You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
(9) "vote to disapprove the regular transactions of block N-1"
disapprove block
(10) block that did no pass vote in (9)
disapproved block
stripped block
punished block
(11) a kind of SPV that is specifically based on client-side filters; must distinguish from a) 'light' wallets here that rely on 3rd party service, b) most widespread SPV based on bloom filters (Electrum); ideally the term conveys increased privacy
gained more support than 'project subsidy', 'network fund' and 'project fund' in several chat discussions
Discussions
2019-03-20: "skin in the game" is hackneyed and vague, people have it in all crypto projects. The decision to forgo liquidity on exchange for the right to participate in governance warrants a term that is more meaningful and reflective of the difference between Decred and other projects; name for staking holder; people aren't going to understand a new concept until you explain it to them regardless of what you call it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am cautious about getting too far out ahead of the market in terms of creating brand new terms.
"Skin in the game" imho, is gaining mainstream traction as a term. If that’s the case (and I could be wrong), it's worth riding that wave for a bit instead of inventing a new term and trying to own the market position for it at the same time.
If Decred is the "skin in the game" destination for ppl yearning to participate in that type of community, it will see significantly more growth than if it's the leader in a term that no one else is googling.
Below are concepts whose names were discussed. I believe most are settled now, this issue is to make a record of that.
Concepts are numbered, name candidates are bullets below them.
Settled names
Discussions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: