Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENH: Add support for dask and rapids #16

Closed
zbrookle opened this issue Mar 1, 2020 · 8 comments
Closed

ENH: Add support for dask and rapids #16

zbrookle opened this issue Mar 1, 2020 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request nostale Don’t go stale stale

Comments

@zbrookle
Copy link
Owner

zbrookle commented Mar 1, 2020

No description provided.

@acivitillo
Copy link

Thanks for this, me and my team use dask and it makes sense to run SQL on top of parquet files on AWS S3 using something like this rather than a completely different product like Spark or AWS Spectrum.

What are your plans with this library? I see you are parsing the SQL with lark and mapping SQL objects to Pandas objects. I am trying to understand where you want to bring this. In theory with dask you could have this doing what spark sql or apache drill do. What are your thoughts?

@zbrookle
Copy link
Owner Author

@acivitillo Yes thanks for asking! That's exactly where the project is going. It always seemed strange to me that spark was the go-to program when someone wants to use sql with an open source data processing framework when the same thing could be done for all the python based frameworks, so this package is meant to fill that gap in capability

@zbrookle zbrookle self-assigned this May 29, 2020
@zbrookle zbrookle added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 27, 2020
@acivitillo
Copy link

Will your dask support be available once Ibis adds theirs?

Seems they plan to add support: https://ibis-project.org/

@zbrookle
Copy link
Owner Author

@acivitillo Yes, the moment ibis finishes dask support I’ll be adding that into this package

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 18, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Apr 18, 2021
@zbrookle zbrookle pinned this issue Apr 18, 2021
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Apr 18, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 17, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jun 17, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jun 24, 2021
@zbrookle zbrookle removed the stale label Sep 3, 2021
@zbrookle zbrookle reopened this Sep 3, 2021
@zbrookle zbrookle added the nostale Don’t go stale label Sep 3, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 2, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Nov 2, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Nov 9, 2021
@zbrookle zbrookle reopened this May 1, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the stale label May 1, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 1, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jul 1, 2022
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jul 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request nostale Don’t go stale stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants