You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should field "sequence" share embeddings with the field "adgroup_id"? I found that the method "encoder.fit()" assigns the encoder such as tokenizer for each field. Since the given tiny datasets record the user historical behavior (ad sequence), then in my understanding that the id that appeared in the field "sequence" may also appear in the field "adgroup_id". As a result, it seems that the field "sequence" should share the same encoder (i.e., tokenizer) with the field "adgroup_id", but the demo "DeepFM_with_sequence_feature.py" gives separate encoders for these two fields.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should field "sequence" share embeddings with the field "adgroup_id"? I found that the method "encoder.fit()" assigns the encoder such as tokenizer for each field. Since the given tiny datasets record the user historical behavior (ad sequence), then in my understanding that the id that appeared in the field "sequence" may also appear in the field "adgroup_id". As a result, it seems that the field "sequence" should share the same encoder (i.e., tokenizer) with the field "adgroup_id", but the demo "DeepFM_with_sequence_feature.py" gives separate encoders for these two fields.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: