results are quite different from the results provided by you,where is ST_PLUS_TR_cross_cluster_v2?

[swjtu-ljc]

Hello, I found in the test log that the type of head and pose_head is ST_PLUS_TR_cross_cluster_v2, but there is no ST_PLUS_TR_cross_cluster_V2 module in the code. Have you made any changes based on ST_PLUS_TR_cross_cluster? I used the checkpoint provided by you and only got the results of Action Accuracy 83.988% and Activity Accuracy 94.914%, which are quite different from the results provided by you

[xueyee]

1. We’ll correct the version of this module in the code.
2. It seems like the mismatch of keypoints and flow data used in our experiments and yours. We’ll pack and upload origin data used in our training , which is time-comsuming
   due to its size. :) Please hold on.

[swjtu-ljc]

Thank you very much for your reply, and I'll keep an eye on your Github for origin data and updated code.

[joaoruivo00]

@swjtu-ljc how did you manage to run the code with ST_PLUT_TR_cross_cluster? As mentioned in another issue thread, it gives AssertionError: For batched (3-D) "query", expected "key" and "value" to be 3-D but found 4-D and 4-D tensors respectively