Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 6, 2018. It is now read-only.

POMs in master should be bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT #37

Open
tucu00 opened this issue Sep 29, 2010 · 5 comments
Open

POMs in master should be bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT #37

tucu00 opened this issue Sep 29, 2010 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@tucu00
Copy link
Contributor

tucu00 commented Sep 29, 2010

No description provided.

@rvs
Copy link
Contributor

rvs commented Oct 8, 2010

Given that master is our road to 3.0.0 shouldn't it be 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?

@tucu00
Copy link
Contributor Author

tucu00 commented Oct 8, 2010

I don't know, never saw what is the roadmap/plan....

@rvs
Copy link
Contributor

rvs commented Oct 8, 2010

Well, the roadmaps is easy to see now:
http://github.com/yahoo/oozie/issues/labels/oozie-3.0

But you didn't answer my question ;-)

@tucu00
Copy link
Contributor Author

tucu00 commented Oct 8, 2010

I'm OK to bump up POMs to 3.x in master.

Still, not clear to me how we'll proceed with 2.x development.

@rvs
Copy link
Contributor

rvs commented Oct 9, 2010

Oozie 2.x is in a 100% maintenance mode as far as Y! team is concerned. The only changes going there would be the ones needed to provide relief for urgent production issues. Everything else should be going into master as part of our work on 3.0.

To you, the 2.2 branch should not be of any interest (unless Cloudera already has customers running 2.2 in production).

Of course, the reason I'm asking this question about master is whether we're ready to bite the bullet and sprint towards 3.0 or whether having an intermediate goal(s) of 2.X releases
would be more convenient.

That said, the only reason I could think of where 2.3 would make sense would be if we decide to take care of the technical debt first, before taking onto the 3.0 issues (which doesn't seem to be the case).

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants