Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

'yarn why' breaks trying to find non-existent registry entry for private scoped lerna package. #5399

Open
estaub opened this issue Feb 24, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@estaub
Copy link

estaub commented Feb 24, 2018

I have a lerna monorepo, where lerna puts a symlink in the node_modules of a child package to depend on a sibling package. The subprojects are all private and scoped. When I try to perform

yarn why pg-promise (an unrelated package)

I get:

`An unexpected error occurred: "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@semanterra%2fyeanay-server-shared: Not found".

The subprojects aren't registered anywhere; since they are private, I wouldn't think they would have to be.

yarn-error.log

@ghost ghost assigned rally25rs Feb 24, 2018
@ghost ghost added the triaged label Feb 24, 2018
@estaub
Copy link
Author

estaub commented Feb 25, 2018

This is a dupe of the unfixed (i.e., non-auth) aspects of #3755.

@rally25rs
Copy link
Contributor

closing as duplicate

@estaub
Copy link
Author

estaub commented Feb 27, 2018

@rally25rs, Given that the issues raised in this were never addressed by the fix to #3755, which only addressed auth, I don't think closing it as a dupe makes much sense. If you mean to say "we're not going to address this", that's different.

@aewing
Copy link

aewing commented Apr 15, 2018

This is incredibly irritating, and currently preventing most operations that should really have no reason to fail when unable to resolve a remote... Perhaps an option to ignore these errors from a given org would suffice...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants