Show tatoeba process

[DanBmh]

I also changed the label type, because this solved a problem i had and the other datasets seemed to have LL_WORD_TRANSCRIPT as default and LL_WORD_TRANSCRIPT_RAW only optionally.

[aahlenst]

I understand the desire for progress information, but this does not look like the right approach to me. print() prints to stdout without given users any control over it. Using Python's logging facility instead of print() would help. Then, Audiomate is primarily a library. Using tqdm deep inside the library is not appropriate in my opinion because it forces tqdm upon everyone. Maybe there's a way to offer some sort of callbacks to make using tqdm an opt-in feature.

Regarding LL_WORD_TRANSCRIPT, please open another pull request (separate discussion) and add a test if possible

[DanBmh]

Ok, i will move the LL_WORD_TRANSCRIPT commit to another branch. What about the updated comment, shall i make a third pull request for it?

Regarding the tqdm and print suggestions, you are using both in the other files, for example here, so i thought it would be ok to use them too.

[aahlenst]

In my opinion, you can do the comment together with LL_WORD_TRANSCRIPT.

Regarding tqdm/printing, I'm sorry that it hit you. Let's see what @ynop has to say.

[ynop]

I added those things when I needed it.
But, @aahlenst is right, it is not a good solution.
I guess we should find a better way to do it.

[DanBmh]

I would suggest then we merge this with tqdm and print and you find a better way some other time:)

[aahlenst]

@DanBmh #114 brought the necessary infrastructure for logging. Care to update your PR?

[DanBmh]

Do you plan to implement a prediction for the time to completion in your logger?
I found this helpful in very long running tasks (>4h).

[ynop]

No plans so far.
But would be easy to implement based on the 5 minute logging cycle and nice to have.
If you'd like to do it, you can add it and open a PR.

[ynop]

Could you merge the two commits? Afterwards I can merge it.

[DanBmh]

Done. Why didn't you merge this before updating the logging?

[ynop]

Because, I didn't think about that before merging the logging.
And it is cleaner instead of introducing more "bad examples" and correct it right again.