/
19620313_senate_24_s21.xml
3478 lines (3478 loc) · 242 KB
/
19620313_senate_24_s21.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1962-03-13</date>
<parliament.no>24</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>1</period.no>
<chamber>SENATE</chamber>
<page.no>441</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<business.start>
<day.start>1962-03-13</day.start>
<para>The <inline font-weight="bold">PRESIDENT (Senator the Hon. Sir Alister McMullin)</inline> took the chair at 3 p.m.. and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>441</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>POLIOMYELITIS</title>
<page.no>441</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>441</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYA</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'BYRNE, Justin</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'BYRNE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Minister for Health seen a report in the Melbourne Herald " of 10th March headed " A SetBack in Polio Battle "? That report stated - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>The polio campaign, until now almost miraculously effective, is facing a set-back. Queensland and Canberra health authorities are disturbed and are trying to plug this breach in the immunisation shield. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">An article in this morning's issue of the Sydney " Daily Telegraph " says that eleven new cases of poliomyelitis were reported yesterday, bringing the New South Wales total for the year to 171. Has the Minister seen a report of a statement by the British Minister of Health announcing the end of the manufacture and use of the Salk poliomyelitis vaccine and the introduction of the Sabin oral vaccine, which is considered more effective in the prevention of poliomyelitis than is the Salk vaccine? Has the Minister perused the report of the British joint committee on poliomyelitis vaccine headed by Lord Cohen of Birkenhead, which directed attention to the fact that Russia, Poland, East Germany and other countries had achieved nation-wide immunity and that last year in West Berlin and West Germany, where Salk vaccine was being used, several hundred cases of poliomyelitis were treated clinically, whereas, in the same period, not one case was treated in East Berlin or East Germany, where the Sabin vaccine was used universally? In view of the fact that the Sabin vaccine takes nine months to make and test for safety and potency, will the Minister inform the Senate whether immediate plans are being made for the Sabin oral poliomyelitis vaccine to be introduced into this country as speedily as possible? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>441</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KAF</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role>Minister for Health</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WADE, Harrie</name>
<name role="display">Senator WADE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have seen the reports to which the honorable senator has referred. Before I answer his questions specifically, may I make two points. First, the standard of the Salk vaccine that we manufacture in Australia is recognized by all authorities on this matter to be the highest in the world. Secondly, we are fortunate at the present time to have ample supplies of the vaccine to cover the needs of the States. I emphasize the fact that we have ample supplies because so many people remain without protection to-day and the State governments are urging people to take the precaution of being vaccinated. I believe that we all should lend our voices to the plea to people to take all the precautions they can against poliomyelitis by way of the Salk vaccine. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>Specifically answering the honorable senator's question, I say that my department is very interested in the Sabin vaccine. Recently it sent overseas one of its leading virologists, <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Duxbury,</inline> who has been making extensive inquiries in the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Russia and, in fact, all European countries where that vaccine has been used. At this stage, we have not yet had his report, though he has returned home. I am hope' ful that it will be available in the very near future. Until the report is available and has been examined by people who are in a position to consider it intelligently and constructively, I assure the Senate that my department will not depart from its Salk vaccine programme. We know that the Salk vaccine has been tried and proved. We know, also, that it takes a long time to produce the Sabin vaccine. I warn people who think they may wait for the Sabin vaccine to be available that the disease may strike in the meantime. I say to all and sundry, " If you have any doubts about where you stand in the matter, do not hesitate to avail yourself of the facilities that exist for immunization with the Salk vaccine as a protective measure ". </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>441</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>IRON ORE</title>
<page.no>441</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>441</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KAC</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">VINCENT, Victor</name>
<name role="display">Senator VINCENT</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question, which is addressed to the Minister for National Development, concerns the discovery of a great iron ore deposit in the district in Western Australia known as the Pilbara. I mention by way of preface that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Thomas</inline> M. Price, a vice-president of the Kaiser Steel Corporation, who was recently in Western Australia, has been reported as having said some interesting things about this enormous deposit. In the first place, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Price</inline> is reported to have said that the- Pilbara iron ore find was one pf the massive iron ore bodies in the world. Secondly, he said that the deposit might feasibly be worked by the use of atomic power. Thirdly, he said that it would be easy to work the deposit, but that most of the ore would need to be beneficiated by some process or other before it could be converted to pig iron. Would the Minister care to comment on those three observations made by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Price?</inline></para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>442</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7A</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for National Development</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPOONER, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator SPOONER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I saw the newspaper report referred to by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Vincent</inline> and read it with a good deal of interest. I read all the comments that I can about this iron ore deposit, first, because it is a discovery of great national importance, and secondly, because when I first made an announcement about it my veracity was challenged, lt was said that I was not accurate and not sincere in my comments on it. So,- I have watched it with care. I notice that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Price</inline> speaks of the deposit as being of fabulous proportions. He used some such adjective to describe it. The Premier of Western Australia has likened its discovery to the discovery of gold in that State. It is certainly one of the great mineral discoveries of this era, ranking with the discovery of bauxite, the discovery of coal at Kianga, in Queensland, and not far short, perhaps, of the discovery of oil. It is a tremendous deposit of iron ore. It causes me to reflect and say how little the people of Australia really know about the mineral potentialities of this country. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>Dealing with the particular points made by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Vincent,</inline> I read that this gentleman from overseas had spoken of the development' of the deposit by the use of atomic power. I cannot follow the logic of that statement, although I have no doubt that he knows what he is talking about. He is a member of a big organization. I prefer not to comment on this aspect. When I think of the use of atomic power for such purposes, I ask myself which would be the most economical power - thermal, hydro or atomic. I do not know what particular association there may be between atomic power and this particular deposit. This gentleman said there were untold millions of tons of iron ore there and that it required beneficiation. I think that has yet to be proved. The reports we are receiving state that a great deal of the deposit is highgrade iron ore. Opinions about it are related to the particular areas which are inspected. The deposit covers such a big area that there is quite a variation in the quality from place to place. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>442</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TAXATION</title>
<page.no>442</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>442</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K3W</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CANT, Hartley</name>
<name role="display">Senator CANT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister representing the Treasurer the following questions: Is the Treasurer aware of the disabilities that are suffered by the residents of Geraldton in Western Australia because of the high cost of living in that area? Did the Treasurer recently meet a representative of the residents of Geraldton? Did that representative request the Government to give the residents of Geraldton some relief by way of taxation allowance? Did the representative of the Geraldton residents request that Geraldton be included in zone B for taxation purposes? If so, has the Government given favorable consideration to the request? If it has, will the zone B allowance be deductible from incomes in the J 961-62 tax year? If not, will the residents of Geraldton be given taxation relief in the 1962-63 tax year? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>442</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZY</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Civil Aviation</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PALTRIDGE, Shane</name>
<name role="display">Senator PALTRIDGE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not know whether the Treasurer recently met a representative of the people of Geraldton who requested that Geraldton be included in zone B for taxation purposes. I should imagine that, if the Treasurer did in fact meet such a representative, he would indicate his decision in the first instance to that person. The most I can do is to ask the Treasurer whether he can make available any information to <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Cant,</inline> and I shall do that. The latter part of the question involves matters of policy which, of course, are announced when the Budget is presented. But if there is any information that could be made available to the honorable senator, I shall try to get it for him. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>442</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TASMANIAN SEA MONSTER</title>
<page.no>442</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>442</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KSN</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MARRIOTT, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator MARRIOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is addressed to the Minister in charge of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization. Has every appropriate officer of the C.S.I. R.O. been alerted to assist and advise the relevant Tasmanian </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">State government departments in their research into the origin of the large sea monster which has been washed ashore on one of the beaches of Tasmania's rugged west coast? What is the latest information that officers of the C.S.l.R.O. have about the origin and species of this monster? Will every opportunity be given to interested scientists throughout the world to examine photographs and portions of the flesh of the monster? Should Tasmania take any specific precautions to safeguard shipping or the fishing industry against similar sea monsters? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>443</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KH5</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for the Navy</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GORTON, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator GORTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I gather that the object which has been discovered on the Tasmanian beach has been there for approximately two years. It is that long since its existence first became known. It has just recently been visited by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Mollison,</inline> who at the time was working for the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization and who brought back a sample of its flesh. The flesh will be analysed in Australia and probably abroad. At the present time consultations are going on between officers of the C.S.l.R.O. in Tasmania and the Animals and Birds Protection Board, which is the Tasmanian authority under whose jurisdiction the monster comes. That is the situation in regard to investigation of the object. The scientists are very dubious whether it is anything other than a member of a known species, but probably analysis of the flesh will give a little more information about that. I should think there is little danger of an attack by similar objects on the inhabitants, or the fauna and flora, of Tasmania. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>443</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>WAR SERVICE HOMES</title>
<page.no>443</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>443</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6W</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLE, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator COLE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct a question to the Minister in charge of war service homes. Many returned servicemen have borrowed money to buy homes and are paying interest at rates that are high in comparison with the interest rate on loans from the War Service Homes Division. In many instances, they borrowed the money because of the delay by the division in granting loans or because the maximum loan was too low. Will the Government consider permitting these ex-servicemen to change over to war service homes loans, especially as the amounts they have borrowed are less than the maximum loan now allowable? Will the Minister also consider allowing ex-servicemen who are buying homes other than with war service homes advances, and who find that the homes do not meet their requirements because of increased families, to build or buy suitable homes with the aid of war service homes loans, and to sell the equity in the homes they are now buying? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>443</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7A</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPOONER, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator SPOONER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The general purpose of the war service homes legislation is to give to an ex-serviceman who does not have a home the opportunity to acquire one. It is not to create a fund to which exservicemen may look in order to finance the purchase of homes on terms more favorable than those on which they have already obtained loans. One has to consider the question against that background. Over the years there has been such a demand by ex-servicemen who have not previously received war service homes loans and who are without homes, that we have not been able to consider extending the benefit to those who already have homes. I should think that any government would hesitate before extending the activities of the War Service Homes Division over such a wide field as that suggested. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>443</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DARWIN AIRPORT</title>
<page.no>443</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>443</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYY</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'FLAHERTY, Sidney</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'FLAHERTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Leader of the Government in the Senate request the Prime Minister to 0all the Minister for Civil Aviation and the Minister for Air into conference immediately so that he may direct both Ministers on the policy, if any, of the Government in respect of the Darwin aerodrome, over the use of which, it appears, the heads of those two departments are slangwhanging each other? If the Prime Minister cannot advise them on the matter, will he use me as an arbitrator? </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">
<inline font-weight="bold">Senator SPOONER__</inline>Without hesitation, speaking for the Prime Minister, I can give <inline font-weight="bold">Senator O'Flaherty</inline> a prompt answer in the negative to his first question. I am certain that my colleagues are quite capable of resolving any difference of opinion that may arise. I can also give a prompt answer in the negative to the second question. We do not want to make confusion worse confounded by bringing <inline font-weight="bold">Senator O'Flaherty</inline> into the matter. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>444</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TIES</title>
<page.no>444</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>444</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXR</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DRAKE-BROCKMAN, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Senator DRAKE-BROCKMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister representing the Minister for the Army: Is it a fact that the Army has placed an order for silk ties? Is it a fact also that the material for the ties is to be manufactured in England? Can the Minister inform the Senate how much silk is manufactured in this country? Does he not agree that wool has many virtues as a fibre? In view of the millions of pounds that are spent annually by the Government and Australian wool-growers on wool research and promotion, will the Minister inform the Senate of the reasons for the Army's decision? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>444</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Customs and Excise</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I was very interested to read in the newspapers that the Army Services Canteens Organization, in response to a request from officers and other ranks, had ordered ties for civilian wear. I noted that the ties were to be made of silk. I sought the advice of the Minister for the Army about this matter and he has informed me that, because of their design and motif, the ties cannot be made from material not as fine as silk. Wool would not be suitable for the purpose. I understand that it is planned eventually to have the ties made in Australia from imported raw silk. I think I have answered the matters raised by the honorable senator, but if there is still some aspect of the proposal on which he requires information 1 invite him to see me about it. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>444</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TOBACCO</title>
<page.no>444</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>444</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1T</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BENN, Archibald</name>
<name role="display">Senator BENN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Acting Minister for Trade aware of the results of the recent sales of this season's tobacco leaf al Mareeba in northern Queensland? Will the Minister comment on the price obtained for best quality leaf, compared with the price obtained in former years? Will the Minister comment also on the percentage of unsold leaf for which no bids were received? Can the Minister say whether the signs so far apparent in relation to sales are encouraging to the tobacco industry in Queensland? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>444</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Yes, I have noticed the results of sales of Mareeba leaf. It is interesting <inline font-style="italic">to</inline> note that the quality of leaf grown at Mareeba has improved considerably in the last few years. I pay a great tribute to the members of the growers' cooperative at Mareeba and to officers of the responsible State department, who have recognized that a market exists in Australia for good quality Australian-grown leaf. It is pleasing to note how the growing of good quality leaf has increased at Mareeba. Last year about 18 per cent, of all leaf grown in Australia was unsold. At the Mareeba sales the percentage of unsold leaf was about 12.6 per cent., which is a little higher than the percentage unsold at Mareeba last year. One reason for that is that portion of the Mareeba leaf offered for sale is not of the quality demanded by Australian manufacturers. The price for good quality Australian-grown leaf this year reached 192d. That is an excellent price. If my memory serves me correctly, the average price for Australian-grown leaf last year was 134d. The average price obtained at the recent Mareeba sales was 147d. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>I believe that the sales at Mareeba were partly influenced by the Government's announcement that manufacturers of cigarettes and tobacco would be required to use a minimum of 43 per cent. Australian leaf as from next season in order to qualify for rebate. That announcement was made prior to the recent sales and indicated to manufacturers how much Australian leaf they would need to purchase. The measures announced by the Government will lead to a long maturation period because manufacturers will be required to hold increased stocks. This factor, too, has given considerable impetus to the Mareeba sales. The principal reason, however, for the success of the sales is that the growers - the co-operative and all who work in the area - have, for some two or three years past, realized the value of growing quality leaf. They have set out to produce a quality product and I am sure they are now reaping their just rewards. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>444</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>AGRICULTURE</title>
<page.no>444</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>444</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KAW</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WEDGWOOD, Ivy</name>
<name role="display">Senator WEDGWOOD</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is directed to the Minister in charge of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization. Is it a fact that extensive surveys are being carried out by the organization in the north and northwest of Australia to ascertain the possibilities of establishing a permanent agricultural industry where one has never existed before? </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Will the Minister say how far those surveys have progressed? What are the prospects of economically sound crop production in those areas? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>445</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KH5</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GORTON, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator GORTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is a fact that the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, in conjunction with other authorities - though I think I can claim that the C.S.l.R.O. is playing a leading part -has carried out investigations and is carrying out investigations in, among other places, the north and north-west areas of Australia. The objects of the investigations referred to by the honorable senator are varied and include such things as studies of soil deficiencies to see what nutritive is required to be added to particular soils in particular places; studies qf grasses and herbage which would be suitable for climates in particular .places; studies of the best methods of grazing and managing such herbage, and things of that nature. It is too early yet to say -what the results of these investigations will be, but I think it can be said that encouraging results are being indicated by the surveys which the C.S.l.R.O. is carrying out. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>WHEAT</title>
<page.no>445</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<para class="block">
<inline font-weight="bold">Senator HENDRICKSON__</inline>I wish to direct a question without notice to the Minister representing the Minister for Primary Industry. It has been announced that the United Nations Wheat Conference has decided to raise the price range of wheat throughout the world by 12.5d. a bushel. If this decision is incorporated in the International Wheat Agreement, what obligation is there on wheat-importing countries to pay up to 202i cents a bushel, having in mind the fact that a few years ago the United Kingdom declined to pay 1.5 dollars for wheat although she was a signatory to the International Wheat Agreement? Does this conference decision mean that exporting countries are to make wheat available to lesser-developed nations to encourage increased wheat consumption in those countries? Does this mean that some of the large producing countries can give wheat away - a practice which has already seriously affected some of Australia's traditional markets? What countries, if any, have defaulted in their payments for the purchase of Australian wheat? </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>445</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KAF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WADE, Harrie</name>
<name role="display">Senator WADE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Those countries that are signatories to the International Wheat Agreement will of necessity honour their obligations under the agreement, and if they are either exporters or importers they will operate within the minimums and maximums nominated in the agreement. There is no provision in the agreement for making wheat available at cheaper rale. 5 to countries that are under-developed and in need of foodstuffs. That is a matter for individual governments. I am bound to say that in this regard the voice of the Australian Government has at last been heeded, on two counts. Our Minister for Trade has been declaring for years that the United Kingdom and other importing countries could not rightfully expect to buy cheap wheat from Australia. He has raised his voice on behalf of the Government to declare also that those who have plenty must devise ways and means of making wheat available at cheaper prices to those who are in need. Both counts reflect the leadership that Australia is giving to-day in world affairs. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>445</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CANBERRA</title>
<page.no>445</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>445</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOPER, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Senator Sir WALTER COOPER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I wish to ask the Minister representing the Minister for the Interior a question. Has the Minister's attention been directed to an article in to-day's " Canberra Times " headed " <inline font-weight="bold">Sir Mark</inline> Warns on City's Heritage"? <inline font-weight="bold">Sir Mark</inline> Oliphant was giving the Canberra Day Oration in the Albert Hall last night and said, among other things, that objectionable backyard industries in the garden city of Canberra could make industrial slums of some of its residential areas. If this is so, will the Minister inform the Senate what steps, if any, are being taken to ensure that city ordinances dealing with such matters can be enforced? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>445</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KAF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WADE, Harrie</name>
<name role="display">Senator WADE</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is refreshing to find busy men with great academic knowledge taking an interest in the development of Canberra. I am bound to say that on this occasion it could well be that the picture was somewhat over-coloured. Certainly, <inline font-weight="bold">Sir, there</inline> are few people in Canberra who would not deplore the practice to which <inline font-weight="bold">Sir Mark</inline> made reference. Each lease granted in Canberra contains a covenant which provides for the termination of the lease if the land to which it refers is used for purposes other than those stipulated in the lease. The Government, of course, is reluctant to take the drastic action of cancelling a lease because of a minor offence. I understand that at present it is examining the position to see whether the legislation governing leases or the leases themselves should be amended in order to enable the department to deal with infringements which do not warrant the drastic action of terminating leases. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>446</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BOOMERANGS</title>
<page.no>446</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>446</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7Y</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TANGNEY, Dorothy</name>
<name role="display">Senator TANGNEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question ls directed to the Acting Mnister for Trade. Is he aware of an announcement in an official bulletin issued recently by the Government of Ulster that a new industry is being developed there to make boomerangs for the Australian market? Is he aware also that an announcement was made in the week-end press that the United States of America intends to engage in the same type of manufacture? Is there any restriction on the entry of such articles to Australia? If not, then, in the interests of encouraging our. natives to perpetuate their native crafts, will the Minister see what action can be taken? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>446</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not seen the announcements to which the honorable senator refers. No doubt the Irish have a lot of experience in making weapons from wood. The shillelagh, perhaps- </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>446</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7Y</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TANGNEY, Dorothy</name>
<name role="display">Senator Tangney</name>
</talker>
<para>- This is northern Ireland. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>446</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I class the northern and southern Irish as one people; I make no distinction. I doubt whether the overseas manufacturers are gifted enough to be able to put into their boomerangs the power -to return, as the Australian aboriginal is able to do. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>446</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CANBERRA ARCHITECTURE</title>
<page.no>446</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>446</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KT8</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCCALLUM, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator MCCALLUM</name>
</talker>
<para>- I wish to ask a question of the Minister representing the Minister for the Interior. Has he noticed an article in to-day's issue of the " Canberra Times ", under the caption, " Cowsheds for Campbell ", accompanied by a perspective sketch of what purports to be some shops? Are the report and the sketch correct? If so, have the Minister, and possibly the members of the National Capital </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Development Commission, misunderstood a request I made some years ago that attention be paid to early colonial architecture? Dp they mistake for early colonial architecture, the architecture of the shops and shanties of 120 years ago? Have they seen the pictures by Hardy Wilson, in the corridors of this building, which show the early colonial architectural style? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>446</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KAF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WADE, Harrie</name>
<name role="display">Senator WADE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have seen the article referred to by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator McCallum.</inline> I find the reference to cowsheds to be most amusing. On many occasions I have seen radio sets installed in cowsheds for the purpose of soothing the troubled bovine breast, but I have never yet seen a glass front to a cowshed. If I do see one, I will say that nothing further remains to be seen. The National Capital Development Commission has followed the normal practice. It has invited an architect of repute to prepare plans and specifications of shop buildings required to meet the needs of a certain locality. I can only guess at what prompted the architect to design buildings of this type, but it could be that his purpose was to achieve harmony between residential and shopping areas. There could be many reasons why he chose this type of architecture. However, it will be within the province of those who tender for the construction work to suggest alterations of the plans, and any such suggestions will ' be considered on their merits. I understand that the sketch referred to is true and correct; it is official. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>446</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CANBERRA AND THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY</title>
<page.no>446</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>446</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JQN</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOKE, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator COOKE</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is directed also to the Minister representing the Minister for the Interior, although the Leader of the Government may wish to comment on it. I refer to remarks made by <inline font-weight="bold">Sir Mark</inline> Oliphant in addition to those already referred to by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Sir Walter</inline> Cooper. Is the Minister aware that <inline font-weight="bold">Sir Mark</inline> said that the rules governing tidiness are totally disregarded by the builders of houses and other small units? He added - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>Cement bags, luncheon papers, newspapers and packing materials blow along the streets, decorating verges and nature strips . . . Often one is ashamed to drive visitors along roads lined with rubbish of this kind - garden refuse dumped on the nature strips, or broken bottles and beer cans thrown from motor cars. </para>
<para>Much of this apathy arises from the feeling of impotence among Canberra's citizens. If they are civil servants, or are vulnerable in other ways, they know it does them personally no good to complain. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">We know that the conditions described by <inline font-weight="bold">Sir Mark</inline> Oliphant exist. In the circumstances, is the Government prepared to give the 36,000 to 40,000 citizens in Canberra the right that every citizen in a democracy should have, namely, to vote for a person to represent him in the Parliament, a person who, when elected, will have a deliberative vote on all matters and, therefore, will be able to vote for or against a government, as he decides? Such a right, if given to the citizens of Canberra, would remove the feeling of electoral impotence which they definitely suffer at present. I also ask the Minister representing the Minister for the Interior, or the Leader of the Government in the Senate, whether he will take immediate steps to see that Canberra does not continue to deteriorate as it has deteriorated over the last three or four years. Will he have these matters attended to immediately and, by regulation or other government action, ensure that the city of Canberra is kept in a tidy condition? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>447</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7A</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPOONER, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator SPOONER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall certainly convey to the residents of Canberra <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Cooke's</inline> suggestion that they should elect to Parliament a representative other than <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. J.</inline> R. Fraser. I think that is a very good suggestion indeed. In reply to the balance of the question, I say that beauty is always in the eye of the beholder. Perhaps <inline font-weight="bold">Sir Mark</inline> was not feeling his usual bright, smiling self when he made these comments. I do not believe that they represent the general view of the people who live in Canberra and the people who come to Canberra. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>447</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CIVIL AVIATION</title>
<page.no>447</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>447</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K2I</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRANSON, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator BRANSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Minister for Civil Aviation aware that a Western Australian newspaper report stated that international air traffic might enter and leave Australia via Perth instead of Darwin because of a dispute between the Department of Air and the Department of Civil Aviation? Also, is he aware that to-day's Adelaide "Advertiser" suggested that there was no foundation for that statement? Because of the importance to Western Australian people of any decision on this matter and because of the speculation arising from these press reports, will the Minister clarify the position and tell the Senate just what is the true state of affairs? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>447</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZY</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PALTRIDGE, Shane</name>
<name role="display">Senator PALTRIDGE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not seen either of the newspaper reports to which <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Branson</inline> has referred. The Darwin airport is one of the comparatively few airports in Australia to which both the Royal Australian Air Force and the Department of Civil Aviation have access and at which both have established facilities. Naturally, with that sort of arrangement there is sometimes a clash of interest. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>The position is that due to an increase in civil aviation traffic in recent times the Director-General of Civil Aviation, when questioned in Darwin recently by a representative of the local newspaper, acknowledged that as a result of the increase in traffic there were some deficiencies in the. civil aviation facilities provided for the public. As is the case in all joint-user projects, matters on which the users are at variance are settled by conference. The fact is that a conference between the two departments has been arranged. Indeed, it is taking place, I think, to-day. I have no doubt that the matters at issue, such as they are - I do not think they are very great - will be settled to' the satisfaction of both departments. </para>
<para>I should emphasize that at present there is no plan to over-fly Darwin or to alter in any way the existing traffic pattern. Certain operational requirements may well bring about one or two minor variations; but as yet there is no plan proposed that might lead to Darwin being eliminated from the Australian pattern. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>447</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>EUROPEAN COMMON MARKET</title>
<page.no>447</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>447</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KBW</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WRIGHT, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator WRIGHT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct a question to the Acting Minister for Trade. What is the latest information that the Government has received with regard to the stage reached in the negotiations between Great Britain and the members of the European Economic Community? Has a decision been made whether the Australian Minister for Trade will be given access to the conference table? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>447</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- This question is of very great importance, and I should like to obtain the latest information on the position for the honorable senator. I ask him to put his question on the notice-paper. I hope to have that information for him tomorrow. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>448</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TELEVISION</title>
<page.no>448</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>448</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KNR</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HANNAFORD, Douglas</name>
<name role="display">Senator HANNAFORD</name>
</talker>
<para>- I preface my question, which is directed to the Minister representing the Postmaster-General, by stating that last week statements outlining plans for the establishment of further television stations in capital cities, including Adelaide, emanated from the PostmasterGeneral. Some of my friends who live in the country areas of South Australia are disturbed lest the station in Adelaide should take priority over the establishment of country stations. Can the Minister give an assurance that the establishment of the proposed station in Adelaide, which I understand will be a commercial station, will not be given priority over the extension of television in country districts in South Australia? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>448</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KAF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WADE, Harrie</name>
<name role="display">Senator WADE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am very happy to give the honorable senator an assurance that the extension of commercial television in the capital cities will in no way affect the right of country areas to receive an adequate television service. As a matter of fact, phase four is reaching the stage when it will soon be possible for the PostmasterGeneral to call for applications for licences. In many cases sites have been selected. The proposal to permit third stations in the capital cities will not affect the extension of television to South Australian rural areas. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>448</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SNOWY MOUNTAINS SCHEME</title>
<page.no>448</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>448</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K5K</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCOTT, Malcolm</name>
<name role="display">Senator SCOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct a question to the Leader of the Government in the Senate. Is it a fact that the Government has become so economical in looking after the taxpayers' money, particularly in the last four years, that it has been able to save £9,000,000 on contracts which have been let by the Snowy Mountains Hydroelectric Authority for the ensuing four-year period? If that is so, will the Government consider the continual representations of Western Australian members of the Parliament and spend some of that £9,000,000 in developing the comprehensive water supply scheme in Western Australia, so that water may be made available to farmers in outback areas of that State who are greatly in need of it? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>448</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7A</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPOONER, William</name>
<name role="display">Senator SPOONER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I give <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Scott</inline> the soft answer that turneth away wrath, by saying that I do not think </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Western Australia has been badly treated by the Commonwealth Government. The reduction of expenditure in connexion with the Snowy Mountains scheme results from the receipt of tender prices lower than the estimates by the engineers of the cost of the work concerned. There has been a succession of contracts, all indicating very keen competition on the part of the tenderers. I visited the area during the week-end, and calculations that I made showed that over the next few years expenditure would amount to £9,000,000 less than was expected. So, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. President,</inline> there are perhaps pluses as well as minuses in the Government's economic policy. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>448</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>APPLES</title>
<page.no>448</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>448</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'BYRNE, Justin</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'BYRNE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Acting Minister for Trade is no doubt aware that Tasmania is expecting an all-time record apple crop of 7,000,000 bushels. The Minister for Primary Industry has notified the Tasmanian Government that no additional refrigerated shipping will be available to move this bumper harvest, which is of wonderful quality and pest-free, to overseas markets. Will the Minister see what the Federal Government can do to assist Tasmania in dealing expeditiously with this newly-arisen problem, which is an exceptional one due to the dry conditions hastening the ripening of the apples and the absence of pests, and at the same time help Tasmanian apple-growers to avoid the loss of this valuable and readily saleable crop? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>448</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- So far as this matter lies within the powers of the Department of Trade and the Department of Customs and Excise, I shall certainly see what can be done along the lines suggested by the honorable senator. I understand that in Tasmania there is a responsible body which organizes the shipment of apples and has done so far many years. That body obtains statistics from the growers relating to the possible quantities available, and arranges shipping accordingly. I should imagine that that pretty competent authority, on which is represented, I understand, the apple growers and all concerned in the industry, would have been in touch with the relevant authorities to ensure that additional shipping was provided, if it had considered that the position was as <inline font-weight="bold">Senator O'Byrne</inline> has described it. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>449</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KBW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WRIGHT, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator Wright</name>
</talker>
<para>- It did so on Monday, and it received a reply from the Minister this morning. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>449</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'BYRNE, Justin</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'Byrne</name>
</talker>
<para>- And there is no shipping available. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>449</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- In the light of that fact, I certainly shall take the matter up immediately and see whether there is anything we can do to rectify the matter. If we have this fine apple crop, we want to send it to the market which will give the best return to the growers. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>449</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TRADE</title>
<page.no>449</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>449</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KBW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WRIGHT, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator WRIGHT</name>