Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Determine what subset of zcashd wallet functionality will be required by users in a replacement wallet (independent of how it is accessed) #1350

Open
3 tasks
nuttycom opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@nuttycom
Copy link
Contributor

nuttycom commented Apr 12, 2024

  • what are the requirements from the mining community?
  • what are the requirements from exchanges?
  • what are the requirements for wallet data migration?
@nuttycom nuttycom added this to the Zcashd wallet replacement milestone Apr 12, 2024
@daira daira changed the title Determine what subset of zcashd wallet functionality will be required by users in a replacement wallet. Determine what subset of zcashd wallet functionality will be required by users in a replacement wallet (independent of how it is accessed) Apr 24, 2024
@str4d
Copy link
Contributor

str4d commented Apr 25, 2024

@hhanh00 posted this list of capabilities on the forum (most of which map to existing JSON-RPC methods, but the relevance to this issue is the functionality):

From the point of view of an dex dev, I’d like to mention the API/features that I’ve been relying on in zcashd:

  • regnet with custom activation heights
  • generate
  • list accounts
  • get new account
  • get address for account
  • get utxos
  • get balance
  • import address
  • shield coinbase
  • z send many
  • get block count
  • get block hash
  • get block
  • invalidate block
  • reconsider block
  • get transaction (with tx input address.& amount, insightexplorer=1)
  • get raw transaction
  • get raw mempool
  • send raw transaction

@daira
Copy link
Contributor

daira commented May 1, 2024

Some of the considerations in zcash/zcash#6690 might be relevant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants