/
19671005_senate_26_s36.xml
9166 lines (9166 loc) · 665 KB
/
19671005_senate_26_s36.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1967-10-05</date>
<parliament.no>26</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>2</period.no>
<chamber>SENATE</chamber>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<business.start>
<day.start>1967-10-05</day.start>
<para>The <inline font-weight="bold">PRESIDENT (Senator the Hon. Sir Alister McMullin)</inline> took the chair at 11 a.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>F111 AIRCRAFT</title>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZB</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FITZGERALD, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Senator FITZGERALD</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Leader of the Government in the Senate whether the Australian Government and our own expert aircraft defence authorities are fully aware of the criticism levelled by both the United States Senate Defence Committee and the British Defence Department at certain defects in the F111 fighter bomber planes which have been ordered for Australia. Can the Minister tell the Parliament what action is being taken to ensure that these planes are the perfect aircraft for our purposes? What investigation is being made to ascertain whether adverse statements about the F111 have any foundation? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Supply</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Department of Air and the Government are well aware of criticism of the F111 in the United States of America. If the honourable senator reads the statement made by the Minister for Air in relation to this aircraft, he will find that the model most criticised in the United States is the F111B which is being prepared for the American Navy. As I understand the Minister's statement, the model ordered by Australia will be delivered on time and will be a first class aircraft for Australia. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>COMMONWEALTH. SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION</title>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1R</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PROWSE, Edgar</name>
<name role="display">Senator PROWSE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Minister for Education and Science seen in the Sydney Daily Telegraph' what purports to be a photograph of a group of maiden merino ewes with their cross-bred lambs? Is this a genuine case of virgin birth or could it be attributed to some spectacular achievement by the officers of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, hitherto unpublished, in the field of animal reproduction? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KH5</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GORTON, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator GORTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not actually seen the photograph referred to, but if it is described inthe way in which the honourable senator says it is I would at once dissociate the CSIRO from the whole affair. I think this is something more to do with art than with science. Probably the spectacular achievement has been on the part of the journalist who wrote the caption rather than anybody else. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ADELAIDE AIRPORT</title>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1Y</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BISHOP, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator BISHOP</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question, which is directed to the Minister representing the Minister for Civil Aviation, relates to altered parking facilities at the Adelaide airport. Will the Minister investigate complaints by drivers of motor cars parked at the airport on Sunday last that their departure from the parking area was delayed from 15 to 20 minutes because of congestion in the exit lanes, which have not been improved even though parking fees continue to apply? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZQ</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role>Minister for Customs and Excise</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ANDERSON, Kenneth</name>
<name role="display">Senator ANDERSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- -As requested by the honourable senator, I will seek some information from the Minister for Civil Aviation on the point that has been raised. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</title>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<type>distinguished visitors</type>
</debateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JTT</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DAVIDSON, Gordon</name>
<name role="display">Senator DAVIDSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister representing the Prime Minister whether he can confirm to the Senate an announcement by the Prime Minister in another place relating to the forthcoming visits to Australia of the Prime Minister of India, <inline font-weight="bold">Mrs Gandhi,</inline> and the Prime Minister of Canada, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr Lester</inline> Pearson. Recognising the impositions of the time factor, will steps be taken to ensure that future visits by at least some Prime Ministers or heads of state include States of the Commonwealth other than New South Wales and Victoria, especially as so many Prime Ministers seem to be planning very welcome visits to Australia? Will the Minister note the dates of the coming Adelaide Festival of Arts - from 9th to 23rd March - and suggest that the dates of one of the proposed visits coincide with them? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1181</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not think the honourable senator would want me to say other than that I can confirm the statement made by the Prime Minister yesterday. He did make the announcement mentioned. It is a fact that these very distinguished visitors are coming to see us. I take the honourable senator's point. He wishes these important people to see as much of Australia as possible. He wishes to get them away from the milk run - Sydney, Melbourne and Canberra. As a representative of a small </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">State I can understand that. I shall have pleasure in directing the question to the Prime Minister for his consideration. </para>
</speech>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA</title>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7Y</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TANGNEY, Dorothy</name>
<name role="display">Senator TANGNEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I address a question to you, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr President.</inline> It is supplementary to that asked by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Davidson,</inline> and relates to the forthcoming visit to Australia of the highly esteemed Prime Minister of India in the New Year. In view of the fact that at the time now scheduled for this visit the Senate will normally be in recess, will you use your good offices with the Government to ensure that as many members of the Senate as possible, particularly all women senators, will have an opportunity to meet this very distinguished visitor who has done so much for her country and for the Commonwealth? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRESIDENT, The</name>
<name role="display">The PRESIDENT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I anticipate that the port of entry of the Prime Minister of India will be in Western Australia. Knowing the honourable senator's particular sentimental reason for wanting her to visit Perth, I shall be pleased to make those representations to the Prime Minister. Further, 1 shall be very pleased also to make the suggestion to the Western Australian branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>QUARANTINE</title>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KV9</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MORRIS, Kenneth</name>
<name role="display">Senator MORRIS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct a question to the Minister representing the Minister for Health. Has any vessel engaged in the prawning industry recently been quarantined in any north Queensland port? If so, has the vessel - or have the vessels - been associated with the Japanese mother ship at present operating in that general area? What is the suspected illness, and what is the name of any vessel so quarantined? </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K28</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RANKIN, Annabelle</name>
<name role="display">Senator Dame ANNABELLE RANKIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- A New Guinea-registered vessel was quarantined at Weipa recently after a Papuan member of the crew, during a routine quarantine inspection, was found to have a rash. The Papuan and the vessel, together with one person on shore who bad been in contact with the vessel, were quarantined. Quarantine officers from Brisbane inspected the patient and determined that the illness was not smallpox or a quarantinable disease. At the moment, 1 cannot give the honourable senator the name of the vessel. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MATRIMONIAL CAUSES ACT</title>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K8Y</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>IND; AP from Aug. 1969; IND from Jan. 1970</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TURNBULL, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator TURNBULL</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister representing the Attorney-General whether the Attorney-General has given consideration to the Matrimonial Causes Act and whether he is prepared to state what guide lines there are in regard to the suppression of names. Will he obtain from the judge in the case that I mentioned in the debate on the adjournment the reasons that decided that judge to suppress the names? Finally, does the Attorney-General believe that the present power of discretion is justifiable in the public interest? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1182</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KH5</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GORTON, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator GORTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honourable senator is referring to a matter which he has raised in the Senate before. It relates to an action in which a judge, exercising his discretion, directed that some information should not be published. I think the first thing I should do is to repeat what I have already said in this chamber in reply to the statement made by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Turnbull</inline> in the debate on the adjournment. The honourable senator is referring to the Matrimonial Causes Act which is the result of the introduction of a private member's Bill passed by both Houses of this Parliament on a completely non-party basis. The Act states that the names, addresses and occupations of parties and witnesses, the names of members of the court, counsel and solicitors, and various other pieces of information may be published. The Act also gives the court a discretion if it thinks fit in any particular proceedings to order that none of the matters to which I have referred may be printed or published. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>The first point that I seek to make is that by an Act of this Parliament the court has been given the discretion to publish or not to publish matters which come before it. In those circumstances I should have thought that the suggestion which came from the honourable senator that a member of the Executive should question - or cross examine a judge on why it was that he exercised a discretion that was given to him by law had very serious implications for the relationship between an executive and the judiciary which has been built up with considerable struggle over a long period of years. It would appear to me to be completely wrong to suggest that a member of the Executive - as the honourable senator asks should happen - should go to the judge and ask what reasons he had for exercising a discretion that was given to him by an Act of Parliament to exercise as he saw fit. </para>
<para>I am unable to answer as to the personal beliefs of the Attorney-General. In any case, I would have thought that the use of question time to ask a Minister about the personal beliefs of another Minister would be out of order. If the honourable senator wants to know, he might ask the AttorneyGeneral himself in which case he might or might not get an answer. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1183</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MEAT WORKERS</title>
<page.no>1183</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K3J</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BULL, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Senator BULL</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is to the Minister representing the Minister for Primary Industry. What are the requirements of Commonwealth law for clothing to be worn by meat operatives engaged in the preparation of meat for export? Is there any relationship between these requirements and the conditions of the employment of the men? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTL</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role>Minister for Repatriation</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCKELLAR, Gerald</name>
<name role="display">Senator McKELLAR</name>
</talker>
<para>- Recently, amendments to the Commonwealth export meat regulations were promulgated to clarify the requirements of the Commonwealth in respect of clothing which should be worn by personnel engaged in the preparation of meat for export. I would stress that there has always been provision in those regulations on this matter and the amendments were introduced primarily for the purpose of clarification of those requirements. Briefly, the regulations require all personnel engaged in the slaughter and dressing of animals and the preparation of meat for export to be dressed in clean clothing - a necessary hygienic protection which I do not think anyone disputes. As to the relationship of this requirement to the conditions of employment of the men, this is a matter between the employees and their employers. The men have access to appropriate arbitration tribunals. It is not a matter for the Commonwealth; nor is it an appropriate subject for Commonwealth regulations. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1Y</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BISHOP, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator BISHOP</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is directed to the Minister representing the Minister for Primary Industry and follows on the question asked by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Bull.</inline> I ask the Minister: Is he aware that in most export abattoirs in most States equipment and overalls are supplied free to the slaughtermen and operators and that the responsibility for the observance of proper clothing conditions and proper health conditions is placed upon the employer? In view of this fact, will the Minister give consideration to the regulations which impose on the employees the responsibility for observance and the penalty for nonobservance? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTL</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCKELLAR, Gerald</name>
<name role="display">Senator McKELLAR</name>
</talker>
<para>- I thought that my answer to the question asked by <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Bull</inline> made the position plain. I said: 'It is not a matter for the Commonwealth; nor is it an appropriate subject for Commonwealth regulations'. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K6F</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CAVANAGH, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator CAVANAGH</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question to the Minister representing the Minister for Primary Industry is supplementary to previous questions relating to meatworks. Is it a fact that the regulation recently gazetted in relation to the clothing of employees in meatworks applies only to certain employees? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTL</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCKELLAR, Gerald</name>
<name role="display">Senator McKELLAR</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not examined the regulation and would like an opportunity to do so before replying to the honourable senator. I will transmit the question to the Minister for Primary Industry and see whether he can provide an answer for the honourable senator. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1183</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SHIPPING</title>
<page.no>1183</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1183</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JYA</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'BYRNE, Justin</name>
<name role="display">Senator O'BYRNE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Minister representing the Minister for Shipping and Transport seen a statement made by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr G.D'A.</inline> Chislett, the economist of the Australian Woolgrowers and Graziers Council, when addressing a seminar of the International Cargo Handling Co-ordination Association, to the effect that when the United Kingdom-Australia container trade starts in 1969 the Conference lines will have a monopoly? In view of the fact that the very basis of the Conference line type of shipping service is the avoidance of competition amongst members, will the Minister state whether the Government is committed to condoning the extension and perpetuation of this monopoly, or will careful consideration be given to bringing the Australian National Line into competition with the Conference vessels. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZQ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ANDERSON, Kenneth</name>
<name role="display">Senator ANDERSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- No, I have not seen the statement in the detail mentioned by the honourable senator and for that reason I ask that the question be placed on the notice paper so that I can refer it to the Minister for Shipping and Transport. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SHIPS GARBAGE</title>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQV</name.id>
<electorate>QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>CP; NCP from May 1975</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LAWRIE, Alexander</name>
<name role="display">Senator LAWRIE</name>
</talker>
<para>- My question is directed to the Minister representing the Minister for Health. As it is understood that Victoria has rejected the Commonwealth's offer to provide the cost of constructing incinerators for the disposal of ships garbage, is the Minister satisfied that adequate quarantine precautions are being taken in that State to dispose of ships garbage in such a way that there is no risk of foot and mouth disease and similar diseases being introduced into Australia? </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K28</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RANKIN, Annabelle</name>
<name role="display">Senator Dame ANNABELLE RANKIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- [ have noticed this comment in the Press and ] will bring the question to the attention of my colleague, the Minister for Health. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MATRIMONIAL CAUSES ACT</title>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K8Y</name.id>
<electorate>TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>IND; AP from Aug. 1969; IND from Jan. 1970</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TURNBULL, Reginald</name>
<name role="display">Senator TURNBULL</name>
</talker>
<para>- I preface my question to the Minister representing the Attorney-General by stating that time and time again we have been told by Ministers in this chamber that they will take queries to the Minister concerned in another place. I have raised the matter of the Matrimonial Causes Act on many occasions. Apparently the Minister, in reply to a previous question, stated that he did not know the opinion of the Attorney-General on the aspect raised. Why has he not discussed this matter with the Attorney-General and learned the Attorney-General's views? After all, he is the Minister representing the Attorney-General in this place. Will he find out whether the Attorney-General believes that the discretion given to judges by this Parliament should be withdrawn by this Parliament? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KH5</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GORTON, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator GORTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honourable senator knows, or should know, that when he has raised this general matter on previous occasions I have discussed it with the Attorney-General and have brought the Attorney-General's answer back here to pass on to him. It is not my fault if he was not here when those answers were brought back, but I point out that they appear in Hansard. As to the second point, I say to the honourable senator that this and the other House of the Parliament have passed legislation giving members of the judiciary discretion in certain respects. I do not propose to ask the Attorney-General whether, in his personal opinion, the legislation agreed to by both these Houses is good, bad, wrong or anything else. If the honourable senator wants to get a persona] opinion of that kind, let him go and ask the Attorney-General. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DISTRIBUTION OF THE SEXES</title>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7Y</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TANGNEY, Dorothy</name>
<name role="display">Senator TANGNEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Minister for Science and Education aware that Canberra has once again established a claim to be a unique city in that last year, contrary to the trend in other Australian and American cities, female births in the Australian Capital Territory were in excess of male births and that scientists are suggesting that climatic factors may be the cause of this most desirable result? Has any research on this matter been done by officers of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation? Does the Minister not think that this is a most worthy subject of research, or do not the researches of the CSIRO extend to human beings? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KH5</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GORTON, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator GORTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not know of any research' that has been engaged in by the CSIRO or any other scientific organisation to discover why more females than males are born in the ACT. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K7Y</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TANGNEY, Dorothy</name>
<name role="display">Senator Tangney</name>
</talker>
<para>- It would be a good idea. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KH5</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GORTON, John</name>
<name role="display">Senator GORTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am not sure that it is really something to which the resources of the nation should be devoted to any great extent. If we got some scientific results from such experiments it just might lead to arguments as to whether we should apply them to get more females than males or not apply them in order to get more males than females. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PRAWNS</title>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1184</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KV9</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MORRIS, Kenneth</name>
<name role="display">Senator MORRIS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct a question to the Minister representing the Prime Minister. Has the Government received recently from the Queensland Government a request for financial assistance to provide general facilities at any Gulf of Carpentaria ports for prawn processing operations? In particular, I refer to the provision of facilities like special entry roads and special port facilities, the provision of water for processing and that sort of thing. If the Minister has not this information at his fingertips, will he endeavour to find whether such an approach has been made, whether it has been considered, and whether there is a likelihood of an affirmative answer being given? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- At this stage I am not aware of any request that has been made by the Queensland Government to the Commonwealth Government for the provision of the facilities to which the honourable senator refers. From a recent visit to the area I do know that unquestionably in the Gulf of Carpentaria an enormous industry is developing which will be of tremendous value to Australia. That industry is based on prawn beds the existence of which has now been established in this vast area. I understand that a number of companies are interested in the area which is so big, I believe, that there would be plenty of room for them to operate with great benefit to themselves and great benefit to the export business of Australia. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>GERALDTON HARBOUR</title>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1R</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PROWSE, Edgar</name>
<name role="display">Senator PROWSE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I direct a question to the Leader 'of the Government in the Senate. Has any request for Commonwealth assistance been made by the Western Australian Government for the purpose of deepening Geraldton harbour? If the answer is yes, what consideration has been given to such request? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- As I understand it, the problem at Geraldton is the entrance which is shallow and of a rock formation which has been difficult to remove. The last reference I heard to this was that consideration was being given to using an atomic blast to remove the rock and deepen the entrance. That is the only information I have. The port is very busy. I have no knowledge at this stage as to whether special assistance has been requested by the Western Australian Government. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DESTRUCTION OF SHIPS GARBAGE</title>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KAS</name.id>
<electorate>VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WEBSTER, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator WEBSTER</name>
</talker>
<para>- -My question is addressed to the Minister representing the Minister for Health. Is the Minister able to inform the Senate of the reasons for the refusal by the Victorian Government to accept the offer of the Federal Government relating to the erection of incinerators for the disposal of ships garbage? </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K28</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RANKIN, Annabelle</name>
<name role="display">Senator Dame ANNABELLE RANKIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I cannot inform the Senate of the reasons but I will be pleased to ask my colleague the Minister for Health and, if possible, obtain from him the information for the honourable senator. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>REMITTANCE OF MONEY ABROAD</title>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>(Question No. 226) </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K2I</name.id>
<electorate>WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRANSON, George</name>
<name role="display">Senator BRANSON</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Treasurer, upon notice: </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>What powers has the Government to control or prohibit the sending of moneys out of Australia? </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HENTY, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Senator HENTY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Treasurer has provided the following answer: </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>The remittance of money abroad is subject to the provisions of Part III of the Banking Act 1959-1966 and to the Banking (Foreign Exchange) Regulations in force under that Part. In addition, it is an offence under the Defence Force Protection Act 1967 to take or send money abroad to certain specified bodies. </para>
</quote>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>REPATRIATION BENEFITS</title>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para class="block">(Question No. 271) </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KNR</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HANNAFORD, Douglas</name>
<name role="display">Senator HANNAFORD</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minis ter for Repatriation, upon notice: </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>How many persons, who have served in the (a) Citizen Military Forces (b) National Service (c) Air Force and (d) Navy have applied for Repatriation benefits during the past two years? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>How many applications for benefits have been granted, refused or deferred during that period? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>How many applications have been rejected under Section 47 of the Repatriation Act? </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>What is the Minister's definition of the word doubt' in Section 47 (1.) of the Act? </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>Has any fresh approach or inquiry been made over the last two years in the study of war neurosis? </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>When applications for war disability benefits are rejected, will the Minister give consideration to having reasons for the rejection made known to the applicant? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1185</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTL</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCKELLAR, Gerald</name>
<name role="display">Senator McKELLAR</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honourable senator's questions are as follows: </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>and 2. Statistics are not maintained according to the service of which a claimant was a member. Hence the information is not available in the form sought by the honourable senator. However, during the 2 years ended 30.6.67, 75,111 claims were lodged. In the same period 31,488 claims were accepted and 43,521 were not accepted. There were 7,130 claims awaiting attention at the beginning of the 2 year period and 7,232 at its conclusion. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>All claims must be determined in accordance with the relevant repatriation legislation of which section 47 forms a part. Thus a determining authority is bound by the section in every case to the extent that it is relevant to a particular set of facts. </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>The meaning of the word 'doubt' as used in section 47 has been explained by a former Attorney-General, now the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia. The former Attorney's opinion has been incorporated in Hansard (pages 694 to 696 of the 1963 Senate Hansard) and I have also arranged to provide a copy for the honourable senator. </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>The question covers a wide area of medical science. The causes, prevention and treatment of war neurosis are constantly under review by psychiatrists and psychologists, including psychiatrists in the Repatriation Department who keep in close touch with developments in other countries. </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>Determining authorities under the Repatriation Act are not required to give reasons for their decisions and in practice do not do so. I do not think a change in these arrangements would be practicable. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>1186</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BUSH FIRE RELIEF</title>
<page.no>1186</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>(Question No. 290) </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1186</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVK</name.id>
<electorate>NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MULVIHILL, James</name>
<name role="display">Senator MULVIHILL</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Treasurer, upon notice: </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>How much finance has been granted by the Commonwealth Government to the States since 1957 for bush fire relief? </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>1186</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KOW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>LP</party>