You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This will be needed to distinguish the prefixes of variants in union types (#118), and will allow us to move some more things from doc comments into types in the OpenType spec.
I'm proposing the following implementation process:
Add the syntax and type checking rules for: { <ident> : <type> | <boolean-predicate> }
Add check for the boolean predicate while parsing, failing the current parse if it evaluates to false
(Mid term) Add syntactic sugar for record fields with operator expressions
This will be needed to distinguish the prefixes of variants in union types (#118), and will allow us to move some more things from doc comments into types in the OpenType spec.
I'm proposing the following implementation process:
{ <ident> : <type> | <boolean-predicate> }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: