Domoticz lights refactoring

[mcspr]

• refactor domoticz lights handler into separate function
• less debugging strings. show that domoticz had parsed values in a single line. -480 bytes off the firmware. (travis03 dev:631248 domoticz/update:630768)
• fix relay getter to return signed value, as intended

cc @karmacoma92
please check if it fixes the problem you are experiencing (from gitter https://gitter.im/tinkerman-cat/espurna?at=5c7651cd8a7def0752e40812)

[karmacoma92]

Hi Max,

Tested and working, something weird appeared after first reboot, in the general tab instead of appearing Temperature#0
Humidity#0
appeared something like NaN#0 repeated a number of times, ...

it is working now Thanks a lot!
Oscar

[mcspr]

@karmacoma92 thank you.
about the second one - no idea right now. this function generates the string, but i cannot get it to output NaN with strings / numbers / nulls :/
if you'll have time, do you mind tracing websocket sensor data ({magnitudes: type:[...], ...} ) that is sent to the webui? if you are using chrome or safari, see /ws in the network tab of web developer tools (ctrl / cmd + shift + i)

[karmacoma92]

Hi Max,
It happened only once, the first time I finally upgraded it, I have tried to reproduce it upgrading another esp01s-dht11 but it didn't happened so I don't know if makes any sense to investigate further.
Here you have a screenshot of the requested trace, (I do not see anything weird though,...)

I'm experiencing some other problem with a basic Sonoff which I cannot swtich on, it keeps on going back to off, but I do not know if I should open a different case....

Thanks once more
Oscar

[mcspr]

ok, thanks anyways.
and btw, web inspector would only show the requests after they are made, meaning you need to have it active and then reload the page. it'll show /auth, hostname, and /ws, where /ws will have "frames" tab with websockets data. which may or may not have been broken, somehow.

I'm experiencing some other problem with a basic Sonoff which I cannot swtich on, it keeps on going back to off, but I do not know if I should open a different case...

---

if that is reproducible, then yes.

[karmacoma92]

I'll try reproducing it with the latest code from today but with the previous one, yes I can reproduce it....
Regarding the other issue, I was trying to reload with F5, but it was giving nothing as shown in the picture....

[karmacoma92]

I tried with a compilation with the changes form yesterday, but still the same, please tell me where to report it...
Thanks
Oscar