来源

CodeBERT/code2nl

CodeXGLUE -- Code-To-Text

Task Definition

The task is to generate natural language comments for a code, and evaluted by smoothed bleu-4 score.

Dataset

The dataset we use comes from CodeSearchNet and we filter the dataset as the following:

• Remove examples that codes cannot be parsed into an abstract syntax tree.
• Remove examples that #tokens of documents is < 3 or >256
• Remove examples that documents contain special tokens (e.g. <img ...> or https:...)
• Remove examples that documents are not English.

Download data and preprocess

unzip dataset.zip
cd dataset
wget https://s3.amazonaws.com/code-search-net/CodeSearchNet/v2/python.zip
wget https://s3.amazonaws.com/code-search-net/CodeSearchNet/v2/java.zip
wget https://s3.amazonaws.com/code-search-net/CodeSearchNet/v2/ruby.zip
wget https://s3.amazonaws.com/code-search-net/CodeSearchNet/v2/javascript.zip
wget https://s3.amazonaws.com/code-search-net/CodeSearchNet/v2/go.zip
wget https://s3.amazonaws.com/code-search-net/CodeSearchNet/v2/php.zip

unzip python.zip
unzip java.zip
unzip ruby.zip
unzip javascript.zip
unzip go.zip
unzip php.zip
rm *.zip
rm *.pkl

python preprocess.py
rm -r */final
cd ..

Data Format

After preprocessing dataset, you can obtain three .jsonl files, i.e. train.jsonl, valid.jsonl, test.jsonl

For each file, each line in the uncompressed file represents one function. One row is illustrated below.

• repo: the owner/repo

• path: the full path to the original file

• func_name: the function or method name

• original_string: the raw string before tokenization or parsing

• language: the programming language

• code/function: the part of the original_string that is code

• code_tokens/function_tokens: tokenized version of code

• docstring: the top-level comment or docstring, if it exists in the original string

• docstring_tokens: tokenized version of docstring

Data Statistic

Programming Language	Training	Dev	Test
Python	251,820	13,914	14,918
PHP	241,241	12,982	14,014
Go	167,288	7,325	8,122
Java	164,923	5,183	10,955
JavaScript	58,025	3,885	3,291
Ruby	24,927	1,400	1,261

Evaluator

We provide a script to evaluate predictions for this task, and report smoothed bleu-4 score.

Example

python evaluator/evaluator.py evaluator/reference.txt < evaluator/predictions.txt

Total: 5 9.554726113590661

Pipeline-CodeBERT

We also provide a pipeline that fine-tunes CodeBERT on this task. The encoder is CodeBERT and the decoder is 6-layers Transformer.

Dependency

• python 3.6 or 3.7
• torch==1.4.0
• transformers>=2.5.0

Fine-tune

To fine-tune encoder-decoder on the dataset

cd code
lang=ruby #programming language
lr=5e-5
batch_size=32
beam_size=10
source_length=256
target_length=128
data_dir=../dataset
output_dir=model/$lang
train_file=$data_dir/$lang/train.jsonl
dev_file=$data_dir/$lang/valid.jsonl
epochs=10 
pretrained_model=microsoft/codebert-base #Roberta: roberta-base

python run.py --do_train --do_eval --model_type roberta --model_name_or_path $pretrained_model --train_filename $train_file --dev_filename $dev_file --output_dir $output_dir --max_source_length $source_length --max_target_length $target_length --beam_size $beam_size --train_batch_size $batch_size --eval_batch_size $batch_size --learning_rate $lr --num_train_epochs $epochs

Inference

batch_size=64
dev_file=$data_dir/$lang/valid.jsonl
test_file=$data_dir/$lang/test.jsonl
test_model=$output_dir/checkpoint-best-bleu/pytorch_model.bin #checkpoint for test

python run.py --do_test --model_type roberta --model_name_or_path microsoft/codebert-base --load_model_path $test_model --dev_filename $dev_file --test_filename $test_file --output_dir $output_dir --max_source_length $source_length --max_target_length $target_length --beam_size $beam_size --eval_batch_size $batch_size

Evaluation

python ../evaluator/evaluator.py model/$lang/test_1.gold < model/$lang/test_1.output

Result

The results on the test set are shown as below:

Model	Ruby	Javascript	Go	Python	Java	PHP	Overall
Seq2Seq	9.64	10.21	13.98	15.93	15.09	21.08	14.32
Transformer	11.18	11.59	16.38	15.81	16.26	22.12	15.56
RoBERTa	11.17	11.90	17.72	18.14	16.47	24.02	16.57
CodeBERT	12.16	14.90	18.07	19.06	17.65	25.16	17.83

Reference

@article{husain2019codesearchnet,
  title={Codesearchnet challenge: Evaluating the state of semantic code search},
  author={Husain, Hamel and Wu, Ho-Hsiang and Gazit, Tiferet and Allamanis, Miltiadis and Brockschmidt, Marc},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.09436},
  year={2019}
}