New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Testing result #52
Comments
If there is no problem with your codes and environment. It's very easy to get 42.0 with fgd_cascade_mask_rcnn_rx101_32x4d_distill_faster_rcnn_r50_fpn_2x_coco.py. Many users have run this result for many times. |
Hi,here is my training log.Is there something wrong? |
The first 2 epochs seem right. Maybe now you have run the accurate results? |
Yep |
So what's the problem before? Maybe others can also meet this problem. |
Training parameters problem.Using big batch 28 -> 88,but using small lr 0.02. |
Hi, I have runnd faster_rcnn_res50 for detection and mask_rcnn_res50 for segmentation, all configs are same with paper, I got bbox_mAP 40.8 and segm_mAP 36.6, witch is a gap with paper bbox_mAP 42.0 and segm_mAP 37.8.
I want to know your benchmark running once or several times pick out best results?
Thank your~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: