You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sorry for interrupting you here. I notice that both tools employ multi-objective genetic programming (MOGA) as the core repair algorithm for patch generation, where the first objective is the patch size, and the second is failure rate. Here I would like to ask a question: Would minimal patch size sacrifice the effectiveness of Arja and Arja-e? I am currently exploring next step of APR, during which I observed that many bugs in Defects4J, multi-hunk bugs in particular, always requires multiple edits. Therefore, if the patch size is limited, it might limit the ability of Arja(-e) to generate multi-edit patches according. Thus, I have such a doubt which I would like to present for your further guidance. It would be sincerely appreciated if any advice could be offered. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Sir,
Sorry for interrupting you here. I notice that both tools employ multi-objective genetic programming (MOGA) as the core repair algorithm for patch generation, where the first objective is the patch size, and the second is failure rate. Here I would like to ask a question: Would minimal patch size sacrifice the effectiveness of Arja and Arja-e? I am currently exploring next step of APR, during which I observed that many bugs in Defects4J, multi-hunk bugs in particular, always requires multiple edits. Therefore, if the patch size is limited, it might limit the ability of Arja(-e) to generate multi-edit patches according. Thus, I have such a doubt which I would like to present for your further guidance. It would be sincerely appreciated if any advice could be offered. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: