Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Overcoming uncertainity after scan phase by dynamically lowering accuracy threshold for self-labeling #128

Open
TomasPlachy opened this issue Nov 1, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@TomasPlachy
Copy link

Hello,

The first batch in the first epoch usually doesn't have confident enough samples to pass the 0.99 threshold for self-labeling. But if I lower the threshold to 0.9, it negatively effects the performance of the network (I have observed that most of the samples have over 0.99 probability score in the final epochs, but the accuracy is low).

Do you have any thoughts about progressively increasing the threshold for self-labeling? Or how would you tackle this issue?

@TomasPlachy TomasPlachy changed the title Overcomming 'Mask in MaskedCrossEntropyLoss is all zeros.' in early self-labeling phase without lowerinf accuracy treshold. Overcoming 'Mask in MaskedCrossEntropyLoss is all zeros.' in early self-labeling phase without lowering accuracy threshold. Nov 1, 2022
@TomasPlachy TomasPlachy changed the title Overcoming 'Mask in MaskedCrossEntropyLoss is all zeros.' in early self-labeling phase without lowering accuracy threshold. Overcoming uncertainity after scan phase by dynamically lowering accuracy threshold for self-labeling Nov 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant