Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace prettify.js #6

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 10, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Replace prettify.js #6

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 10, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

[Condensed from discussion on a different bug tracker.]

dborowitz:
> I don't think prettify.js supports [deep linking to line number fragments]

sop:
It doesn't, that is why we don't have this feature. I wanted to add it
but it wasn't easy, so I punted.  :-)

dborowitz:
> so we'd either need to add it upstream or switch our prettification engine. 
We might be able to hack in some <a> tags in the output we throw in the <pre>, 
but I don't know how that will interact with prettify.

sop:
Uhm, you should look at what project hosting does... and not do that.
They run prettify.js, and then run another JavaScript that
post-processes the pretty.js output in order to reformat the HTML to
get anchors at each line, and reformat the whole thing into a table.
Actually this is similar to what Gerrit Code Review does too, but I
think the way Gerrit does this is only slightly less hacky. We don't
rely on a timer polling the window to see when prettify.js is done,
and then run twice.

I was leaning towards switching to Jgments and doing the formatting at
the server side, but [our internal] build is broken.... Formatting on the 
server side
will also bloat the response side significantly, but its what all of
the cool kids do (GitHub, ...).

Someone pointed out another JavaScript based formatter recently, but
it doesn't look to be nearly as pluggable as prettify.js is. It only
applies on <pre> blocks already in the DOM like prettify, you can't
call it and steal its output the way Gerrit does.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dborowitz@google.com on 11 Nov 2012 at 11:28

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

[deleted comment]

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/56453

Original comment by jrn@google.com on 15 Jul 2014 at 8:02

  • Changed state: Verified

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant