Port for Firefox?

[maxxcrawford]

Related issue: #3

Create a compatible version for Firefox (Manifest v2)

Context: https://twitter.com/Techman0/status/1590748545904410624#m

[leo60228]

Skimming the code, I don't see anything that'd even be affected by MV2 vs. MV3 changes.

[the-jame]

🙏

[helloimbernardo]

I believe that apart from a couple of manifest file changes the code itself works without alteration as Firefox should support all chrome.* APIs

I managed to get it to work by implementing this manifest file for the firefox version

[helloimbernardo]

In Manifest V2 the web_accessible_resources tag must recieve an array containing the resources while in Manifest V3 it should be an array of objects MDN Web Docs

[mazercore]

@helloimbernardo Great work. Currently its loaded in the temporary position for firefox, right now it displays this:

Reading manifest: Warning processing id: An unexpected property was found in the WebExtension manifest.

but otherwise it does work!

[helloimbernardo]

I edited my fork to work with Firefox by default and removing that issue (I wrongly assumed I needed to include the ID in the Manifest). Should work by default :)

[wseagar]

I edited my fork to work with Firefox by default and removing that issue (I wrongly assumed I needed to include the ID in the Manifest). Should work by default :)

Hi! Great work, can you please make a PR and I'll get it merged later today and write up instructions/docs?

[wseagar]

Thanks to @helloimbernardo for doing the initial work with manifest v2. Closing because we have submitted to the firefox store and a firefox release is on the releases page. We may/may not write manual installation instructions depending on how long firefox takes to approve. The issue below has all the relevant info I will be closing this issue now.

#13