Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kerberos authentication for web monitoring #1298

Open
ISnotes opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Kerberos authentication for web monitoring #1298

ISnotes opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@ISnotes
Copy link

ISnotes commented Mar 18, 2024

Hello!
It would be great to be able to have kerberos support in containers. There are currently no krb5-user or krb5-workstation packages in the image
https://www.zabbix.com/documentation/current/en/manual/appendix/items/kerberos

@paskal
Copy link

paskal commented Jun 9, 2024

Just FYI, it's relatively trivial to build your own image on top of the ones provided here. here is an example of adding mariadb packages to zabbix-agent2.

@ISnotes
Copy link
Author

ISnotes commented Jun 9, 2024

Just FYI, it's relatively trivial to build your own image on top of the ones provided here. here is an example of adding mariadb packages to zabbix-agent2.

It's great. I would like to see support from the vendor out of the box so that you don't have to rebuild the container with each new version

@paskal
Copy link

paskal commented Jun 9, 2024

The agent supports numerous features, but many aren’t included by default to keep the base image small. I find that tradeoff reasonable.

@ISnotes
Copy link
Author

ISnotes commented Jun 9, 2024

The agent supports numerous features, but many aren’t included by default to keep the base image small. I find that tradeoff reasonable.

It is reasonable to fully support the functionality of the product. Only 1 package is missing. Not 10, but one. Then what is the profit from the agent in the container, if you need to reassemble it yourself and regularly? The position is very strange. I switched completely to zabbix in docker, I was unpleasantly surprised

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants