-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 298
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do we want to remove Bower? #1106
Comments
I think we should focus on removing from We could remove it from the core doesn't really bring much value; and having this doesn't add any extra dependencies. So personally I'd keep until there's a reason to get rid of it. |
I personally think it’s about time to get rid of it.
What do you think about deprecating it? Edit: |
I don't care too much about bower, I'm on board to fully remove if you think it's creating unnecessary noise / give wrong impressions to the Yeoman users. |
mmm.. maybe I can start with |
Sounds like a plan 👍 |
This issue is stale because it has been open 15 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days |
Hi team!
As we know Bower has been deprecated. We still have
bowerInstall()
to manage Bower dependency, as well in the official Doc. If you agree I can prepare a PR to remove it and update the docs in the website and updategenerator-generator
too.What do you think? 😄
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: