You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Implementation experience has demonstrated that there are areas of the specification that didn't get the balance right between precision for implementers and clarity for users, for example “non-step wrappers”. The XProc 2.0 specification should attempt to resolve these problems without introducing inordinate complexity.
The 1.0 specification also defines the p:pipeline element as a syntactic shortcut for a particular form of p:declare-step. While convenient in some circumstances, it has proven to be a source of some confusion especially among new users. XProc 2.0 may remove the p:pipeline element.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Implementation experience has demonstrated that there are areas of the specification that didn't get the balance right between precision for implementers and clarity for users, for example “non-step wrappers”. The XProc 2.0 specification should attempt to resolve these problems without introducing inordinate complexity.
The 1.0 specification also defines the p:pipeline element as a syntactic shortcut for a particular form of p:declare-step. While convenient in some circumstances, it has proven to be a source of some confusion especially among new users. XProc 2.0 may remove the p:pipeline element.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: