Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Early game end suggestion may be incorrect #62

Open
yoavst opened this issue Oct 13, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Early game end suggestion may be incorrect #62

yoavst opened this issue Oct 13, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@yoavst
Copy link

yoavst commented Oct 13, 2018

Bug:
possibleWinner() does not take multiple islands into account.

Situation:
I've been playing a user level with multiple island, in which you need to conquer all the islands to win.
While I was having hard time winning on the last island while doing the right moves on the other islands, I was offered to stop playing and win (the "Win or continue" dialog).
However, on that very last island, I don't think from the current situation I'll be able to ever win.

Example

@yiotro
Copy link
Owner

yiotro commented Oct 13, 2018

Hmm, I'm not sure about that, but I think that the idea of this level is that it can't be won by killing all your enemies, but it's enough for 'early win' conditions.

@yoavst
Copy link
Author

yoavst commented Oct 14, 2018

It is possible to kill all your enemies. I was able to win 5 out of 6 in a single game, and win the last island on a new game, so it is definitely possible.

@subchannel13
Copy link
Contributor

@yoavst Suppose this was a multiplayer game, if you won on all but one island, had >70% territory, who should be declared a winner?

@yoavst
Copy link
Author

yoavst commented Oct 14, 2018

@subchannel13 I agree in this situation. However, in case of a single player game or specifically a map like this one, the hardness of the level is to be able to focus on all the islands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants