Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unreconized type stream #16

Open
kurtmc opened this issue Jan 25, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

unreconized type stream #16

kurtmc opened this issue Jan 25, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kurtmc
Copy link

kurtmc commented Jan 25, 2021

I am attempting to use this to backup a redis instance that I am using with lorawan-stack and when I run the tool I am getting the following output:

*2
$6
SELECT
$1
0
Database 0: 5 element dumpedError: Key ttn:v3:ns:application-uplinks:uid:halter:uplinks:invalidation is of unreconized type stream

For more context I am using AWS ElastiCache engine version 5.0.5.

@yannh
Copy link
Owner

yannh commented Jan 26, 2021

Hi @kurtmc , thanks for the report! It looks like this is not supported yet. What would be the expected behaviour - that the Stream is recreated on the target redis server?

Happy to accept a patch, even if only for the test! Otherwise I might get to it but I can't promise when.

@yannh yannh added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 26, 2021
@kurtmc
Copy link
Author

kurtmc commented Jan 26, 2021

Thanks for the response @yannh. I guess I don't really know what they expected behavior should be. My goal was just to make a backup of all the data in redis so that I could restore it if something went wrong and I broke some of the data in the application. As I have been thinking about it I have decided just to make use of the AWS backup mechanism so I won't pursue getting it working with this tool.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants