Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Filtering Segment Availability from Availability Service #77

Closed
archolewa opened this issue Oct 26, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Support Filtering Segment Availability from Availability Service #77

archolewa opened this issue Oct 26, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@archolewa
Copy link
Contributor

We are planning in the near future to pull availability off of Physical Tables, and instead make it a separate service tentatively keyed on the physical table and the query.

When doing so, it would be great if we also provide first-class support for filtering the availability segments returned by the service based on some predicate.

More concretely, I would like to be able to truncate a physical table's availability to the past 90 days, regardless of what the backing Druid datasource says.

@cdeszaq
Copy link
Collaborator

cdeszaq commented Apr 13, 2017

Update: I think this is being addressed / handled with #226 or perhaps #207. In the end, filtering the availability should be done within the PhysicalTable, which is also what is currently doing the "filter the availability down to the relevant columns".

Once this gets landed and stabilized, I'll circle back and update this issue with the outcome.

@cdeszaq cdeszaq added the CONFIG label Apr 13, 2017
@cdeszaq cdeszaq self-assigned this Apr 13, 2017
@cdeszaq
Copy link
Collaborator

cdeszaq commented May 26, 2017

@archolewa This should now be fixed, since the PR to address it just merged. If you find that not to be the case, please re-open this 😄

@cdeszaq cdeszaq closed this as completed May 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants