-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Formula Expansions by . (dot) in plm Estimation Commands #35
Comments
Thank you for bringing this to our attention! I had a first look and need to look at this more closely at some later point in time.
Another observation about
-> The branch |
I have something 'almost ready' and hope to commit soon. Will go into next release. |
fixed in 76b03df This requieres package Formula in min. version 1.2-5 currently not on CRAN but available on R-Forge. |
addendum: pkg Formula 1.2-5 now on CRAN / 2023-02-24 |
From Twitter: Is there any reason why in #R with the plm-command for a fixed-effects-regression I cannot for the formula use the usual " y ~ . , data = df, ..." notation? It only works if I explicitly give it " y ~ x1 + x2 + ...". Which is impracticable if you have 440 variables...
PS: It’s a matter of passing the data frame to the data argument of terms.formula e.g. terms(mpg ~ ., data = mtcars) does the job.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: