Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Render navigation signs #6

Open
ClaudeMa opened this issue Nov 13, 2012 · 10 comments
Open

Render navigation signs #6

ClaudeMa opened this issue Nov 13, 2012 · 10 comments

Comments

@ClaudeMa
Copy link

list of sign and icons are here

http://www.freietonne.de/index.php?site=38&infotyp=1&editgps=156187&thema=366&PHPSESSID=63svqdobuprvn9jq00b6k2fpt3&redirect=122

the harbour of Chalon sur Saône have many of this tag
http://osm.org/go/0A5qNetb7-

@ClaudeMa
Copy link
Author

searching for tag waterway:sign i have found CEVNI Notice Marks used in European Inland Waterways

maybe use these tags in replacement of one from Freitonne

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenSeaMap/CEVNI_Notice_Marks

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Member

Yes, for now, as principle, let's stay the closer possible to OpenSeaMap when it makes sense.

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Member

I suggest to display them only at zoom 18, what do you think?

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Member

Humm, in Chalon-sur-Saône, I see a "no_u_turn" sign, which is not is the CEVNI list. Do you think it's "no_turning"?

@ClaudeMa
Copy link
Author

yes it is "no_turning" in freitonne extention the vale is "no_u_turn"
ok for rebdering at zoom 18

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Member

@ClaudeMa I've pushed a first version, but it appears that the values we have in db do not fit the icons names of the CEVNI list. Do you know a way to get the mapping between both?

(Visible here: http://fluv.io/#18/46.77729/4.86188 )

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Member

An another source of waterway signs icons: http://www.gimnechiske.org/files/INT-1/SVG/

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Member

Damn, it seems that OpenSeaMap uses seamark:* and not waterway:sign.
I'm not really big fan of the idea of using seamark as a generic tag, but I think we have to stay close to OpenSeaMap to help the OSM database and usages keep consistent.
seamark:type = 107.099 nodes (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/seamark%3Atype)
waterway:sign = 8.215 nodes (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=waterway:sign

yohanboniface added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2013
yohanboniface added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2013
yohanboniface added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2013
yohanboniface added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2013
@pyrog
Copy link

pyrog commented Jun 28, 2013

@Dirk--
Copy link

Dirk-- commented Jan 2, 2015

using OpenSeaMap's transparent seamark tiles as an overlay makes more sense to me!
Preview: http://maps.grade.de/mobile.htm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants