Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MAE(7.436) and e-error(0.543) compared with References[2]'s best score MAE(3.252) and e-error(0.282) #22

Open
zzjing83 opened this issue Jan 5, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@zzjing83
Copy link

zzjing83 commented Jan 5, 2018

Hi Yusuke. Thanks your repo firstly. It helps me a lot. My work following your repo is as below:
1, I cleaned the imdb dataset manually and converted them to imdb_zz.mat.
2, Training on imdb_zz.mat. --aug Ture, depth 16 width 8 as default. num_epochs 30.
3, the minimum val_loss is 3.49 and the weights stored as weights.25-3.49.hdf5.
4, Using weights.25-3.49.hdf5 to predict images. I test on LAP dataset as References[2] mentioned. However, my score is much worse than References[2] as discribled in title and it predicts young people(age<15) badly.

i am looking forward to your reply and any advice is welcomed.
Thank you.

@yu4u
Copy link
Owner

yu4u commented Jan 5, 2018

Thank you for testing this project on the LAP dataset!
Please note that this project is not intended to reproduce the results of the papers [1, 2] (of cause I'm interested in doing that).
Anyway, I think the most important thing to improve the accuracy is to fine-tune the model using the LAP training dataset. Did you try that?
Indeed it is not trivial because the LAP dataset is for a single task of age estimation while age and gender are simultaneously estimated on the model of this project.

@Riolite5
Copy link

Hello everyone, what is the difference between loss and val_loss ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants