Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need to say anything about redirect_user hint being a no-op if requesting party is non-human? #134

Closed
xmlgrrl opened this issue Feb 5, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels
core Related to (original UMA1) core spec scope; may use obsolete language V1.0 pub rvw timeframe

Comments

@xmlgrrl
Copy link

xmlgrrl commented Feb 5, 2015

In Section 3.4.1.2 of Core, currently we say nothing about redirect_user being applicable only to end-user requesting parties. Do we need to add something about this, or is it obvious? It's just a hint, after all.

@xmlgrrl xmlgrrl added core Related to (original UMA1) core spec scope; may use obsolete language V1.0 pub rvw timeframe labels Feb 5, 2015
@xmlgrrl
Copy link
Author

xmlgrrl commented Feb 22, 2015

In UMA telecon 2015-02-19, we agreed to add this sentence: "Note that the word "user" implies a human requesting party; if the requesting party is not an end-user, then no client action would be possible on receiving the hint." Added to Core rev 12a.

@xmlgrrl xmlgrrl closed this as completed Feb 22, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core Related to (original UMA1) core spec scope; may use obsolete language V1.0 pub rvw timeframe
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant