-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 634
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The documentation needs serious refinement #532
Comments
@NickKaramoff I support this 100%! I also had to work with xhtml2pdf in the past and I really liked it. As I also wanted to start contributing to an open source project, I started improving xhtml2pdf bit by bit in the last few weeks. Improving the docs is as well on my to-do list, but I haven't had time for it yet. So I would be very grateful, if you would help improving the documentation. I'm 100% your opinion, that the documentation is pretty bad structured, misses a lot of things and needs a serious renewal. I'm not the maintainer nor do I fully understand all of the code yet. But if there's anything I could help you with, let me know. 😊 |
Hi, I agree with you documentation is very important and this project has a ugly documentation. |
I am sorry about how much time it took me to finally get to this. Sometimes I can't achieve the desired study/work/life balance 😅 Alright, I have been thinking, and I have so far come up with the following outline. First-level ToC entries are bold, my comments are italicized.
I would begin by sorting the existing documentation files. Tell me what you think about my structure and how it may be improved 😇 |
@kytta This outline looks great! Are you still motivated to improve the documentation a bit? Would be much appreciated! 💪 |
Hi and sorry for not having been active here for a while now; I no longer work at the place where I've used this package, yet I am still very much interested in making its documentation better! |
Problem
So, I have been working on a project where I had to use
xhtml2pdf
, so naturally, I was using the docs.Now, I really don't want to offend anyone, but the current docs are not good. The navigation is very confusing, finding information takes significant amounts of time, and some stuff isn't even included in the docs (I had to dig through the source code to discover
-pdf-word-wrap
).Some places of the "Reference" have
XXX
in them, and it's been this way for ages. The text can be unclear and creates more questions than answers.I am willing to help, and I am ready to refine the documentation myself. All I need is help from the maintainers (since I might have some questions about what the code does) and an approval to basically make lots of changes in the docs, possibly creating a huge PR.
Let me know what you think about it. This project has a huge potential (being AFAIK the only HTML-to-PDF library that doesn't require extraneous dependencies) and it's a shame that the docs aren't clear enough :(
Proposed structure
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: