Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for a 'server key' #10

Closed
shakvaal opened this issue Mar 25, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Add support for a 'server key' #10

shakvaal opened this issue Mar 25, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@shakvaal
Copy link

e.g. agi(googletts.agi,"text",[language],[intkey],[speed],[serverkey])

The serverkey, when provided, is then passed into all API requests as a key=<serverkey> parameter, according to official Google guide.

Same goes for zaf/asterisk-googletranslate.

@zaf
Copy link
Owner

zaf commented Mar 25, 2014

I am aware that google started giving access to speech API but as far as i know only in US based costumers, so currently i don't have access on it to test and develop.
As far as google translate agi script is concerned it already supports API keys, but not as arguments in the command line, I don't think this is useful or secure.

@zaf
Copy link
Owner

zaf commented Mar 28, 2014

Some updates on this: Seem like the way to get access to the speech API is to join chromium-dev group: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!forum/chromium-dev (Very funny google...)
Joining the group will give you instand access to the speech API. The API looks a bit limited at the moment, it only allows 1.0 requests/second/user and a total of 50 requests/day. So it can only be considered as a testing/developing option. Also it only gives access to speech recognition services so this is more relevant to asterisk-speech-recog than asterisk-googletts

@FabMira
Copy link

FabMira commented Jan 5, 2016

hey i've joined the group but I've haven't found the way to get de API key, could you be mor specific?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants