Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About rotationt replacing the Jacobians #3

Closed
zbdehh opened this issue Jul 15, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

About rotationt replacing the Jacobians #3

zbdehh opened this issue Jul 15, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@zbdehh
Copy link

zbdehh commented Jul 15, 2021

Very good result.
When I tried to reproduce this paper, I found that the Jacobian matrix was cancelled in the v3 version of arxiv. I canceled the Jacobians and got very worried results. I would like to ask if you use the Rotation parameter to replace the Jacobian. Also want to know if the code will be open source in the near future?

@zbdehh zbdehh changed the title About rotationt Jacobians About rotationt replacing the Jacobians Jul 15, 2021
@zhanglonghao1992
Copy link
Owner

@begins233 I'm trying training without the Jacobians. It looks fine so far.

@zbdehh
Copy link
Author

zbdehh commented Jul 16, 2021

@zhanglonghao1992 Thanks.
There may be some bugs in my code, I will check the code again. This is my current result. The left is the output, the middle is the output with no expression coefficients, and the right is GT. Have you ever encountered such a situation where the posture is correct but the face is expressionless, I hope you can give me some suggestions, thank you.

NormalOutput_NoExp_GT.mp4

@zhanglonghao1992
Copy link
Owner

@begins233 It looks like there's something wrong with your implementation.

@zbdehh
Copy link
Author

zbdehh commented Jul 16, 2021

@begins233 It looks like there's something wrong with your implementation.

Thank you, I try to keep checking my code. Hope you can open source as soon as possible.

@zbdehh zbdehh closed this as completed Sep 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants