Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Base defenses #40

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 18, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Base defenses #40

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 18, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

See
http://groups.google.com/group/endgame-singularity/browse_thread/thread/9f472973
6f2ebd06

Original issue reported on code.google.com by funnyman3595 on 6 May 2008 at 5:57

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by funnyman3595 on 6 May 2008 at 5:57

  • Changed state: New

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I had a similar idea, of basically adding an "extra" (for lack of a better 
term) slot
to bases. That slot could have several uses, depending on what you put in it. 
Ideas:

Fake news company: global suspicion reduction per-day. Only one active at a 
time.
Research lab: % bonus to cpu when researching at base.
Fake company: +$$$ per day.
Construction depot: % reduction in cost and time for all bases in location. (As 
an
alternative to the other suggestion of the same name.)
Rapid response unit: discoveries in this location increase suspicion by less 
(10% to
7% or so.)
Active camouflage: decrease detection chance for this base even further.
Intruder elimination module: % chance of stopping any discovery at this base, 
maybe
with a small (1-2%) suspicion increase. (Doesn't work for science discoveries.)
Planetary bombardment system: Build to win the game using the "Humans? What 
humans?"
method. (Far reaches only.)
Global Freewill Eliminator: Win the game using the "Free will? What free will?"
method. (Continental only.)

I'm sure you can think of more...

Original comment by evilmrhe...@gmail.com on 6 May 2008 at 6:16

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Pushing back to 0.30.

Original comment by funnyman3595 on 11 Aug 2008 at 8:52

  • Added labels: Milestone-0.30
  • Removed labels: milestone-0.29

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Shifting to next release milestone.

Original comment by phil.bor...@gmail.com on 27 Jan 2009 at 12:36

  • Added labels: Milestone-0.31
  • Removed labels: Milestone-0.30

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

@evilmrhenry: I can see why you call yourself evil... "Humans?  What humans?" XD

Now onto something more serious... I do think that the "slots" are a good idea, 
but I 
think that instead having them be whole bases on their own (with 
near-negligible 
detection rates but a high maintenance cost) with a couple processors ... but 
not as 
the main point of the base.  Instead, the main point is the function of such 
bases... 
i.e. Evil Mr. Henry's Construction Depot, Fake Company, etc.

Original comment by Avaera8820 on 13 Oct 2009 at 9:16

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant