LICENSE file appears to be MIT license, but metadata claims BSD-3

[TC01]

Hi,

I'm looking at packaging the Haskell url module for Fedora, and I'm a little confused about the licensing.

The included license file is the text for the MIT license. However, the included cabal metadata claims the software is under the BSD license. This is also what's stated in the header of URL.hs.

Did the wrong LICENSE file get included in the repository?

[juhp]

Same story for haskell-lexer.