Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changing the surrogate model - impact on gradients' formula #60

Open
CPJClare opened this issue Nov 1, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Changing the surrogate model - impact on gradients' formula #60

CPJClare opened this issue Nov 1, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@CPJClare
Copy link

CPJClare commented Nov 1, 2018

Hello Jian Wu,

I am currently exploring the use of different surrogates, as a Gaussian alternative and am considering building upon your gradients' work in Cornell-MOE to do so.

I have been reading your "Bayesian Optimization with Gradients" paper from NIPS 2017 - congratulations on an excellent paper. In Equation 3.3, you list the multi-output formula in terms of the Gaussian mean and covariance functions.

Assume the probabilistic model then changes, from say, Gaussian Processes (GPs), to multivariate Student-t, with a different mean and covariance function for the underlying Student-t process (STP).

Would Equation 3.3 remain the same (but with different STP mean and covariance inputs)?

OR

Does Equation 3.3 have to change, each time the underlying surrogate model changes, to reflect the properties of the new probabilistic model? For example, how would going from GPs to Random Forests work?

I would obviously then look to program any amendments into my own code, using Cornell-MOE as my starting-point (with citation).

Thank you.

Regards,
Conor Clare

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant