New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Customer Satisfaction to ZenML 0.20.2 #43
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice one! Left a few comments
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ def handle_return( | |||
self, | |||
obj: Union[ | |||
str, | |||
np.ndarray, | |||
numpy.ndarray, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was facing an error with the materializer which didn't make sense! I was just modifying a lot of stuff and didn't revert this back! will do it right now
@@ -7,20 +7,17 @@ | |||
from zenml.integrations.mlflow.mlflow_utils import get_tracking_uri |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to run from a YAML file instead using the new method described here: https://docs.zenml.io/advanced-guide/pipelines/settings#method-3-configuring-with-yaml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good now but might make sense to add more details of running with the config file in the README?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some small changes in this review, but the biggest thing currently is that the deployment pipeline doesn't seem to work for me. Let's try again together tomorrow at some point?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One other change I'd make is to increase the pinned zenml version to 0.20.5 (i.e. the current latest version) since we know it works.
Otherwise I've tested this on my end and it works, so nice job on making that work again!
Describe changes
Update the custom satisfaction ZenFile to work with ZenML 0.20.2!
Pre-requisites
Please ensure you have done the following:
Types of changes