You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your great contribution. I was unable to understand the difference in usage for the sliding length and sliding padding. For example, if I wanted to utilize X days for a forecasting problem, what would be the proper usage for the parameters be?
Thank you in advance.
sliding_length
sliding_padding
Note: I noticed on my dataset that using 24 =>sliding length > 1 yields better results, however for sliding length >24 a size mismatch error occurs at evaluation.
The impact for increasing the padding was less impactful than the length, so if you can clarify the proper usage it would be great.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This figure illustrates the process of causal sliding inference. "sliding_length" is the step size of the sliding window. For each window, we require the representations on a slice with size "sliding_length". The "padding" only provides the contextual information for that slice, and we ignore the representation of the "padding". Commonly, sliding_length should be set to 1, and sliding_padding is the window size (i.e. X) for historical data.
Thank you for your great contribution. I was unable to understand the difference in usage for the sliding length and sliding padding. For example, if I wanted to utilize X days for a forecasting problem, what would be the proper usage for the parameters be?
Thank you in advance.
sliding_length
sliding_padding
Note: I noticed on my dataset that using 24 =>sliding length > 1 yields better results, however for sliding length >24 a size mismatch error occurs at evaluation.
The impact for increasing the padding was less impactful than the length, so if you can clarify the proper usage it would be great.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: