Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[docdb] Improve efficiency of handling of subtransaction-related data #13823

Open
robertsami opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

[docdb] Improve efficiency of handling of subtransaction-related data #13823

robertsami opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@rthallamko3
Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature priority/medium Medium priority issue

Comments

@robertsami
Copy link
Contributor

robertsami commented Aug 31, 2022 •
edited by yugabyte-ci

Jira Link: DB-4597
There are multiple places where we are performing a copy of AbortedSubTransactionSet. We should change this to a more efficient move wherever possible (assuming that the underlying boost data structures are efficiently move-able)
@robertsami robertsami self-assigned this Aug 31, 2022
@rthallamko3 rthallamko3 changed the title [dst] Improve efficiency of handling of subtransaction-related data [docdb] Improve efficiency of handling of subtransaction-related data Dec 29, 2022
@rthallamko3 rthallamko3 added the area/docdb YugabyteDB core features label Dec 29, 2022
@yugabyte-ci yugabyte-ci added kind/bug This issue is a bug priority/medium Medium priority issue kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature and removed kind/bug This issue is a bug labels Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rthallamko3 rthallamko3

Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature priority/medium Medium priority issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@robertsami @rthallamko3 @yugabyte-ci