Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nczarr-c (v2) #35

Open
joshmoore opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

nczarr-c (v2) #35

joshmoore opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member

see: https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/documentation/NUG/nczarr_head.html

This could likely be split between CLI tools, C, and Java implementations.

cc: @DennisHeimbigner @haileyajohnson

@WardF
Copy link

WardF commented Apr 21, 2021

Tagging myself in on this as well. @WardF

@WardF
Copy link

WardF commented Apr 21, 2021

To add a clarifying note from an internal Unidata conversation, one thing we'll need to keep in mind is that nczarr (as implemented in the netcdf C library), and the addition of zarr support in netcdf-Java, are two different projects being handled by different personnel.

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member Author

joshmoore commented Apr 22, 2021

Is the plan to have netcdf-Java support zarr, nczarr, or both?

@WardF
Copy link

WardF commented Apr 22, 2021

@joshmoore Just to clarify, do you mean nczarr? Or is czar a separate thing?

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member Author

Or is czar a separate thing?

Oh Jeez. I hope not!! (Corrected my typo 😉)

@haileyajohnson
Copy link

As of now, the scope of the netcdf-java implementation will only be explicitly supporting zarr (i.e. not reading ".nczarray" or ".nczattr"). We can later expand the implementation to read nczarr as well, but the primary goal is java support for reading zarr into the common data model.

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member Author

Ok. Splitting this into two issues then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants