Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is the consistency regularization exists in train.prototxt? #4

Closed
FlyingQianMM opened this issue Jun 5, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Is the consistency regularization exists in train.prototxt? #4

FlyingQianMM opened this issue Jun 5, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@FlyingQianMM
Copy link

It seems that the train.prototxt file does not contain the the consistency regularization in your paper.
Is there something I overlook? If not, could you supply a full file? Thanks a lot!
@wjx2
Copy link

wjx2 commented Jun 28, 2018

@FlyingQianMM
hi, do you get the full file?

@FlyingQianMM
Copy link
Author

No, exactly codes the author supplies now.

@lly2111101
Copy link

@FlyingQianMM
hi, do you run the codes with unlabeled target domain data set successfully?

@tingjiaqi123
Copy link

@lly2111101
hi, do you run the codes with unlabeled target domain data set successfully so far?

@yuhuayc
Copy link
Owner

yuhuayc commented Jan 16, 2019

Hi guys, please use the caffe2 implementation if you want to use consistency loss: https://github.com/krumo/Detectron-DA-Faster-RCNN

@yuhuayc yuhuayc closed this as completed Jan 16, 2019
@JeromeMutgeert JeromeMutgeert mentioned this issue Feb 19, 2019
Open
@Liyw979
Copy link

Liyw979 commented Feb 22, 2020

Yes!This is bothering me too

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@Liyw979 @yuhuayc @tingjiaqi123 @FlyingQianMM @lly2111101 @wjx2