1949 compared with the first eight months of 1950 : - </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">
<graphic href="210332195011094_4_1.jpg" />
</para>
<para class="block">
<graphic href="210332195011094_5_2.jpg" />
</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>STATES GRANTS (ADDITIONAL TAX REIMBURSEMENT) BILL 1950</title>
<page.no>2140</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Bill received from the House of Representatives. </para>
<para>Standing Orders suspended. </para>
<para>Bill (on motion by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator SPOONER)</inline> read a first time. </para>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Second Reading</title>
<page.no>2140</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2140</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7A</name.id>
<electorate>New South "Wales</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Social Services</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPOONER, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator SPOONER</name>
</talker>
<para>.. - I move - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para class="block">That the bill be now read a second time. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">The purpose of this bill is to authorize the payment to the States in 1950-51 of an additional tax reimbursement grant of £5,000,000. Under the formula laid down in the States Grants (Tax Reimbursement) Act 1946-48 it is estimated that the tax reimbursement grant to the States in 1950-51 will amount to £70,393,000 or £7,856,000 more than last year. As a consequence of this bill, therefore, the total tax reimbursement grants to the States will be increased by £12,856,000 this year. </para>
<para>At the recent conference of Commonwealth and State Ministers the Premiers indicated that they expected serious budget difficulties .this year as a result of rising costs on State expenditures, and suggested that the tax reimbursement formula should be amended. This formula was laid down in the legislation pased in 1946, and it provides that the aggregate tax reimbursement grant be varied each year in accordance with variations in the populations of the States and with increases in the level of average wages. The formula was amended in 1947 and again in 1948. The general effect of the 1948 amendment was to increase the grant for 1948-49 by £8,740,000 whilst this year the formula will result in the States receiving about £19,000,000 more than they would have received under the 1946 formula. In the five years since 1946-47 the grant will have increased from £40,000,000 to over £70,000,000- an increase of more than 75 per cent. </para>
<para>After considering all the circumstances, including the present and prospective financial commitments of the Commonwealth, the Premiers were informed that the Commonwealth could not agree to amend the formula but that as a special measure this year it would supplement the amount payable under the present act by an additional grant of £5,000,000 in 1950- 51. At the same time, the Commonwealth suggested that a complete review be made of the financial relations between the </para>
<para class="block">Commonwealth and the States. The Premiers agreed to participate in such a. review and a special conference of Commonwealth and State Ministers will be convened by the Commonwealth for this; purpose. </para>
<para>The bill provides that the grant of £5,000,000 will be distributed among the States in the same proportions as the grant payable under the States Grants (Tax Reimbursement) Act 1946-48 is distributed in 1950-51. The precise amount which each State will receive this year under the legislation will not be known until the Commonwealth Statistician has completed the calculations which he is required to perform under legislation. Preliminary estimates furnished by the Commonwealth Statistician, however, indicate that the share of each State in the additional grant of £5,000,000 will be approximately as follows: - </para>
<para class="block">
<graphic href="210332195011094_6_3.jpg" />
</para>
<para class="block">I commend the bill to honorable senators. </para>
<para>Debate (on motion by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Ashley/)</inline> adjourned. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>STATES GRANTS RILL 1950</title>
<page.no>2141</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Second Reading</title>
<page.no>2141</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Debate resumed from the 8th November <inline font-style="italic">(vide</inline> page 2058), on motion by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Spooner</inline> - </para>
<quote>
<para>That the bill be now read a second time. </para>
</quote>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2141</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0W</name.id>
<electorate>New South Wales</electorate>
<party />
<role>Leader of the Opposition</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ASHLEY, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator ASHLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>[11.38 J. - This bill provides for the payment of special grants of £12,175,000 to the States of South Australia, Western Australia and Tasmania, during the current financial year. The grant in 1948-49 was £7,450,000. I wish to draw a comparison between the 1948-49 figure and the amount of £12,175,000 that has been provided for distribution during the current financial year, because I suggest that that indicates the inflationary trend being experienced in all the States. The necessity for increased grants to the various States in this financial year is due, in my opinion, to the abolition of prices control in 1948. I do not say that the increase of those grants has resulted from the assumption of office by the present Government, but the rise from £7,450,000 in 1948 to £12,175,000 to-day is a significant one; nor do I suggest that this Government is responsible for the abolition of prices control, because that was done as the result of a decision by the people of Australia. However, many members of the Government, including the Prime Minister <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Menzies)</inline> and the Treasurer <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr, Fadden),</inline> must accept some responsibility for influencing the people of Australia to make that decision, and the consequent defeat of the prices control referendum. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>The figures for 1948-49 and for 1950-51 show very little variation as far as the allowances to the claimant States are concerned. Doubtless the Government will claim that the increases which have such an inflationary effect are due to the effect of the 40-hour week and a lack of production. </para>
<para>The continued increase of prices in this country poses a problem, not only to this Government but also to the State governments, irrespective of their political colour. At the conference of Commonwealth and State Ministers held in August, the State Premiers claimed that it was almost impossible for them to balance their State budgets and that they were placed in an intolerable position. The Ministers now present in the chamber who attended that conference know of the protests that were made then by the State Premiers. Liberal and Labour Premiers made common cause in complaining that the Commonwealth had failed to provide the States with the financial resources necessary to enable them to perform their functions efficiently. The Premiers stated that this Government by using its financial powers, was whittling away the authority of the States and making them vassals of the Commonwealth. That was a very serious accusation, and I hope that the Minister in charge of the bill will reply to it. According to press reports, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. McGirr</inline> said after the conference - </para>
<quote>
<para>It is very doubtful whether the present Federal Government, on its showing at the Premiers' Conference, is prepared to pay more than lip service to the principle of federal government. The objective seems to be not only to strangle the States financially but to discredit them by forcing them to restrict services and curtail their plans for development. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">That was a serious charge. I agree that the States usually ask for more money than they actually require because they know that their claims will be pruned by the Commonwealth Treasurer, but on this occasion, although the States claimed the very large additional sum of ?25,000,000, this Government has made provision to pay only ?5,000,000 in respect of that claim. That requires some explanation. When reference is made in this chamber to price rises generally in Australia, the Government invariably says that the reason for the increases is lack of production. If the Government wants production in this country to be increased, it must adopt a more co-opera tive and tolerant attitude to the States. </para>
<para>I have not yet seen the official report of the proceedings of the conference to which I have referred, and the observations that I have made are based upon what I have read in the press. Apparently the Premiers were unanimous in their complaints, as the following extract from a report published in the <inline font-style="italic">Sydney Morning Herald</inline> of the 7th September, shows - </para>
<quote>
<para>In the closing stages of the debate on taxation the Premiers summed up their impressions in this way: - </para>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. PLAYFORD.</inline>; Nearly every conference I come to puts another nail into "the coffin of the States. This one is no exception. </para>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. HANLON.</inline>; I wish to make an emphatic protest against the way in which my submissions have not been considered. </para>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. MCDONALD.</inline>It is a deplorable position. The people of Victoria have been submitted to a great indignity at this conference. </para>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr.</inline>McGIRR ; I join in the protest, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Prime</inline> Minister. The right thing for th? Federal Government to do is to take a vote of the people to see whether they want State governments. " What is happening here will destroy the State Governments by a process of strangulation. I object very strenuously and suggest you submit a referendum to the people rathe than do the work you are going on with here " </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">Further evidence of the unanimity of opinion on this matter among State politicians is provided by the following extract from ari article published in th, </para>
<para class="block">
<inline font-style="italic">Sydney Morning Herald</inline>of the 8th September : - </para>
<quote>
<para>The problem of Commonwealth-State financial relationships was " over -ripe for settlement ", the Leader of the Opposition, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr V.</inline> H. Treatt, said yesterday. </para>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Treatt</inline>said the loss of State sovereignty included a High Court decision to give thu Commonwealth first " cut " of income tax. " It is gratifying to note that the New South Wales Premier, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. McGirr,</inline> has made his annual protest about the allocations to the States, but on the other hand it is regrettable that this occurs only once a year ", he said </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">There is a general complaint about the allocation of revenues by the Commonwealth to the States. </para>
<para>I understand that one of the grounds upon which the States based their claim for increased allocations was that they wished to provide greater educational facilities in this country. That is a very important matter. This Parliament has an obligation imposed upon it in relation to the education of the Australian people, and any failure of the Government to make funds available for educational purposes should not be countenanced by honorable senators opposite, let alone by members of the Opposition. I shall listen with interest to the Minister's reply to this debate and I hope that a satisfactory explanation of the Government's actions will be given. In the dark days which, according to the Government, lie ahead, we shall need to be tolerant and co-operative in order that we may work together for the benefit of the Australian people. That remark applies, not only to the members of this Parliament but also to the Commonwealth in its relation; with the States. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2142</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KBW</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>LP; IND from June 1978</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WRIGHT, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator WRIGHT</name>
</talker>
<para>. - The measure before the chamber provides honorable senators with an opportunity to consider the subject of Commonwealth-State financial relations. It provides for the exercise of power under sections 96 of the Constitution, which enables the Australian Parliament to vote financial assistance to the three claimant States. The Leader of the Opposition <inline font-weight="bold">(Senator Ashley)</inline> devoted the first part of his speech to propaganda about the inflationary trend that has developed in this country during the last two or three years. It is interesting to recall that between 1909 and 3920 the value of the original <inline font-style="italic">per capita</inline> payment of 25s. to the States declined considerably. By 1920 the value of that payment was no more than 12s. That decline of value was probably attributable to the inflationary trend that followed the termination of "World War I. It is significant to note from the third report of the Commonwealth Grants Commission that the gradual decline of the value of the £1 was maintained until the next decade, when the system of <inline font-style="italic">per capita</inline> payments to the claimant States was replaced by a financial agreement. I commend to the Leader of the Opposition the first paragraph of the Seventeenth Report of the Commonwealth Grants Commission that has just been published, in order that he may correct his initial views on this subject. A perusal of the report convinces one that the Australian economic position is germane to the present debate. Paragraph 12 of that report reads - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="lowerroman-dotted">
<item label=".">
<para>. This fall in the real value of money disturbed every aspect of incomes, from wages to government revenues. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">That comment relates not to the period since this Government took office, but to the period when the Leader of the Opposition waa a member of the Cabinet in the former Government in 1948-49. The paragraph continues - </para>
<quote>
<para>The industrial picture was also radically affected. The supply of many types of consumer goods increased by reason of higher imports and greater home production; hut the supply of all types of essential goods, materials and services such as coal, steel, building materials, houses and power continued to be seriously short of higher levels of demand. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">Then the following poignant observation : - </para>